ANTI-CRIMINAL COGNITION AS A METHODOLOGICAL BASIS FOR THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL AND INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
Introduction. Modern criminal procedure increasingly faces the need to integrate information obtained within the framework of criminal intelligence into the system of criminal procedural evidence. However, there is no methodologically verified model to theoretically justify the legitimacy of such information. The existing disconnection between procedural and non-procedural forms of legal cognition hinders the development of a coordinated approach to using information about criminal activity. The article attempts to eliminate this theoretical and applied gap. Methods. The research is based on the epistemological analysis of legal information, logical-legal modeling, and the comparison of current norms with the cognitive nature of criminal proceedings. Elements of formal and dialectical logic are applied, and an interdisciplinary approach is used. Results. The author introduces and substantiates a new methodological category – anticriminal cognition encompassing both criminal procedural and criminal intelligence cognitive activities. Two fundamental principles of this category are identified: unity and continuity. The author proposes a normative perspective for recognising procedurally significant information as an element subject to transformation into admissible evidence. The concept of anti-criminal cognition can form the basis for reforming approaches to the admissibility of information obtained through criminal intelligence and for eliminating the methodological gap between forms of legal cognition..

Keywords:
anti-criminal cognition, criminal procedural information, criminal intelligence, epistemology of law
Text
Text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Borulenkov Yu. P. O zakonomernostyah yuridicheskogo poznaniya v processual'noy deyatel'nosti // Mirovoy sud'ya. 2014. № 2. S. 9–15.

2. Karyakin E. A. Specifika ugolovno-processual'nogo poznaniya // Rossiyskaya yusticiya. 2016. № 9. S. 29–32.

3. Rossinskiy S. B. Metodologicheskie problemy dokazyvaniya v sostyazatel'nom ugolovnom processe // Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal. 2016. № 1 (24). S. 79–92.

4. Zemerov I. A. Nekotorye voprosy sootnosheniya rezhimnyh, operativno-rozysknyh i ugolovno-processual'nyh sredstv poznaniya sobytiya prestupleniya // Vestnik Tomskogo instituta povysheniya kvalifikacii rabotnikov FSIN Rossii. 2020. № 2 (4). S. 19–26.

5. Sidorova A. V. Formy yuridicheskogo poznaniya: voprosy teorii i praktiki // Sibirskiy antropologicheskiy zhurnal. 2021. T. 5, № 1. S. 211–222.

6. Suleymanov T. A., Nazarkin E. V., Zaharova S. S. Ugolovno-processual'noe poznanie rezul'tatov operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti i rezhimnyh meropriyatiy v kachestve dokazatel'stv pri rassledovanii ugolovnogo dela // Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2021. № 9 (160). S. 328 330.

7. Francuzov A. O., Moldavskiy M. V. Operativno-rozysknye meropriyatiya kak sposob poznaniya v operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti // Professional'noe yuridicheskoe obrazovanie i nauka. 2023. № 1 (9). S. 105–108.

8. Nechaev V. V. K voprosu o suschnosti ugolovno-processual'nogo poznaniya / Lichnost', pravo, gosudarstvo: problemy razvitiya i vzaimodeystviya : sbornik statey nauchno-predstavitel'skih meropriyatiy. Moskva : IP Kolupaeva E. V., 2023. S. 308–310.

9. Semencov V. A. K voprosu o popolnenii sistemy sledstvennyh deystviy neglasnymi poznavatel'nymi priemami // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2016. № 4. S. 48–57.

10. Borulenkov Yu. P. Yuridicheskoe poznanie i sudebnoe dokazyvanie (ritoricheskaya model') : monografiya. Moskva : Yurlitinform, 2023.

11. Grishina E. P. Special'nye poznaniya v kontekste ugolovno-processual'noy nauki i pravoprimenitel'noy praktiki : monografiya / pod redakciey V. M. Bozrova. Moskva : Yurlitinform, 2022.

12. Zinchenko I. A. Issledovaniya problem ugolovno-processual'nogo dokazatel'stvennogo prava dolzhny byt' produmannymi i korrektnymi // Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal. 2016. № 4 (27). S. 20–26.

13. Przhilenskiy V. I. Poznanie prava i pravoprimenitel'nye praktiki kak vidy yuridicheskoy deyatel'nosti // Yuridicheskaya deyatel'nost': soderzhanie, tehnologii, principy, idealy : monografiya / pod obschey red. O. Yu. Rybakova. Moskva : Prospekt, 2022. S. 129–151.

14. Stroeva Yu. V., Pavlova A. A. Suschnost' dokazyvaniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Vestnik Severo-vostochnogo federal'nogo universiteta im. M. K. Ammosova. Seriya «Obschestvennye nauki. Social science» : setevoe izdanie. 2023. № 1 (29). S. 16–20. URL: https://www.ippsvfu.ru/jour/article/view/183/180.

15. Glazunova I. V., Obrazcov V. A. Konceptual'nye osnovy sledstvennogo poznaniya : monografiya. Moskva : Yurlitinform, 2023. 376s.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?