Kaliningrad, Kalinigrad, Russian Federation
343
Introduction. Unauthorised extraction of amber in the Kaliningrad region is a fairly common and widespread phenomenon, the fight against that is one of the economic tasks at the federal level. The article identifies some features of persons who have committed crimes under Articles 191 and 255 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Methodological recommendations are proposed using situational modeling in the investigation of crimes related to the illicit trafficking of amber, jade or other semiprecious stones in a formalised structured table. Methods. The universal method of cognition, dialectics was used in the work. In addition the method of system analysis, the comparative legal method, the statistical method and the method of document research in the study of law enforcement practice were also used in the research process. Results. Based on the analysed judicial practice, personality portraits of criminals involved in illegal amber mining and gold trafficking were formed, which made it possible to trace the choice of courts in terms of sentencing. It has been established that the problem of the irreplaceability of environmental damage from crimes remains open due to the impossibility of imposing penalties due to the low welfare of the offender. In addition a standard information model was built that includes three main information blocks: “pre-criminal situation”, “actual criminal situation” and “post-criminal situation”, since the study of various stages of illicit trafficking and extraction of amber, jade or other semiprecious resources should be approached taking into account a situational approach that allows identifying missing information in the investigation of crimes.
illicit trafficking, amber, criminal's identity, situational approach
1. Volcheckaya T. S., Malevski G. M., Rener N. A. Problemy razvitiya yantarnoy otrasli i protivodeystvie nezakonnomu oborotu yantarya v baltiyskom regione // Baltiyskiy region. 2017. T.9, № 4. S. 114–128. https://doi.ord/10.5922/2074-9848-2017-4-6.
2. Malkov V. P. Administrativnaya preyudiciya: za i protiv // Vestnik Akademii General'noy prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federacii. 2011. № 3 (23). S. 58–64.
3. Vishnyakova N. V. Prestupleniya s administrativnoy preyudiciey: problemy zakonodatel'nogo i pravoprimenitel'nogo haraktera // Vestnik Sibirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. 2019. № 1 (34). S. 5–12.
4. Kotova A. A. K voprosu ob ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za nezakonnyy oborot dragocennyh metallov, dragocennyh i poludragocennyh kamney // Evraziyskaya advokatura. 2021. № 3 (52). S. 88–92. https://doi.ord/10.52068/2304-9839_2021_52_3_88.
5. Kapinus O. S. Ekologicheskie prestupleniya: problemy ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti // Vestnik ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti. 2022. № 1. S. 107–112. https://doi.org/10.24412/2414-3995-2022-1-107-112.
6. Zabavko R. A. Ugolovnaya politika v oblasti ohrany okruzhayuschey prirodnoy sredy: pravovoe regulirovanie i realizaciya / Aktual'nye voprosy prokurorskoy deyatel'nosti: 300 let na strazhe rossiyskoy gosudarstvennosti : materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, g. Irkutsk, 30 oktyabrya 2021 g. / otv. red. O. V. Gorbach. Irkutsk: Irkutskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 2021. S. 158–161.
7. Rednikova T. V. Protivodeystvie ekologicheskim prestupleniyam v Rossiyskoy Federacii: novelly pravovogo regulirovaniya // Soyuz kriminalistov i kriminologov. 2021. № 3. S. 18–25.
8. Kolesnikov S. I. Operativno-rozysknaya harakteristika nezakonnogo oborota yantarya: ot nelegal'noy dobychi do sbyta // Trudy Akademii upravleniya MVD Rossii. 2022. № 2 (62). S. 103–109. https://doi.org/10.24412/2072-9391-2022-262-103-109.
9. Zabavko R. A., Rogova E. V. Osobennosti otvetstvennosti za nezakonnye dobychu i oborot yantarya, nefrita ili inyh poludragocennyh kamney // Mirovoy sud'ya. 2021. № 3. S. 8–13.
10. Zabavko R. A. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za nezakonnye dobychu i oborot yantarya, nefrita i drugih poludragocennyh kamney // Voprosy rossiyskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava. 2020. T. 10, № 8A. S. 131–142. https://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2020.33.76.018.
11. Minenok M. G., Minenok M. M., Podgornyy N. A. Yantarnoe proizvodstvo v Rossii: kriminologicheskie i ugolovno-pravovye aspekty // Kriminologiya: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. 2013. № 4 (31). S. 56–67.
12. Demchuk S. D., Kokoshin I. M. Sovershenstvovanie pravovogo regulirovaniya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za nezakonnyy oborot poludragocennyh kamney, dragocennyh metallov, dragocennyh kamney i zhemchuga // Zakonodatel'stvo. 2021. № 6. S. 63–70.
13. Volcheckaya T. S. Kriminalisticheskaya situalogiya : monografiya / pod red. N. P. Yablokova. Kaliningrad : Kaliningradskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 1997. 248 s.
14. Osipova E. V. Situacionnyy podhod v rassledovanii ekologicheskih prestupleniy // Soyuz kriminalistov i kriminologov. 2019. № 2. S. 112 – 121. https://doi.org/10.31085/2310-8681-2019-2-222-112-121.
15. Ziberova O. S. Otdel'nye voprosy protivodeystviya nezakonnoy dobyche yantarya // Vestnik Kaliningradskogo filiala Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2018. № 1 (51). S. 36–40.
