employee from 01.01.2019 until now
Omsk, Omsk, Russian Federation
UDK 342.98 Право должностных лиц
Introduction. Driving a disabled vehicle with windscreens equipped with windows which light transmission does not comply with the requirements of the technical regulations on safety provides for administrative liability under Part 3.1 of Article 12.5 of the RF Code of Administrative Offences. The requirements issued by road safety police officers to stop unlawful actions have no clear legislative regulation; there are no sanctions in case ofreoffending. The purpose of the study is to determine the feature of the objective side of the administrative offence under Part 1 of Article 19.3 of the RF Code of Administrative Offences, when using a car with insufficient light transmission of windows. Methods. The methodological basis of the study is formed by dialectical method of cognition as a fundamental method of scientific analysis of the social and legal reality, as well as general scientific methods of research: theoretical analysis, comparative study of law, technical and legal analysis, specification, clarification and interpretation. Results. According to the legal experience, drivers who disobeyed orders to remove the vehicle malfunction and repeatedly reoffended under Part 3.1 of Article 12.5 of the RF Code of Administrative Offenceshave become subject to administrative liability in accordance with Part 1 of Article 19.3 of the RF Code of Administrative Offences. If a police officer has violatedthe procedure, the judicial authorities stop proceedings due to the lack of evidentiary support based on which the decree was issued. Conclusion. The legal basis for bringing a person to administrative liability under Part 1 of Article 19.3 of the RF Code of Administrative Offences comes into existence at the moment of driving a disabled vehicle, in which the operation of vehicles is prohibited in accordance with the Highway Code. Driving a vehicle with windows, the light transmission of which does not meet the requirements of the technical regulations on the safety of wheeled vehicles, is a violation of the Highway Code. Disobedience to the lawful demand of a police officer to stop the operation of a vehicle with insufficient light transmission of windows shall form the objective side of an administrative offence under Part 1 of Article 19.3 of the RF Code of Administrative Offences.
car, windows, light transmission, administrative offence, disobedience, administrative liability
1. Litvinov A. V., Knyazev K. S., Bochkarnikov A. V. [i dr.]. Vliyanie svetopropuskaemosti stekol transportnogo sredstva na lichnuyu bezopasnost' uchastnikov dorozhnogo dvizheniya / Gosudarstvo i pravo: problemy i perspektivy sovershenstvovaniya: sbornik nauchnyh trudov 2-y Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferencii, Kursk, 14 noyabrya 2019 goda. – Kursk: Yugo-Zapadnyy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 2019. – S. 91–94.
2. Manoylina S. Z., Rudakov P. A., Sazonov S. N. Solncezaschitnye ustroystva mobil'nyh transportnyh sredstv / Nauka i obrazovanie na sovremennom etape razvitiya: opyt, problemy i puti ih resheniya: materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, Voronezh, 25 noyabrya 2021 goda. – Voronezh: Voronezhskiy gosudarstvennyy agrarnyy universitet im. Imperatora Petra I, 2021. – S. 437–445.
3. Cehosh S. I., Cehosh P. I., Zhundubaev R. R. Vliyanie atermal'noy tonirovochnoy plenki na bezopasnost' zhiznedeyatel'nosti i bezopasnost' dorozhnogo dvizheniya / Start v nauke – 2023 : sbornik statey Mezhdunarodnogo nauchno-issledovatel'skogo konkursa, Penza, 20 yanvarya 2023 goda. – Penza: Nauka i Prosveschenie, 2023. – S. 36–41.
4. Bazhko S. I., Soboleva Yu. V. Voprosy administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za tonirovanie stekol v avtomobile / Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya Rossii: molodezhnyy vzglyad v buduschee : sbornik nauchnyh statey 2-y Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferencii, Kursk, 17–18 oktyabrya 2019 goda / Yugo-Zapadnyy gosudarstvennyy universitet, Moskovskiy politehnicheskiy universitet, Ryazanskiy gosudarstvennyy agrotehnologicheskiy universitet imeni P. A. Kostycheva. – Kursk: Yugo-Zapadnyy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 2019. – T. 2. – S. 149–151.
