employee from 01.01.2022 until now
Autonomus Nonprofit Organization of Higher Education «International Banking Institute named after Anatoliy Sobchak» (Department of Law, professor)
employee from 01.01.2025 until now
Sankt-Peterburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
UDC 342.56
Russian Classification of Professions by Education 40.03.01
Russian Library and Bibliographic Classification 6771
Introduction. The The judicial branch of government exercises judicial review over law enforcement across the Russian Federation; therefore, the well-functioning of this branch is of critical importance to the state. At the same time, a clearly defined structure of the judicial system is a prerequisite for achieving fair oversight. It is for this reason that the aim of the article is to examine the genesis of the construction of the tiers of the judicial system in conjunction with the evolving hierarchy of the system of normative legal sources regulating this process. Methods. This research is based on the dialectical method and incorporates content analysis of scholarly and regulatory sources. The methodological framework also includes hermeneutic, descriptive, formal-logical, comparative legal, systemicstructural, and heuristic methods. Results. The study presents the author’s periodisation of the reform of the structure of the Russian judicial system (1993–2025). The key directions for its further transformation are identified: the advancement of digitalisation in judicial proceedings, clarifying the status of arbitration tribunals (arbitral institutions) as quasi-judicial bodies within the Russian judicial system and consolidating this status at the level of constitutional legislation, establishing a system of specialised courts, and creating a normative framework for their operation based on a corresponding federal constitutional law. The author considers the establishment of specialised administrative courts to be one of the highest-priority measures. The analysis highlights the connection between the judicial system and public administration in the context of contemporary challenges and the pursuit of sustainable development goals. Consequently, a shared trend in modernising the structure of both the judiciary and public administration is observed, centered on client-centricity, transparency (openness), the application of information and communication technologies, and the principles of “lean management”. Conclusions. The ongoing transformations of the Russian judicial system collectively and consistently advance the sixteenth Sustainable Development Goal, which is to promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all, and build effective, accountable, and inclusive institutions at all levels.
Russian judicial system, structure of the judicial system, arbitration tribunals, specialised courts, stages of reforming the Russian judicial system, normative framework of the Russian judicial system
1. Mar'ina E. V. Transformaciya sudebnoy sistemy Rossiyskoy Federacii na sovremennom etape // Yuridicheskiy vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. 2018. № 4. S. 70–75. https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-047X-2018-4-4-70-75
2. Abova T. E. Razvitie sudebnoy sistemy v Rossii (grazhdanskoe sudoproizvodstvo) // Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. 2010. № 3. S. 120–137.
3. Reshetnikova I. V. Etapy sudebnoy reformy v Rossii // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2014. № 10 (47). S. 2182–2186.
4. Guk P. A. Sudebnaya vlast' v Rossii: istoriko-pravovoy vzglyad na formirovanie i razvitie / Mesto i rol' teoretiko-istoricheskih pravovyh disciplin v formirovanii grazhdanskoy pozicii i chuvstva patriotizma obuchayuschihsya : materialy kruglogo stola, g. Vladimir, 15 marta 2024 g. Vladimir : Rossiyskaya akademiya narodnogo hozyaystva i gosudarstvennoy sluzhby pri Prezidente Rossiyskoy Federacii, Vladimirskiy filial, 2024. S. 22–27.
5. Grigor'eva A. G., Zhinkin S. A., Vysockaya L. P. Evolyuciya organov arbitrazhnoy sistemy v Rossii // Gumanitarnye, social'no-ekonomicheskie i obschestvennye nauki. 2018. № 7. S. 93–96. https://doi.org/10.23672/SAE.2018.2018.15800
6. Mozhaev E. E., Safronov N. S. Treteyskie sudy kak chast' yurisdikcionnoy sistemy // Nacional'naya associaciya uchenyh. 2015. № 4 (9). S. 45–54.
7. Tischenko A. V. Elektronnoe pravosudie: sudebnoe reformirovanie k 2020 godu // Pravoporyadok: istoriya, teoriya, praktika. 2018. № 4 (19). S. 65–69.
8. Zhdanova Yu. A. Pravovaya priroda elektronnogo pravosudiya i ego mesto v sisteme institutov informacionnogo obschestva // Administrativnoe pravo i process. 2015. № 4. S. 80–83.
9. Zarubina M. N., Novikova M. M. K voprosu o suschnosti elektronnogo pravosudiya v Rossiyskoy Federacii // Administrator suda. 2017. № 1. S. 9–12.
10. Fedoseeva N. N., Chaykovskaya M. A. Elektronnoe pravosudie v Rossii i v mire // Administrator suda. 2011. № 3. S. 2–6.
11. Kashanin A. V., Kozyreva A. B., Kurnosova N. A., Malov D. V. Informacionnye tehnologii v pravosudii: sostoyanie i perspektivy : Rossiya i mir : analiticheskiy doklad. Moskva : Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki, 2020. 81 s.
12. Kurbanov R. A., Gurbanov R. A., Belyalova A. M. Informacionnye tehnologii i pravosudie: Rossiya i zarubezhnyy opyt // Ekonomika. Pravo. Obschestvo. 2019. № 3 (19). S. 56–63.
13. Nan' Gun. Sudebnoe primenenie i ogranicheniya iskusstvennogo intellekta // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo. 2025. T. 16, № 1. S. 230–251. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2025.117
14. Malyshkin A. V. Specializirovannye sudy v kontekste differenciacii i integracii sudebnyh yurisdikciy // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2019. № 446. S. 240–246. https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/446/31
15. Kistrinova O. V. Specializirovannye sudy: opyt Rossii i zarubezhnyh stran // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2015. № 2. S. 9–11.
16. Prizhennikova A. N. Perspektivy razvitiya specializirovannyh sudov v Rossii // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. 2014. № 6. S. 116–129. https://doi.org/10.7256/2305-9699.2014.6.11845
17. Shamahov V. A., Suslov Yu. E. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie ustoychivym razvitiem Rossii: problemy i napravleniya ih resheniya // Ustoychivoe innovacionnoe razvitie: proektirovanie i upravlenie. 2013. T. 9, № 4 (21). S. 82–94.
