from 01.01.2023 until now
Moscow, Moscow, Russian Federation
UDK 343.851.3 Сообщение об имеющихся возможностях
Introduction. The article deals with the issues of effectiveness of one of the directions of police activity in the sphere of special prevention of offences – the suppression of the most dangerous violent encroachments, infliction of harm when apprehending a person having committed a crime, through the use of physical force, special means and firearms by police officers. The lack of consistency in legal regulation, in particular, in the conditions of legality of necessary defence in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and the Federal Law of 7 February 2011 No.3 “On Police”, leads to interbranch competition of non-contradictory norms of different branches of law, regulating analogous social relations in the sphere of protection of a person and the rights of the defeated or other persons, but with a different degree of specification of the legal prescription. In a number of cases, the current situation leads to a decrease in the effectiveness of the protection of an individual from violent encroachments, the appearance of possible negative consequences for the personal safety of an official himself protected by the state from legal injustice and court errors. Methods and Results. Based on the ideas on the dialectical connection between the state policy in the sphere of counteraction to crime and criminal law, the author critically assesses the system of legal regulation of the use of measures of special prevention of violent offences on the example of the use of firearms by police officers in the situation of necessary defence. With the use of axiological, logical-legal methods and content analysis the author’s variant of comprehensive approach to improving the mechanism of counteraction to violent offences through criminal-legal measures is given. This author’s alternative is brought for discussion by specialists of criminal-legal profile.
violent assaults, police, measures of special prevention, necessary defence, competition of law
1. Vasil'ev P. V. O primenenii teorii mehanizma pravovogo regulirovaniya dlya resheniya otdel'nyh problem operativno-sluzhebnoy deyatel'nosti sotrudnikov policii // Nauchnyy portal MVD Rossii. – 2015. –№ 4 (32). – S. 102–106.
2. Damm I. A. Politika protivodeystviya prestupnosti kak novaya paradigma vzaimodeystviya obschestva i gosudarstva // Zhurnal Sibirskogo federal'nogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki. – 2024. – № 17 (1). – S. 12–27.
3. Kutyakin S. A. Nekotorye aspekty sovremennogo sostoyaniya razrabotki ponyatiya «Protivodeystvie prestupnosti» v yuridicheskoy nauke i zakonodatel'noy praktike // Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravoohranitel'naya praktika. – 2009. – № 2 (8). – S. 40–51.
4. Hotin O. V. Preduprezhdenie nasil'stvennoy prestupnosti organami vnutrennih del Central'nogo federal'nogo okruga // Vestnik Voronezhskogo instituta MVD Rossii. – 2009. – № 2. – S. 4–9.
5. Schegoleva N. V. Policiya i obschestvo: sistema i lyudi // Molodoy uchenyy. – 2013. – № 2 (49). – S. 267–269.
6. Careva E. S. Proyavlenie nasiliya v mezhlichnostnyh konfliktah kak psihologicheskaya problema // Obschestvo: sociologiya, psihologiya, pedagogika. – 2018. – № 6 (50). – S. 44–48; https://doi.org/10.24158/spp.2018.6.7.
7. Mirzaeva D. M., Mirzaev M. A. Mesto i rol' policii v sisteme pravoohranitel'nyh organov Rossiyskoy Federacii // Zakon i pravo. – 2022. – № 2. – S. 68–70; https://doi.org/10.24412/2073-3313-2022-2-68-70.
8. Belyakovich E. V. Ponyatie i predely pravovogo regulirovaniya // Sibirskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik. – 2006. – № 4 (35). – S. 3–9.
9. Klimenko A. I. Policiya kak element institucional'nogo urovnya mehanizma pravovoy ideologii v usloviyah sovremennogo politicheski organizovannogo obschestva // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. – 2016. – № 3. – S. 34–36.
10. Hun A. Z. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya neobhodimoy oborony v deyatel'nosti policii // Vestnik Krasnodarskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. – 2015. – № 4 (30). – S. 84–87.
11. Tihanova N. E. Problemnye aspekty primeneniya oruzhiya v sostoyanii neobhodimoy oborony // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo. – 2018. – № 1 (32). – S. 186–190.
12. Husainova O. V. Defekty v pravoprimenitel'noy deyatel'nosti organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti: prichiny, usloviya, faktory // Aktual'nye problemy yuridicheskoy nauki : sbornik nauchnyh trudov. – Tol'yatti: TGU, 2008. – Vyp. 5. – S. 84–95.
13. Senyakin I. N. Tehniko-yuridicheskie predposylki konkurencii norm rossiyskogo prava // Yuridicheskaya tehnika. – 2008. – № 2. – S. 10–17.
14. Luneev V. V. Prestupnost' HH veka: mirovye, regional'nye i rossiyskie tendencii : monografiya. – 2 e izd., pererab. i dop. – Moskva: Norma, 2021. – 912 s.
15. Kuznecova N. F. Effektivnost' ugolovno-pravovyh norm i yazyk zakona // Socialisticheskaya zakonnost'. – 1973. – № 3. – S. 29–33.
16. Tihomirov Yu. A. Upravlenie na osnove prava. – Moskva: Formula prava, 2007. – 484 s.
17. Garapon A. Hranitel' obeschaniy: sud i demokratiya / avt. predisl. P. Riker; per. s fr. G. V. Churshukov; nauch. red. A. I. Kovler. – Moskva: Nota Bene, 2004. – 328 s.
18. Titushkina E. Yu., Cepelev V. F. Pravovoe obespechenie preduprezhdeniya prestupleniy: problemy zakonodatel'nogo regulirovaniya i puti resheniya / Problemy pravoohranitel'noy deyatel'nosti na sovremennom etape : sbornik trudov Vserossiyskoy (s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem) nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, 22–23 aprelya 2022 g. / otv. red. V. V. Gruzdev, G. G. Bril'. – Kostroma: Kostromskoy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 2022. – S. 150–154.
19. Milyukov S. F., Pobegaylo E. F. Aktual'nye problemy primeneniya oruzhiya sotrudnikami pravoohranitel'nyh organov // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. – 2006. – № 11. – S. 39.
