Nizhegorodskiy gosudarstvennyy pedagogicheskiy universitet imeni Koz'my Minina
Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation
graduate student
Ryazan, Orel, Russian Federation
Ryazan
UDK 159.9 Психология
Introduction. The article presents theoretical and empirical analysis of the problem of personal responsibility in national and foreign psychological works. The results of the study of personal responsibility of cadets of educational establishments of the Federal Penal Correction Service of Russia are described. The aim of the research was to identify the structural elements of personal responsibility of cadets of educational establishments of the Federal Penal Correction Service of Russia. The empirical study was conducted at the Academy of Law and Management of the Federal Penal Correction Service of Russia. The participants were 165 cadets representing courses 1 to 5. Each course covered 33 respondents. The scientific problem is to study the personal responsibility of cadets of the educational establishment of the Federal Penal Correction Service of Russiaand to determine its structural elements. Research methods and techniques. To determine the structural elements of personal responsibility of cadets of educational establishments of FSIN of Russia the following methods and techniques were used: “Multidimensional functional diagnostics of responsibility-110 (“OTV-110”)” (V. P. Pryadein,O. V. Mukhlynina); “A Shortened “Basic English” Version (Form C) of the 16 PF Questionnaire” (R. Kettell); “Motivation of success and fear of failure” (A. A. Rean); “Moral reliability questionnaire (MRQ)” (E. Yu.Strizhov); “Test-questionnaire of selfattitude – SAR” (V. V. Stolin, S. R. Pantileev). The research revealed: the structure of personal responsibility of cadets of educational organisations of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia includes: 1) regulatory and dynamic components; 2) personal components; 3) motivational and semantic components. The regulatory and dynamic component comprises ergidity, stenicity, and internality. The personal component is made up of emotional stability, self-attitude, self-control of emotional reactions, the level of empathy, the ability to solve personal and operational difficulties. The motivational and semantic component includes sociocentricity, meaningfulness, recognition of responsibility to norms, understanding of the need to comply with norms, and the level of achievement motivation.
personal responsibility, structure of personal responsibility, elements of personal responsibility, penal system, officers, cadets, educational establishments, FSIN of Russia
1. Abul'hanova-Slavskaya K. A. Psihologiya i soznanie lichnosti (problemy metodologii, teorii i issledovaniya real'noy lichnosti). – Moskva: Modek, 1999. – 216 s.
2. Abul'hanova-Slavskaya K. A. Strategiya zhizni. – Moskva: Mysl', 1991. – 299 s.
3. Ganishina I. S., Konoplin N. Yu. K voprosu o formirovanii gotovnosti kursantov obrazovatel'nyh organizaciy FSIN Rossii k vospitatel'noy rabote s osuzhdennymi // Perspektivy nauki. – 2019. – № 10 (121). – S. 214–216.
4. Zargarov A. V. Metody i metodiki diagnostiki lichnostnoy otvetstvennosti sotrudnikov ugolovno-ispolnitel'noy sistemy // Antropocentricheskie nauki v obrazovanii: sbornik nauchnyh statey XVIII Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, Voronezh, 17–19 aprelya 2023 goda / redkol.: E. P. Komarova (otv. red.) [i dr.]. – Voronezh: Izdatel'sko-poligraficheskiy centr «Nauchnaya kniga», 2023. – S. 229–231.
5. Zargarov A. V., Gavrina E. E. Vliyanie professional'noy otvetstvennosti na formirovanie reputacii kursantov obrazovatel'nyh organizaciy Federal'noy sluzhby ispolneniya nakazaniy // Chelovek: prestuplenie i nakazanie. – 2023. – T. 31. – № 3. – S. 477–488.
6. Yonas G. Princip otvetstvennosti. Opyt etiki dlya tehnologicheskoy civilizacii. – Moskva: Ayris-press, 2004. – 480 s.
7. Minkina N. A. Vospitanie otvetstvennost'yu. – Moskva: Vysshaya shkola, 1990. – 143 s.
8. Muzdybaev K. Psihologiya otvetstvennosti. – Leningrad: Nauka, 1983. – 240 s.
9. Pryadein V. P. Otvetstvennost' kak sistemnoe kachestvo lichnosti : monografiya. – Ekaterinburg: Ural.gos.ped.un-t, 2001. – 200 s.
10. Regush L. A. Psihologiya prognozirovaniya: uspehi v poznanii buduschego. – Sankt-Peterburg: Rech', 2003. – 352 s.
11. Safin V. F. Psihologicheskaya suschnost' otvetstvennosti lichnosti // Teoriya i praktika formirovaniya kommunisticheskogo soznaniya. – Ufa, 1986. – 129 s.
12. Safin V. F. Samoopredelenie lichnosti: teoreticheskie i empiricheskie aspekty issledovaniya. – Ufa: Gilem, 2004. – 258 s.
13. Spirkin A. G. Soznanie i samosoznanie. – Moskva: Politizdat, 1972. – 303 s.
14. Strizhov E. Yu. Validnost' lichnostnogo oprosnika nravstvennoy nadezhnosti specialista // Akmeologiya. – 2009. – № 3 (31). – S. 67–70.
15. Tokarev V. S. Otvetstvennost' lichnosti kak social'no-pedagogicheskaya problema // Sibirskiy pedagogicheskiy zhurnal. – 2008. – № 2. – S. 241 – 255.
16. Leont'ev D. A. Fenomen otvetstvennosti: mezhdu nederzhaniem i geperkontrolem / Ekzistencional'noe izmerenie v konsul'tirovanii i psihoterapii. – Birshtonas; Vil'nyus: VEAET, 2005. – T. 2. – S. 7–22.
17. Plahotnyy A. F. Problema social'noy otvetstvennosti. – Har'kov: Vischa shkola : Izd-vo pri Har'k. un-te, 1981. – 190 s.
18. Kalashnikova M. M. Psihologiya otvetstvennosti lichnosti nesovershennoletnih osuzhdennyh zhenskogo pola, otbyvayuschih nakazanie v vospitatel'nyh koloniyah : monografiya. – Ryazan' : Akademiya FSIN Rossii, 2015. – 171 s.
