employee from 01.01.2024 until now
Sankt- Peterburg, Russian Federation
159.9
Introduction. The article deals with the antisocial aspect of the negative phenomenon of obsessive stalking. The author substantiates the necessity of timely preventive measures against this form of mental violence in order to avoid its transformation into a criminally punishable threat of murder or causing serious harm to health, and their hypothetical development into violent murders. Methods. The article is based on the materials of the author’s own sociological research conducted in the form of a questionnaire survey of 683 law enforcers in 8 administrative centres of the federal districts of the Russian Federation: St. Petersburg, Moscow, Nizhny Novgorod, Rostov-on-Don, Novosibirsk, Yekaterinburg, Pyatigorsk, Vladivostok (60 justices of the peace and district judges of courts of general jurisdiction, 92 prosecutors, 192 investigators of internal affairs bodies, 263 inquirers of internal affairs bodies, 27 divisional inspectors, 20 juvenile inspectors, 29 operational duty officers were interviewed), as well as the content analysis of mass media, including Internet news sources. Results. The author has developed a mechanism of preventive measures, consisting in considering obsessive stalking as antisocial behavior and adopting changes aimed at empowering divisional inspectors to carry out individual preventive work so that they could give a legal warning against continuing antisocial behavior.
obsessive stalking, counteraction, antisocial behavior, death threats, divisional inspectors, mental violence, cyberstalking
1. Antipov, A. I. (2022). Ugolovno-pravovoe znachenie ispol'zovaniya sredstv massovoj informacii i informacionno-telekommunikacionnyh setej pri sovershenii prestuplenij s priznakami prizyvov, skloneniya, nezakonnogo oborota predmetov i materialov: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Saint Petersburg.
2. Afanas'eva, I. V., Afanas'ev, I. V., Pimonov, V. A. (2024). Presledovanie (stalkerstvo): formy povede-niya, tipologii, otvetstvennost' v zarubezhnom i rossijskom zakonodatel'stve. Psihologiya i pravo, 14 (2), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2024140205
3. arysheva, K. A. (2016). Presledovanie kak novyj vid ugolovno-nakazuemogo deyaniya. Probely v rossijskom zakonodatel'stve, 8, 178–182.
4. Vakulenko, N. A., Achkasova, M. G. (2022). Aktual'nye statistiko-kriminologicheskie parametry semejno-bytovoj prestupnosti sovremennosti. Yurist"-Pravoved", 2 (101), 90–95.
5. Dashieva, A. D. (2024). Voprosy opredeleniya sistematichnosti pri kvalifikacii prestuplenij. Vestnik Universiteta imeni O. E. Kutafina (MGYUA), 6 (118), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2024.118.6.121-128
6. Zharova, A. K. (2024). Informacionno-psihologicheskoe nasilie v ugolovnom prave. Informacionnoe obshchestvo, 2, 103–111.
7. Zebnickaya, A. K. (2020). Nekotorye voprosy pravovoj reglamentacii «bytovogo (domashnego) nasiliya» v Rossii i SSHA. Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaya yusticiya, 3, 17–19.
8. Kachaeva, M. A., Shishkina, O. A. (2021). Psihologo-psihiatricheskie problemy u zhenshchin zhertv vnutrisemejnogo nasiliya i ih osobennosti v usloviyah samoizolyacii v rezul'tate pandemii COVID-19 (nauchnyj obzor). Psihologiya i pravo, 11 (3), 131–155. https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2021110310
9. Klochenko, L. N. (2019). Psihicheskoe nasilie: voprosy ugolovno-pravovoj reglamentacii i kvalifikacii: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Moskow.
10. Kobec, P. N., Krasnova, K. A. (2018). Ob obshchestvennoj opasnosti kiberstalkinga i neobhodimosti ego preduprezhdeniya. Vestnik Vostochno-Sibirskogo instituta MVD Rossii, 3 (86), 77–83.
11. Krukovskij, V. E., Mosechkin, I. N. (2020). O formah nefizicheskogo (psihologicheskogo) nasiliya v ugolovnom zakonodatel'stve Rossii. Psihologiya i pravo, 10 (1), 171–182. https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2020100115
12. Mkrtychyan, B. A. (2003). Vovlechenie nesovershennoletnih v sovershenie prestuplenij i inyh antiobshchestvennyh dejstvij: ugolovno-pravovoj i kriminologicheskij aspekty: avtoreferat dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Chelyabinsk.
13. Ogar', T. A. (2022). Sistematichnost' kak kriterij uvelicheniya stepeni obshchestvennoj opasnosti deyaniya prinuzhdeniya. V Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo i administrativno-processual'nogo prava (Sorokinskie chteniya): sbornik statej po materialam mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii, posvyashchennoj pamyati doktora yuridicheskih nauk, professora, zasluzhennogo deyatelya nauki Rossijskoj Federacii, zasluzhennogo yurista Rossijskoj Federacii Avrutina Yuriya Efremovicha v svyazi s 75-letiem so dnya rozhdeniya (Sankt-Peterburg, 25 marta 2022 goda, str. 505–510). Saint Petersburg: Sankt-Peterburgskij universitet MVD Rossii.
14. Steshich, E. S. (2023). Deviantologicheskie aspekty profilaktiki seksual'nyh pravonarushenij, svyazannyh s seksual'nym prinuzhdeniem i domogatel'stvom. Rossijskij deviantologicheskij zhurnal, 1, 111–117. https://doi.org/10.35750/2713-0622-2023-1-111-117.
15. Storublenkova, E. G., Samutkin, V. L. (2017). Stalking: sindrom navyazchivogo presledovaniya. Probely v rossijskom zakonodatel'stve, 6, 278–281.
16. Hanova, Z. R. (2008). Vovlechenie nesovershennoletnih v sovershenie antiobshchestvennyh dejstvij: ugolovno-pravovye i kriminologicheskie problemy: avtoreferat dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Moskow.
17. Shchepel'kov, V. F. (2022). Protivodejstvie domashnemu nasiliyu v Rossijskoj Federacii: sostoyanie i perspektivy. Kriminalist", 2 (39), 95–103.
18. Gürgezoğlu Yapar, E., & Akça, B. (2024). Stalking: A study on lawyers registered with the Istanbul Bar Association. Journal of Awareness, 9 (Özel 2), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.26809/joa.2517
19. Meloy, J. R. (1998). The psycology of stalking. San Diego, California: Academy press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-490560-3.X5018-X
20. Suzuki, T. (2024). A survey on the reasons why victims of stalking did not exhibit help-seeking behavior: a text-mining analysis. BMC Psychol, 12, 515. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02035-7
21. Van der Aa, S. (2018). New Trends in the Criminalization of Stalking in the EU Member States. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 24, pp. 315–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-017-9359-9