5. Volkov P. A., Demchenko N. V., Sarychev A. V. Aktual'nye voprosy privlecheniya lic k administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za upravlenie transportnym sredstvom, na kotorom ustanovleny stekla (v tom chisle pokrytye prozrachnymi cvetnymi plenkami), svetopropuskanie kotoryh ne sootvetstvuet trebovaniyam tehnicheskogo reglamenta o bezopasnosti kolesnyh transportnyh sredstv // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve. – 2019. – № 7.– S. 188–191.
6. Andreev P. G. Nekotorye osobennosti privlecheniya k administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za narushenie pravil ekspluatacii transportnogo sredstva s tonirovannymi steklami // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. – 2022. – № 2. – S. 61–66.
7. Popov V. A. Problemy proizvodstva del po administrativnym pravonarusheniyam, predusmotrennym ch. 1 st. 12.5 KoAP RF, ch. 3.1 st. 12.5 KoAP RF, ch. 1 st. 19.3 KoAP RF / Problemy formirovaniya pravovogo social'nogo gosudarstva v sovremennoy Rossii: materialy XVIII Vserossiyskoy nacional'noy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, Novosibirsk, 02–03 dekabrya 2022 goda. – Novosibirsk: Izdatel'skiy centr Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta «Zolotoy kolos», 2022. – S. 167–169.
8. Telegin A. S., Tiunova N. V. Povtornost' soversheniya administrativnogo pravonarusheniya // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki. – 2019. – № 46. – S. 626–650.
9. Mayorov V. I., Korkin A. V. Administrativnoe prinuzhdenie: ponyatie, mesto i formy vyrazheniya // Pravoporyadok: istoriya, teoriya, praktika. – 2016. – № 4 (11). – S. 8–20.
10. Denisenko V. V., Mayorov V. I. Vozvraschayas' k voprosu ob obschestvennoy opasnosti administrativnyh pravonarusheniy v oblasti dorozhnogo dvizheniya // Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravoohranitel'naya praktika. – 2022. – № 4 (62). – S. 16–24.
11. Bornovolokov P. A. Ob administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za narusheniya, predusmotrennye stat'ey 12.5 KoAP RF // Bezopasnost' dorozhnogo dvizheniya. – 2021. – № 3. – S. 43–50.
12. Barakovskiy V. V. O probleme primeneniya chasti 1 stat'i 19.3 KoAP RF za nepovinovenie trebovaniyu sotrudnika policii prekratit' ekspluatirovat' avtomobil' s tonirovkoy // Problemy pravoohranitel'noy deyatel'nosti. – 2022. – № 1. – S. 22–27.
13. Dobrenkov A. I. Vstuplenie postanovleniya po delu ob administrativnom pravonarushenii, vynesennoe sotrudnikom GIBDD MVD Rossii: aktual'nye problemy i perspektivy // Upravlenie deyatel'nost'yu po obespecheniyu bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya: sostoyanie, problemy, puti sovershenstvovaniya. – 2020. – № 1 (3). – S. 153–158.
14. Koryc S. I., Bokova I. B. Aktual'nost' formuly rascheta effektivnosti administrativnogo nakazaniya // Zakon i pravo. – 2021. – № 6. – S. 201–203.
15. Altuhov S. A. Problemnye aspekty naznacheniya nakazaniya za upravlenie avtomobilem s tonirovannymi steklami / Gosudarstvo, pravo i obschestvo: voprosy teorii i praktiki : materialy II Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, Sochi, 07–08 fevralya 2020 goda / otv. redaktor V. I. Skryabin. – Sochi, Izdatel'stvo: Individual'nyy predprinimatel' Nefedov Dmitriy Vladimirovich (Rostov-na-Donu) 2020. – S. 323–329.
16. Aliev A. G. Problemy primeneniya st. 19.3 KoAP pri narushenii Pravil dorozhnogo dvizheniya // Zakonnost'. – 2018. – № 11. – S. 25–27.
