employee
Saint Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
159.9
Introduction. The peculiarities of professional activity in the divisions of the internal affairs bodies suggest a high level of psychological tension and health or life risks for the employee. Given specificity directly predetermines the high demands for personal and qualitative characteristics of each employee of the above-mentioned structure. The orientation of perception and reflection of the objective world as dangerous or safe in the absence of real threats determines the subjective assessment of the situation and the analytical and predictive ability of employees and can affect the performance of professional tasks. The expansion of psychodiagnostic tools with the help of the proposed author’s questionnaire “Self-assessment of psychological safety”, which allows to determine the level of psychological safety or danger experienced by employees, will contribute to the early prevention of negative consequences for the professional and personal lives of employees. The Self-Assessment of Psychological Safety questionnaire consists of 26 statements evaluated on a six-point scale. The final score is formed by summing up the grades received for each item and assumes, depending on the final result, theexperience level determination of psychological safety or danger. Research Methods. Correlation analysis, factor analysis, expert assessments and comparative analysis. Reliability assessment based on uniformity, retest reliability, expert and design validity. Results. The reliability and validity of the developed questionnaire “Self-assessment of psychological safety” was confirmed by the presented results of the psychometric verification procedures. Due to its small size and uncomplicated processing system, the developed psychodiagnostic technique can be used for rapid assessment of the current moral and psychological state of employees as part of psychological support for law enforcement agencies activities.
psychological safety, psychological danger, psychodiagnostics, moral and psychological state, rapid assessment, questionnaire
1. Aleksandrova, L. A., Markova, V. I. (2022). Aprobaciya shkaly «Perezhivanie neopredelennosti i ugrozy» na russkoyazychnoj vyborke. V Psihologiya stressa i sovladayushchego povedeniya: ustojchivost' i izmenchivost' otnoshenij, lichnosti, gruppy v epohu neopredelennosti: materialy VI Mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii (Kostroma, 22–24 sentyabrya 2022 goda, str. 291– 295). Kostroma: Kostromskoj gosudarstvennyj universitet.
2. Baeva, I. A. (2020). Psihologicheskie problemy obespecheniya bezopasnosti v obrazovanii. Mir psihologii, 2 (102), 184–190.
3. Buharov, D. S. (2020). Teoreticheskij analiz podhodov ponyatiya "psihologicheskoj bezopasnosti", kak faktora psihologicheskoj bezopasnosti lichnosti v sovremennoj psihologicheskoj literature. V D. A. Pogonyshev (otv. red.), Nauchnye trudy magistrantov i aspirantov: sbornik nauchnyh trudov (Tom Vypusk 17, str. 73–76). Nizhnevartovsk: Nizhnevartovskij gosudarstvennyj universitet.
4. Verbina, G. G. (2013). Psihologicheskaya bezopasnost' lichnosti. Vestnik Chuvashskogo universiteta, 4, 196–202.
5. Eremeev, S. G., Revyagin, A. V. (2014). Psihologicheskaya bezopasnost' obshchestva i lichnosti. Psihopedagogika v pravoohranitel'nyh organah, 4 (59), 44–47.
6. Zhuravlev, A. L., Tarabrina, N. V. (otv. red.) (2012). Problemy psihologicheskoj bezopasnosti: sbornik statej. Moskow: Izdatel'stvo "Institut psihologii RAN".
7. Zotova, O. Yu. (2011). Bezopasnost' lichnosti kak social'no-psihologicheskij fenomen: monografiya. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Gumanitarnogo un-ta.
8. Kornilova, T. V., Pavlova, E. M. (2020). Shkala intellektual'noj ocenki riska i ee svyaz' s gotovnost'yu k risku i emocional'nym intellektom. Konsul'tativnaya psihologiya i psihoterapiya, 28 (4), 59– 78. https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2020280404
9. Krasnoshtanova, N. N. (2023). Predstavleniya sotrudnikov organov vnutrennih del o psihologicheskoj bezopasnosti sub"ekta sluzhebnoj deyatel'nosti. Prikladnaya psihologiya i pedagogika, 8 (4), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.12737/2500-0543-2023-8-4-167-178
10. Krasnyanskaya, T. M., Tylec, V. G. (2016). Psihologicheskij analiz urovnej bezopasnosti cheloveka. Izvestiya Gomel'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni F. Skoriny, 2 (95), 31–36.
11. Kutenkova, O. Yu. (2024). Psihologicheskaya bezopasnost' v predstavleniyah sotrudnikov organov vnutrennih del. V Sankt-Peterburgskie vstrechi molodyh uchenyh: materialy II vserossijskogo kongressa (Sankt-Peterburg, 11 iyunya 2024 goda, str. 101–108). Saint Petersburg: Sankt-Peterburgskij universitet MVD Rossii.
12. Litvinova, A. V., Koteneva, A. V., Kokurin, A. V., Ivanov V. S. (2021). Problemy psihologicheskoj bezopasnosti lichnosti v ekstremal'nyh usloviyah zhiznedeyatel'nosti. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psihologiya, 10 (1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2021100101
13. Morozova, I. S., Medovikova, E. A., Kargina, A. E. (2022). Osobennosti parametrov psihologicheskoj bezopasnosti lichnosti s razlichnym urovnem professional'noj vremennoj perspektivy. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika. Psihologiya. Sociokinetika, 28 (1), 92–101.
14. Prihod'ko, I. I. (2013). Razrabotka psihodiagnosticheskogo instrumentariya opredeleniya psihologicheskoj bezopasnosti lichnosti specialistov ekstremal'nyh vidov deyatel'nosti. Vestnik universiteta, 11, 242–253.
15. Smyk, Yu. V., Kachimskaya, A. Yu. (2021). Potencial psihologicheskoj bezopasnosti pedagoga kak uslovie psihologicheskoj bezopasnosti shkol'nika. Science for Education Today, 11 (1), 42–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2101.03
16. Harlamenkova, N. E. (2019). Ponyatie psihologicheskoj bezopasnosti i ego obosnovanie s raznyh nauchnyh pozicij. Psihologicheskij zhurnal, 40 (1), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.31857/S020595920002985-9
17. Eksakusto, T. V., Lyz', N. A. (2010). Psihologicheskaya bezopasnost' v problemnom pole psihologii. Sibirskij psihologicheskij zhurnal, 37, 86–91.
18. Charteris, J., Anderson, J., & Page, A. (2021). Psychological safety in innovative learning environments: planning for inclusive spaces. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28 (5), 688– 704. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1974108
19. Hu, Sh., Nadeem, M. A., Luo, Ji., & Yi, X. (2024). The effects of psychological safety and employee voice behavior on flight attendants’ mindful safety practices adoption. Frontiers in Public Health, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1398815
20. Hwang, Y. I. (Jane), Simpson, P. L., & Butler, T. G. (2021). Victim and Victim Support Staff Experiences of a Domestic Violence Electronic Monitoring Program in Australia. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 67 (9), 976-995. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x211058950
21. Rice, S., Walton, C. C., Pilkington, V. et al. (2022). Psychological safety in elite sport settings: a psychometric study of the Sport Psychological Safety Inventory. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine, 8 (2), e001251. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2021-001251
