Russian Federation
UDK 343.36 Преступления против правосудия
Introduction. Damages from crimes in 2022 (for completed and suspended criminal cases) amounted to 748.3 billion roubles. Article 312 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is designed to ensure the proper functioning of the law enforcement system for the execution of punishment or compensation of damages. There are theoretical and practical problems in qualifying offences under paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 312 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. These problems increase the risk of harm to justice, and also make it difficult or impossible to execute court decisions (in enforcement proceedings), to compensate for damages caused by a crime or other offence, to carry out confiscation of property imposed by a court verdict. Methods. The following cognitive methods serve as a methodological basis for the study: system structural, descriptive-analytical and statistical methods, the application of which made it possible to study the crimes under Article 312 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Results. As a conclusion the author formulates proposals for improving the current law enforcement practice of qualification of illegal actions in relation to property subjected to inventory, seizure or confiscation. The author considers types of property that cannot be the subject of an offence under Article 312 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The cases when the investigated acts should be qualified under the totality of crimes - the norms in question (Art. 312 of the Criminal Code of the RF) and the relevant articles of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation were revealed.
crimes against justice, seizure of property, confiscation, execution of punishment, compensation for damages, execution of a court decision
1. Dvoryanskov I. V. Nezakonnye deystviya v otnoshenii imuschestva, podvergnutogo opisi ili arestu libo podlezhaschego konfiskacii / Ugolovno-ispolnitel'naya sistema: pedagogika, psihologiya i pravo : materialy Vseros. nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, Tomsk 19-20 aprelya 2018 g.: v 2 ch. / pod obsch. red. V. A. Utkina, vyp. 6. - Tomsk: FKU DPO Tomskiy IPKR FSIN Rossii, 2018. - Ch. 1. - S. 115-121.
2. Gel'dibaev M. H. Kvalifikaciya prestupleniy protiv pravosudiya : monografiya. - Sankt-Peterburg: Centr nauchno-proizvodstvennyh tehnologiy «Asterion», 2021. - 104 s.
3. Kuleshov Yu. I. Prestupleniya protiv pravosudiya: problemy teorii, zakonotvorchestva i pravoprimeneniya : monografiya. - Vladivostok: Izdatel'stvo Dal'nevostochnogo universiteta, 2007. - 296 s.
4. Metel'skiy P. S., Verchenko N. I. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za zavedomo nepravosudnye prigovor, reshenie ili inoy sudebnyy akt // Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo. - 2020. - T. 17. - № 3. - S. 93-102.
5. Korobeev A. I., Kuleshov Yu. I. Budet li vostrebovana st. 312 UK RF posle vosstanovleniya konfiskacii imuschestva? // Ugolovnoe pravo. - 2007. - № 2. - S. 55-58.
6. Druzin A. Dispoziciya st. 312 UK RF trebuet utochneniya // Zakonnost'. - 2002. - № 10. - S. 12-16.
7. Laptev D. B. O sovershenstvovanii instituta konfiskacii imuschestva v ugolovnom prave Rossii // Vestnik Dal'nevostochnogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. - 2018. - № 3. - S. 39-44.
8. Bavsun M. V., Nikolaev K. D., Samoylova S. Yu. Konfiskaciya imuschestva v rossiyskom ugolovnom zakonodatel'stve : monografiya. - Moskva: Yurlitinform, 2016. - S. 240 s.
9. Suchkov Yu. I. Konfiskaciyu imuschestva neobhodimo vozvratit' v ugolovnoe zakonodatel'stvo Rossiyskoy Federacii v vide mery nakazaniya / V Baltiyskiy yuridicheskiy forum «Zakon i pravoporyadok v tret'em tysyacheletii» : materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. - Kaliningrad: Kaliningradskiy filial Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii, 2017. - S. 193-195.
10. Veklenko V. V., Borkov V. N. Rasshiritel'noe tolkovanie prevysheniya dolzhnostnyh polnomochiy // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. - 2019. - № 6. - S. 48-51.
11. Veklenko S. V., Vinogradov D. Problemy otgranicheniya prestupleniy, predusmotrennyh ch. 1 st. 312 UK RF ot smezhnyh i konkuriruyuschih sostavov prestupleniy // Ugolovnoe pravo. - 2007. - № 5. - S. 12-16.
12. Shveyger A. O. Problemnye voprosy ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za sovershenie nezakonnyh deystviy v otnoshenii imuschestva, podvergnutogo opisi ili arestu (st. 312 UK RF) // Vestnik Dal'nevostochnogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. - 2019. - № 4 (49). - S. 17-22.
13. Plaksina T. A. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za nezakonnye deystviya v otnoshenii imuschestva, podvergnutogo opisi ili arestu libo podlezhaschego konfiskacii (st. 312 UK RF) : monografiya. - Baranul: Izd-vo Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2007. - 93 s.
14. Kashapov R. M. Special'nye mery preduprezhdeniya prestupleniy protiv pravosudiya / Sistema profilaktiki prestupnosti: sovremennoe sostoyanie, problemy i perspektivy razvitiya : materialy Ezhegodnogo mezhvedomstvennogo kruglogo stola. Sankt-Peterburg, 25 oktyabrya 2017 goda / sost.: Klishkov V. B., Sagaydak A. Yu., Pavlik E. M. - Sankt-Peterburg: Izd-vo SPb un-ta MVD Rossii, 2017. - S. 70-75.
15. Lobanova L., Surkova O. Dobrovol'naya sdacha predmetov, nahodyaschihsya v nezakonnom vladenii lica, sovershivshego prestuplenie, kak smyagchayuschee nakazanie obstoyatel'stvo // Ugolovnoe pravo. - Moskva: ANO «Yuridicheskie programmy», 2014. - № 2. - S. 46-52.
