Saint-Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
342.98
Introduction. The article reveals the concept and purposes of administrative punishment, analyses the effectiveness of administrative sanctions specified by the current legislation in the context of systematisation of such punishments. The author determines that, despite the presence of certain features of systematisation, there is no reason to talk about a clear legislative consolidation of the system of administrative punishments. The current state of legislative regulation of the system of administrative punishments can not definitely assess their mutual proportionality with regard to severity, as well as determine the optimal punishment in achieving its goals, taking into account the characteristics of a particular offender. Such a situation is one of the key factors in reducing the effectiveness of the institute of administrative liability as a whole. Methods. The research involved general methods of cognition – comparison, analysis, synthesis, abstraction, systemic, structural and functional approach. Results. The author proposed to legislatively determine the gradation of administrative punishments according to the intensity of their impact on an offender, i.e. according to their severity. In this regard, it is necessary not only to arrange types of administrative punishments in the order of increasing of their severity, but also to ensure the implementation of this process separately for individuals and legal entities. Besides, the author substantiates the idea that legislative consolidation of the system of administrative punishments should not be simplified down to their listing in the order of ‘increasing severity’ and differentiating them into basic and additional ones. The systemic nature of administrative punishments should be revealed through the improvement of legislative regulation of the general rules of their imposition, consolidation of mechanisms of mutual replacement of such punishments, the possibility of imposing certain types of punishments above or below the established limits under circumstances provided by the law. Some legislative proposals for improving the system of administrative punishments are formulated.
administrative liability, administrative coercion, administrative punishment, system, sanction, prevention of offences, purposes of punishment
1. Voronenko O. A., Skokova A. N. Administrativnoe nakazanie kak mera administrativnoy otvetstvennosti / Pokolenie buduschego: vzglyad molodyh uchenyh – 2015 : sbornik nauchnyh statey 4-y Mezhdunarodnoy molodezhnoy nauchnoy konferencii, g. Kursk, 19–20 noyabrya 2015 g. : v 4 t. / otv. red. A. A. Gorohov. – Kursk : Universitetskaya kniga, 2015. T. 2. S. 204–211.
2. Mikulin A. I. Naznachenie administrativnogo nakazaniya: princip sorazmernosti // Kazanskaya nauka. 2014. № 11. S. 193–195.
3. Panov A. B. Osobennosti administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za nalogovye pravonarusheniya // Administrativnoe pravo i process. 2014. № 6. S. 41–49.
4. Suvorova Yu. V. Sistema, principy i celi administrativnyh nakazaniy // Rossiyskaya yusticiya. 2012. № 12. S. 14–15.
5. Mokareyko N. V. Naznachenie administrativnogo nakazaniya: problemy normativno-pravovogo regulirovaniya i praktiki realizacii // Vektor nauki Tol'yattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki. 2014. № 4 (19). S. 57–60.
6. Askerov M. M. Celi naznacheniya administrativnyh nakazaniy // Chernye dyry v Rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve. 2014. № 6. S. 132–134.
7. Chupriyanov Yu. A. Ponyatie administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v svete transdisciplinarnogo principa nauchnogo issledovaniya // Administrativnoe pravo i process. 2022. № 6. S. 43–46.
8. Zor'kin V. D. Konstituciya zhivet v zakonah. Rezervy povysheniya kachestva rossiyskogo zakonodatel'stva // Zhurnal konstitucionnogo pravosudiya. 2015. № 3 (45). S. 1–5.
9. Pankova O. V. Tendencii razvitiya zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v Rossii v sovremennyy period // Administrativnoe pravo i process. 2023. № 7. S. 60–65.
10. Shubin I. V. K voprosu o sistemnosti i sisteme administrativnyh nakazaniy, meste i roli v ney administrativnogo shtrafa // Administrativnoe pravo i process. 2021. № 8. S. 80–82.
11. Starilov Yu. N. Koncepciya novogo Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federacii ob administrativnyh pravonarusheniyah i «sud'ba» administrativno-deliktnogo prava: dva noveyshih voprosa v sovremennoy pravovoy teorii // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo. 2020. № 2 (41). S. 14–41.
12. Malahov S. A. K probleme sistemnosti zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnyh pravonarusheniyah Rossii // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2021. № 5. S. 319–321; https://doi.org/10.24412/2073-0454-2021-5-319-321.
13. Serebrennikova A. V. Sovremennaya ugolovnaya politika v Rossiyskoy Federacii: ponyatie i osnovnye napravleniya // Ekonomika, sociologiya i pravo. Zhurnal nauchnyh publikaciy. 2016. № 9. S. 62–65.
14. Petin I. A. Princip sistemnosti, ego znachenie i otrazhenie v ugolovnom prave Rossii. Moskva : Yurist, 2007. 297 s.
15. Tyuhtin V. S. Otrazhenie, sistemy, kibernetika : Teoriya otrazheniya v svete kibernetiki i sistemnogo podhoda. Moskva : Nauka, 1972. 256 s.
