159.9
15.00
37.05.02
Introduction. Emerging technologies provide opportunities to improve professional reliability of police officers at transport facilities. At the same time, questions arise about the ability of the security system to meet new requirements. Rising global challenges, changing configuration of risks and threats, including those associated with a special military operation, require officers to make effective decisions in time limit situations and other resource shortage in order to prevent various hazards from turning into acts of illegal interference at transport hubs. The objective of the study is to prove the use of attributive theory in dangerous phenomena issues awareness by transport police officers and prevent their transition to acts of illegal interference. Methodological basis of the study was founded on concepts and approaches aimed at studying perception, social perception, understanding, ideas, social intelligence, phenomenology of lying and information distortion. The result of the theoretical study proved attributive theory useful in achieving the objective. We formulate the basic ideas of dangerous phenomena attribution awareness with respect to activity of transport police officers. The results allow us to get further indetermining psychological characteristics necessary for reliable functioning of transport police officers in recognising dangerous phenomena and preventing their transition to acts of illegal interference.
threats classification, ideas about dangerous phenomena, attribution theory, processes of understanding and awareness, images of dangerous phenomena
1. Abul'hanova-Slavskaya, K. A. (1991). Strategiya zhizni: monografiya. Moskow: Mysl'.
2. Anan'ev, B. G. (2001). Psihologiya chuvstvennogo poznaniya. Moskow: Nauka.
3. Barabanshchikov, V. A., Suvorova, E. V. (2023). Vyrazhenie i vospriyatie mul'timodal'nyh emocional'nyh sostoyanij. Nacional'nyj psihologicheskij zhurnal, 18 (3), 106–127.
4. Bobneva, M. I. (1979). Psihologicheskie problemy social'nogo razvitiya lichnosti. V Social'naya psihologiya lichnosti: sbornik statej (str. 35–62). Moskow: Izdatel'stvo «Nauka».
5. Brudnyj, A. A. (1996). Nauka ponimat'. Bishkek: Izdatel'stvo Bishkekskogo universiteta.
6. Gostev, A. A. (2007). Psihologiya vtorichnogo obraza: monografiya. Moskow: Institut psihologii RAN.
7. Golajdenko, L. N. (2018). Metafora kak kognitivnoe, yazykovoe i esteticheskoe yavlenie v hudozhestvennoj proze (na primere leksiki so znacheniem obraza). Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 4 (82), 332–336. https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2018-4-2.27
8. Duhnovskij, S. V. (2023). Problema temporal'nyh kadrovyh riskov sotrudnikov organov vnutrennih del. V O. I. Gorodovaya, O. S. Kravchenko, A. A. Zhavoronkova (sost.), 25 let na sluzhbe Otechestvu: sbornik nauchnyh trudov, posvyashchennyj deyatel'nosti nauchnyh shkol Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii i priurochennoj k 25-letiyu so dnya ego obrazovaniya (str. 193–197). Saint Petersburg: Sankt-Peterburgskij universitet MVD Rossii.
9. Zavalova, N. D., Lomov, B. F., Ponomarenko, V. A. (1986). Obraz v sisteme psihicheskoj regulyacii deyatel'nosti: monografiya. Moskow: Izdatel'stvo «Nauka».
10. Znakov, V. V. (2012). Mnogomernyj mir cheloveka: tipy real'nosti, ponimaniya i social'nogo znaniya. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14: Psihologiya, 3, 18–29.
11. Leont'ev, A. N. (2002). Potrebnosti, motivy, emocii. V Yu. B. Gippenrejter, M. V. Falikman (red.), Psihologiya motivacii i emocij (str. 75–79). Moskow: CheRo.
12. Matyuhin, O. I. (2021). Ispol'zovanie profajlinga v deyatel'nosti organov vnutrennih del po obespecheniyu obshchestvennoj bezopasnosti na ob"ektah vozdushnogo transporta. Akademicheskaya mysl', 3 (16), 123–125.
13. Markova, A. K., Nikonova, A. Ya. (1978). Psihologicheskie osobennosti individual'nogo stilya deyatel'nosti uchitelya. Voprosy psihologii, 40–48.
14. Merlin, V. S. (2000). Individual'nyj stil' deyatel'nosti i ego sistemoobrazuyushchaya funkciya. V Psihologiya individual'nyh razlichij (str. 128–139). Moskow: CheRo.
15. Nikolaeva, E. V. (2019). Pravovye mery po vyyavleniyu i predotvrashcheniyu kiberprestuplenij v ramkah zashchity transportnoj seti RF. Okeanskij menedzhment, 1 (4), 10–14.
16. Olport, G. (2002). Stanovlenie lichnosti: Izbrannye trudy (per. s angl. L. V. Trubicynoj i D. A. Leont'eva). Moskow: Smysl.
17. Piazhe, Zh. (1996). Affektivnoe bessoznatel'noe i kognitivnoe bessoznatel'noe. Voprosy psihologii.
18. Ponomarev, Ya. A. (1983). Metodologicheskoe vvedenie v psihologiyu: monografiya. Moskow: Izdatel'stvo «Nauka».
19. Rubinshtejn, S. L. (1999). Osnovy obshchej psihologii. Saint Petersburg: Piter.
20. Sitnikov, V. L. (2024). Ob aktual'nosti issledovaniya social'no-perceptivnyh obrazov sotrudnikov policii. V Aktual'nye problemy psihologii pravoohranitel'noj deyatel'nosti: koncepcii i tekhnologii resheniya (Vasil'evskie chteniya - 2024): materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii (Sankt-Peterburg, 26–27 aprelya 2024 goda, str. 692–697). Saint Petersburg: Sankt-Peterburgskij universitet MVD Rossii.
21. Strelkov, Yu. K. (2010). Temporal'nost' trudovoj deyatel'nosti. Nacional'nyj psihologicheskij zhurnal, 2 (4), 87–91.
22. Tolochek, V. A. (2015). Ctili deyatel'nosti: resursnyj podhod. Moskow: Izd-vo «Institut psihologii RAN».
23. Torndajk, E., Uotson, Dzh. (1998). Principy obucheniya, osnovannye na psihologii. Psihologiya kak nauka o povedenii. Moskow: AST-LTD.
24. Chuprikova, N. I. (2009). Soznanie v funkcional'noj sisteme psihicheskogo otrazheniya, regulyacii povedeniya i deyatel'nosti. Metodologiya i istoriya psihologii, 4 (1), 113–129.
25. Sharanov, Yu. A. (1998). Psihologiya deyatel'nosti sluzhebnogo kollektiva organov vnutrennih del (upravlenchesko-razvivayushchij podhod): monografiya. Saint Petersburg: Sankt-Peterburgskaya akademiya MVD Rossii.
26. Yadov, V. A. (2013). Samoregulyaciya i prognozirovanie social'nogo povedeniya lichnosti: Dispozicionnaya koncepciya: monografiya. Moskow: OOO «Centr social'nogo prognozirovaniya i marketinga».
27. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
28. Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119 (1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3
29. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J Risk Uncertainty, 5, 297–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122574
