doctoral candidate from 01.01.2012 until now
UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
GRNTI 10.85 Криминалистика
OKSO 40.02.02 Правоохранительная деятельность
BBK 6752 Криминалистика
TBK 80 Гуманитарные науки в целом
BISAC LAW027000 Criminal Procedure
The article deals with the most important of the currently existing problems of the use of the results of operative-investigative activity, as well as formulated proposals for improving the legislation that regulates the use of the results of operative-investigative activity. According to the author, scientific development of the optimization of the legal basis for using the results of operative-investigative activity consists in finding the balance between providing stakeholders with a legal possibility to use the results of operational-search activity in socially useful purposes and ensuring respect for all the rights and legitimate interests of citizens, society and the state. The purpose of the study is the search for the currently existing, most important problems of using the results of operative-investigative activity, as well as development of proposals for improving the legislation that regulates the use of the results of operative-investigative activity. The methodology of the study was comprised of a combination of general scientific (analysis, synthesis) and special (formal-legal, comparative-legal) methods. Resulting from the study, a conclusion about the need to improve the legislation regulating the usage of the results of operative-investigative activity was made and directions for its improvement were suggested. Areas indicated for improvement are: expanding the goals and the range of subjects of using the results of operative-investigative activity, reconciliation of federal and departmental legal acts regulating the usage of the results of operative-investigative activity, as well as defect correction of law rules governing the use of the results of operative-investigative activity arising from poor legislative technique. It is the author’s conclusion that the development of theoretical and legal problems that arise when presenting and using the results of OIA is currently a promising area of legal sciences of a criminal law nature.
operative-investigative activity, results of operative-investigative activity, use of the results of operative-investigative activity, presentation of the results of operative-investigative activity, implementation of operational data
1. Potapova N. N., Dolgacheva O. I. Ispol'zovanie rezul'tatov operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti: istoriya, sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivnye napravleniya sovershenstvovaniya zakonodatel'stva // Monitoring pravoprimeneniya. - 2019. - № 2 (31). - S. 52-56. doi:https://doi.org/10.21681/2226-0692-2019-2-52-56
2. Gusev V. A., Lugovik V. F. Teoriya operativno-rozysknyh procedur : monografiya. - Moskva: Prospekt, 2019. - 336 s.
3. Zheleznyak N. S. Voprosy aktualizacii Federal'nogo zakona «Ob operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti» : monografiya. - Krasnoyarsk: SibYuI MVD Rossii, 2019. - 332 s.
4. Shatohin I. D., Chechetin A. E. Princip uvazheniya i soblyudeniya prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina v operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti : monografiya - Barnaul: Barnaul'skiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii, 2020. - 206 s.
5. Dolya E. A. Formirovanie dokazatel'stv na osnove rezul'tatov operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti : monografiya. - Moskva: Prospekt, 2015. - 376 s.
6. Kasatkina S. A. Ispol'zovanie sudom rezul'tatov ORD pri reshenii voprosa o zaklyuchenii pod strazhu // Ugolovnyy process. - 2011. - № 1. - S. 54-61.
7. Sidelev V. V. Tipichnye oshibki, dopuskaemye pri provedenii i predstavlenii rezul'tatov operativno-razysknoy deyatel'nosti / Processual'nye i organizacionno-pravovye osobennosti vzaimodeystviya organov predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya s organami, osuschestvlyayuschimi operativno-razysknuyu deyatel'nost': problemy i puti ih resheniya : materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. - Moskva: Moskovskaya akademiya Sledstvennogo komiteta Rossiyskoy Federacii, 2019. - S. 216-220.
8. Sharov V. I. Tendenciya proniknoveniya metodov i sredstv ORD v ugolovnyy process / Operativno-razysknoe protivodeystvie prestupleniyam ekonomicheskoy napravlennosti i korrupcii: peredovoy opyt, problemy i puti ih resheniya : materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. - Sankt-Peterburg: SPbU MVD Rossii, 2020. - S. 201-206.
9. Ivanov P. I. Voprosy sootnosheniya kontrolya i nadzora za operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nost'yu (ponyatiya i priznaki ih razgranicheniya) // Vestnik Vladimirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta. - 2020. - № 3 (56). - S. 67-72.
10. Fedorov A. V. Da zdravstvuet pravovoy chelovek // Narkokontrol'. - 2020. - № 1. - S. 6-8.
11. Sal'nikov V. P., Zaharcev S. I. Operativno-rozysknaya deyatel'nost': «novaya» voennaya nauka // Zaschita i bezopasnost'. - 2020. - № 3 (94). - S. 34-35.
12. Semenchuk V. V. Sudebnyy kontrol' za operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nost'yu - al'ternativa prokurorskomu nadzoru // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo. - 2020. - № 4. - S. 130-141.
13. Volosyuk P. V. Problemy ispol'zovaniya rezul'tatov operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Yuridicheskaya nauka. - 2013. - №1. - S. 38-41.
14. Polyakov M. P. Ugolovno-processual'naya interpretaciya rezul'tatov operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti : monografiya. - Nizhniy Novgorod: Nizhegorodskaya pravovaya akademiya, 2001. - 260 s.
