from 01.01.2019 to 01.01.2020
Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation
UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
GRNTI 10.77 Уголовное право
OKSO 40.06.01 Юриспруденция
BBK 67 Право. Юридические науки
TBK 7581 Уголовное право
In the article the authors examine certain problems of qualification of smuggling of timber being one of the types of strategically important goods and resources for the Russian Federation. These problems are stipulated by the specific of the legislative structure, as well as by the difficulties of interpreting this corpus delicti. Within the frame of the research it was established that that most difficulties in law enforcement activity arise in the course of criminal-legal assessment of the objective signs of timber smuggling and, mostly, of the subject of the corpus delicti under consideration and modus operandi of the crime due to the specifics of timber being the object of smuggling. In order to solve problems stated in the article, the authors analyze such ob-jective signs of corpus delicti provided for by Art. 2261 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, as a subject and an objective side on the basis of materials of of-ficial statistics, judicial practice and criminal law doctrine. As a result of the conducted analysis the authors’ recommendations on the qualification of timber smuggling are formulated. Thus, the authors clearly identified the established in the current customs legislation a list of types of timber related to the subject of the crime provided for by Art. 2261 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation; the most common modus operandi of timber smuggling in judicial practice are explained; the moment of completion of the criminal encroachment under analysis is clarified, and the amount of damage necessary to qualify the timber smuggling under Art. 2261 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation are defined.
smuggling, strategically important goods and resources, timber, body of crime, subject, objective side
1. Lazareva A. S. Kontrabanda kak ugroza ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti // Alleya nauki. - 2018. - № 11 (27). - S. 627-631.
2. Cibart K. S. Bor'ba s kontrabandoy strategicheskih tovarov i resursov / Obrazovatel'naya sistema: novacii v sfere sovremennogo nauchnogo znaniya : sbornik nauchnyh trudov. - Kazan': OOO «SitIvent», 2019. - S. 99-102.
3. Safina V. R., Paulov P. A. Kontrabanda: istoriya razvitiya ugolovno-pravovyh norm ob otvetstvennosti za kontrabandu v tamozhennoy sfere // Meridian : nauchnyy elektronnyy zhurnal. - 2020. - № 9 (43). [Elektronnyy resurs] - URL: http://meridian-journal.ru/site/article?id=3736 (data obrascheniya: 07.09.2020).
4. Kuz'menko V. K. Pravovaya harakteristika kontrabandy strategicheski vazhnyh tovarov i resursov // Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya «Yuridicheskie nauki». - 2013. - № 2 (12). - S. 108-118.
5. Kosyh V. A. Kontrabanda lesa i lesomaterialov. Problemy pravoprimeneniya // Mir yuridicheskoy nauki. - 2018. - № 5. - S. 76-82.
6. Denisov S. A. Kontrabanda strategicheski vazhnyh tovarov i resursov v regione deyatel'nosti sibirskogo tamozhennogo upravleniya // Vestnik Altayskoy akademii ekonomiki i prava. - 2014. - № 6 (38). - S. 21-23.
7. Kovalenko A. V., Zhiharev N. S. Kontrabanda lesa na territorii Irkutskoy oblasti i v Bratskom rayone / Aktual'nye voprosy transportnoy bezopasnosti : sbornik materialov regional'noy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. - Irkutsk: Vostochno-Sibirskiy institut MVD Rossii, 2016. - S. 27-29.
8. Mayakova A. S. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za kontrabandu: voprosy kvalifikacii // Vestnik Rossiyskoy tamozhennoy akademii. - 2011. - № 3. - S. 48-55.
9. Morozova I. A. Sovremennye sposoby osuschestvleniya kontrabandy // Vestnik sovremennyh issledovaniy. - 2018. - № 12.11 (27). - S. 122-123.
10. Talan M. V. Sovershenstvovanie ugolovno-pravovyh norm ob otvetstvennosti za kontrabandu // Aktual'nye problemy ugolovnogo prava na sovremennom etape (voprosy differenciacii otvetstvennosti i zakonodatel'noy tehniki). - 2018. - № 7 (7). - S. 47-55.
