Moscow, Moscow, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
UDK 159.9.07 Психологические исследования
GRNTI 15.00 ПСИХОЛОГИЯ
Relevance. The article is devoted to the problem of teachers’ evaluation of risk indicators of aggressive behavior involvement among adolescents. The paper examines the problem of the dependence of the involvement risk assessment on the personal characteristics of the teacher, especially, locus of control. Aim. To assess the relationship between the level of the teacher’s locus of control and their perception of the markers of victimization of adolescents. Materials and Methods. The sample consisted of 4.453 school teachers (94 % are female). The participants are residents of seven regions of the Russian Federation. The method “Level of Subjective Control” (“LSC”) by E. F. Bazhin, E. A. Golynkina, A. M. Etkind was used. To assess teachers’ perceptions of victimization markers, the authors analyzed the answers to the question “How do you usually recognize that the child is suffering aggression?” The question is included in the standardized questionnaire of the Center for Socialization, Family and Prevention of Antisocial Behavior Research of the Moscow State Pedagogical University. Results. The data analysis revealed that teachers who marked the options proposed in the questionnaire as the markers of adolescent victimization have statistically significantly higher scores (higher absolute values) on various subjective locus control scales. Conclusion. Teachers who tend to internality have significantly higher scores on various markers of victimization as indicators of adolescents’ involvement in aggressive behavior.
social perception, locus of control, teachers, aggression, risk indicators
1. Bochaver A. A. Travlya v detskom kollektive: ustanovki i vozmozhnosti uchiteley // Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovaniye psyedu.ru : setevoy zhurnal. – 2014. – T. 6. – № 1. – S. 47–55. – URL: http://psyedu.ru/journal/2014/1/Bochaver.phtml data obrashcheniya: 09.11.2022).
2. Novikova M. A., Rean A. A. Vliyaniye shkol’nogo klimata na vozniknoveniye travli: otechestvennyy i zarubezhnyy opyt issledovaniya // Voprosy obrazovaniya. – 2019. – №. 2. – S. 78–97; https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2019-2-78-97.
3. Rean A. A. Profilaktika agressii i asotsial’nosti nesovershennoletnikh // Natsional’nyy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal. – 2018. – №. 2 (30). – S. 3–12; https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2018.0201.
4. Rean A. A., Kosheleva Ye. S. Rol’ koping-strategiy i PPI v protsesse vzaimodeystviya uchiteley s agressivnymi podrostkami // Psikhologiya i pedagogika sluzhebnoy deyatel’nosti. – 2021. – №. 3. – S. 78–86; https://doi.org/10.24412/2658-638X-2021-3-78-86.
5. Rean A. A., Kosheleva Ye. S. Agressiya i asotsial’noye povedeniye podrostkov v soznanii pedagogov // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. – 2021. – №. 4. – S. 305–312; https://doi.org/10.24412/2073-0454-2021-4-305-312.
6. Yoon J., Sulkowski M. L., Bauman S. A. Teachers’ responses to bullying incidents: Effects of teacher characteristics and contexts //Journal of school violence. – 2016. – Vol. 15. – No. 1. – P. 91–113; https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.963592.
7. Sobkin V. S., Fomichenko A. S. Ponimaniye uchitelyami prichin proyavleniya agressii uchashchikhsya k pedagogu / Sotsiologiya obrazovaniya. Trudy po sotsiologii obrazovaniya sbornike statey / pod redaktsiyey V. S. Sobkina. – Moskva: Federal’noye gosudarstvennoye nauchnoye uchrezhdeniye «Institut sotsiologii obrazovaniya» Rossiyskoy akademii obrazovaniya, 2012. – T. XVI. – Vyp. XXVIII. – S. 137–147. Ser.: Sotsiokul’turnyye problemy sovremennogo obrazovaniya.
8. Rean A. A., Kosheleva Ye. S. Svyaz’ predstavleniy pedagogov o vozrastnykh osobennostyakh agressii podrostkov so sposobami ikh reagirovaniya na agressivno-konfliktnoye povedeniye uchashchikhsya // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. – 2022. – №. 6. – S. 312–319; https://doi.org/10.24412/2073-0454-2022-6-312-319.
9. Fomichenko A. S. Predstavleniya uchiteley o prichinakh agressivnogo povedeniya uchashchikhsya raznykh klassov obshcheobrazovatel’noy shkoly //Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo. – 2013. – T. 4. – №. 2. – S. 81–93.
10. Volkova Ye. N., Tsvetkova L. A., Volkova I. V. Metodologicheskiye osnovaniya dlya razrabotki programm profilaktiki podrostkovogo bullinga //Sibirskiy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal. – 2019. – №. 74. – S. 88–100; https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/74/5.
