Saint Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
343.36
Introduction. The author’s objective is to analyse the key criteria of criminalisation of evasion of administrative supervision, as well as the characteristics of public danger of this act. The focus was on identifying indicators that can distinguish between a particular case of evasion of administrative supervision and minor acts. Methods. The present study was conducted using the scientific dialectical method of cognition of social phenomena. In addition, we used specific private-scientific techniques, including generalisation, analysis, synthesis, induction and deduction, taking into account the subject under consideration. Results. The author analyses the criteria of public danger and of criminalisation of evasion of administrative supervision, thereby identifying the main objective and subjective features. These features indicate the need for criminal-law protection of public relations regarding compliance with the legal regime of administrative supervision of persons released from places of deprivation of liberty. Considering the features that imply the potential for cases of evasion from administrative supervision to be regarded as insignificant acts, the author identifies a comprehensive set of circumstances. These circumstances cannot be considered by the court as features of insignificance. As a criterion of insignificance of evasion of administrative supervision, it is proposed to consider not one or two indicators, but a set of factors. Furthermore, the author does not propose that systematic unlawful behaviour on the part of the person under supervision should be considered as insignificant.
insignificance of an act, administrative prejudice, public danger, evasion, coercion
1. Barkaev G. R. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za uklonenie ot administrativnogo nadzora: neobhodimost' ili izbytochnost' ugolovno-pravovoy repressii? // Akademicheskaya mysl' : setevoe izdanie. 2022. № 2 (19). S. 16–19. URL: http://a.mvd.rf/Nauka/-akademicheskaya-mysl'-.
2. Kalinina O. M. Uklonenie ot administrativnogo nadzora: voprosy pravoprimeneniya // Vestnik Omskoy yuridicheskoy akademii. 2016. № 4 (33). S. 51–56; https://doi.org/10.19073/2306-1340-2016-4-51-56.
3. Zarina A. M. Otdel'nye voprosy praktiki primeneniya chasti 1 stat'i 314.1 UK RF // Vestnik ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti. 2024. № 2. S. 59–62; https://doi.org/10.24412/2414-3995-2024-2-59-62.
4. Zyablikova M. V., Ivaschenko V. B. Primenenie administrativnoy preyudicii i sopryazhennosti pri nesoblyudenii administrativnyh ogranicheniy, ustanovlennyh v ramkah administrativnogo nadzora // Zakonnost'. 2017. № 2 (988). S. 41–45.
5. Kasnickaya I. Yu. Uklonenie ot administrativnogo nadzora: voprosy kvalifikacii i pravoprimeneniya // Policeyskaya deyatel'nost' : setevoe izdanie. 2024. № 6. S. 67–82; https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0692.2024.6.72220. URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=72220.
6. Shestak V. A. Otdel'nye voprosy sudebnoy praktiki rassmotreniya ugolovnyh del ob uklonenii ot administrativnogo nadzora i neodnokratnom nesoblyudenii ustanovlennyh sudom ogranicheniy // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2017. № 11. S. 42–47.
7. Bavsun M. V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za uklonenie ot otbyvaniya nakazaniya (st. 314 UK RF): problemy pravovoy reglamentacii i praktiki primeneniya // Vestnik Vostochno-Sibirskogo instituta MVD Rossii. 2017. № 1 (80). S. 8–16.
8. Romashova M. V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' lic, uklonyayuschihsya ot soblyudeniya ustanovlennyh sudom adminitrativnyh ogranicheniy // Teoriya prava i mezhgosudarstvennyh otnosheniy. 2021. T. 2, № 5 (17). S. 71–79.
9. Kalinina T. M. Pravila primeneniya administrativnogo nadzora // Administrativnoe pravo i process. 2013. № 9. S. 71–73.
10. Golubov I. I. Mezhotraslevye problemy ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za neodnokratnoe nesoblyudenie licom, v otnoshenii kotorogo ustanovlen administrativnyy nadzor, administrativnyh ogranicheniy // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2017. № 2. S. 38–43.
11. Ergasheva Z. E. Neodnokratnost' i sopryazhennost' kak priznaki sostava prestupleniya, predusmotrennogo ch. 2 st. 314.1 UK RF // Kriminalist'. 2016. № 1 (18). S. 116–119.
12. Astahova A. O. O soderzhanii ponyatiya «uklonenie ot administrativnogo nadzora» v kontekste ob'ektivnoy storony sostava prestupleniya, predusmotrennogo stat'ey 314.1 UK RF // Vestnik Sibirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta FSKN Rossii. 2016. № 4 (25). S. 133–141.
13. Sinepol'skaya E. M. Analiz praktiki osuschestvleniya administrativnogo nadzora i privlecheniya k otvetstvennosti po ch. 2 st. 3141 UK RF v territorial'nom organe MVD Rossii (na primere UMVD Rossii po Angarskomu gorodskomu okrugu) / Voprosy teorii i praktiki v dosudebnom proizvodstve : materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, g. Irkutsk, 17 noyabrya 2023 g. Irkutsk : Vostochno-Sibirskiy institut MVD Rossii, 2023. S. 76–81.
14. Barkaev G. R. Kriminologicheskaya harakteristika lica, sovershivshego prestuplenie, predusmotrennoe st. 3141 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federacii / Ugolovnaya politika Rossii na sovremennom etape: sostoyanie, tendencii, perspektivy (k 100-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya G. M. Min'kovskogo) : sbornik nauchnyh trudov po materialam Mezhdunarodnoy konferencii, g. Moskva, 29 sentyabrya 2023 g. / redkol. : A. V. Pobedkin, E. Yu. Titushkina, M. V. Leletova, Ya. G. Ischuk [i dr.]. Moskva : Akademiya upravleniya MVD Rossii, 2023. S. 297–303.
15. Barhatova E. N. Voprosy zakonodatel'noy konstrukcii i osobennosti primeneniya na praktike stat'i 314.1 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federacii // Lex Russica (Russkiy zakon). 2018. № 7 (140). S. 72–81; https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2018.140.7.072-081.
16. Hromov E. V., Mironov A. V., Kozlov I. A. Problemy kvalifikacii prestupleniy po ch. 2 st. 3141 UK RF // Vestnik Akademii General'noy prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federacii. 2016. № 2 (52). S. 82–89.