11. Rean A. A., Kosheleva Ye. S. Svyaz’ predstavleniy pedagogov o polovykh osobennostyakh agressii podrostkov so sposobami ikh reagirovaniya na agressivno-konfliktnoye povedeniye uchashchikhsya// Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. – 2022. – №. 5. – S. 366–376; https://doi.org/10.24412/2073-0454-2022-5-366-376.
12. Rotter J. B. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement // Psychological monographs: General and Applied. – 1966. – Vol. 80. – No. 1. – P. 1–28; https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976.
13. Pantileyev C. R. Metody izmereniya lokusa kontrolya / Obshchaya psikhodiagnostika : osnovy psikhodiagnostiki, nemedlennoy psikhoterapii i psikhologicheskogo konsul’tirovaniya : uchebnoye posobiye / A. A. Bodalev [i dr.] ; pod red. A. A. Bodaleva, V. V. Stolina. – Moskva: Izdatel’stvo MGU, 1987. – S. 278–285.
14. Rusbandi N., Usman O. Effect of Self Effication, Locus of Control, and Emotional Intelligence on Procrastination // SSRN : Electronic Journal : [Online]; https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3646005. – URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3646005 (data obrashcheniya: 09.11.2022).
15. Kim N. R., Lee K. H. The effect of Internal Locus of Control on Career Adaptability: The Mediating Role of Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy and Occupational Engagement // Journal of Employment Counseling. – No 55 (1). P. 2–15; https://doi.org/10.1002/joec.12069.
16. Türk-Kurtça T., Kocatürk M. The Role of Childhood Traumas, Emotional Self-Efficacy and Internal-External Locus of Control in Predicting Psychological Resilience // International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies. – 2020. – Vol. 8. – No 3. – P. 105–115; https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.8n.3p.105.
17. Muzdybayev K. Psikhologiya otvetstvennosti : monografiya / pod red. V. Ye. Semenova. – Leningrad: Nauka, 1983. – 264 s.
18. Rean A. A. Psikhologiya lichnosti. –Sankt-Peterburg: Piter, 2016. – 286 s.
19. Pesudo D., Anakonda C. The effect of ethical climate and locus of control toward whistleblowing intention // Jurnal AKSI (Akuntansi dan Sistem Informasi). – 2022. – Vol. 7. – No 1. – P. 52–61; https://doi.org/10.32486/aksi.v7i1.248.
20. Camadan F., Sari S. V. Forgiveness, Locus of Control, and Perfectionism: A Mixed Method Study // International Journal of Progressive Education. – 2021. – T. 17. – №. 1. – S. 210–231. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2021.329.14.
21. Strong S. L., Gore J. S. The mediating role of locus of control between social resource stability and psychological well‐being // Journal of applied social psychology. – 2020. – Vol. 50. – Issue 8. – P. 464–475; https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12674.
22. Padmanabhan S. The impact of locus of control on workplace stress and job satisfaction: A pilot study on private-sector employees // Current Research in Behavioral Sciences : [Online]. – 2021. – T. 2. – C. 100026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbeha.2021.100026.
23. Levy M., Gumpel T. P. Self-efficacy and external locus of control as predictors of participant roles in relational aggression // Journal of interpersonal violence. – 2022. – Vol. 37. – No 5–6. – P. 3015–3040; https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605209437.
24. Zeyin Y., Long S., Gaoxiao R. Effects of safe driving climate among friends on prosocial and aggressive driving behaviors of young drivers: The moderating role of traffic locus of control // Journal of safety research. – 2022. – Vol. 81. – P. 297–304; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2022.03.006.
25. Rean A. A., Baranov A. A. Faktory stressoustoychivosti uchiteley // Voprosy psikhologii. – 1997. – №. 1. – S. 45–54.
26. Rean A. A., Konovalov I. A. Otsenka pedagogami podrostkovoy agressivnosti: sotsial’nopertseptivnyye aspekty i gotovnost’ k vmeshatel’stvu // Rossiyskiy deviantologicheskiy zhurnal. – 2021. – №. 1 (2). – S. 276–295; https://doi.org/10.35750/2713-0622-2021-2-276-295
27. Rean A. A., Konovalov I. A., Kosheleva Ye. S. Sovladaniye pedagoga s destruktivnym povedeniyem uchashchikhsya: reaktsiya na agressiyu uchashchikhsya i agressivnost’ pedagogov // Integratsiya obrazovaniya. – 2022. – T. 26. – №. 4 (109). – S. 688–707; https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.109.026.202204.688-707.
28. Bratus’ B. S. K probleme cheloveka v psikhologii // Voprosy psikhologii. – 1997. – № 5. – S. 3–19.
29. Ushinskiy K. D. O pol’ze pedagogicheskoy literatury : [iz «Sobraniya pedagogicheskikh sochineniy». – Sankt-Peterburg: tip. M. Merkusheva, 1895. – 29 s.
