from 01.01.2022 to 01.01.2022
UDK 340 Право в целом. Пропедевтика. Методы и вспомогательные правовые науки
Introduction. In the context of the recent COVID-19 pandemic events, Michel Foucault’s concept of “biopolitics” has received renewed attention. Its main idea is the desire to control not only and not so much the social, but also the biological side of human life – by a legitimate authority. The aim of the article is to try to update the Foucault concept from the perspective of the general theory and philosophy of law. The article raises the question of how the actions of power institutions in the context of implementation of “biopolitics” correlate to the theoretical and legal concept of “the limits of legal regulation”. Methods. In addition to general scientific methods of cognition (comparison, analogy, analysis, synthesis, abstraction; collectively – general logical methods), this study applies the following special methods of legal sciences: dogmatic method (formal-legal), interpretation and problem-theoretical reconstruction. Results. The article concludes that in the process of implementation of ”biopolitical” strategies the theoretical and legal construction of “the limits of legal regulation” undergoes significant changes. From this perspective, the actions of governing bodies do not exceed the permissible limits of legal regulation. Michel Foucault’s concept of ‘biopolitics’ allows analysing legal phenomena without distancing from the facts of social reality.
biopolitics, Michel Foucault, Giorgio Agamben, COVID-19 pandemic, limits of legal regulation, legal theory
1. Alasaniya K. Yu. Filosofskaya koncepciya biovlasti: istoki i perspektivy // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. - Seriya 7: Filosofiya. - 2018. - № 4. - S. 70-77.
2. Antipov A. V. Biopolitika, biokapitalizm i biosocial'nost': stanovlenie i razvitie ponyatiy // Chelovek. - 2019. - T. 30. - № 6. - S. 174-186.
3. Berezina E. A. Predely pravovogo regulirovaniya obschestvennyh otnosheniy: problemy ponimaniya, klassifikaciya i znachenie v mehanizme pravovogo regulirovaniya // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. - 2020. - T. 15. - № 4 (113). - S. 42-55.
4. Brezhnev O. V. Problema «antikovidnyh» pravoogranicheniy v resheniyah Konstitucionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. - 2022. - T. 17. - № 2 (135). - S. 32-39.
5. Gutorov V. A. Biovlast' i politicheskoe: aktual'nye aspekty sovremennyh diskussiy // Vlast' i elity. - 2021. - T. 8. - № 2. - S. 189-201.
6. Dimitrova S. V., Ovdina K. S. Svoboda i nezavisimost' v period pandemii // Logos et Praxis. - 2021. - T. 20. - № 2. - S. 39-47.
7. Dmitrik N. A. Predely pravovogo regulirovaniya v cifrovuyu epohu // Informacionnoe obschestvo. - 2020. - № 3. - S. 47-58.
8. Karchagin E. V. Spravedlivost' v usloviyah pandemii COVID-19: mobil'nostnyy kapital i novyy social'nyy poryadok // Logos et Praxis. - 2021. - T. 20. - № 2. - S. 31-38.
9. Kobylin I. I. Istok i singulyarnost': Dzh. Agamben i M. Fuko o rozhdenii biovlasti // Filosofiya i obschestvo. - 2011. - № 3 (63). - S. 171-183.
10. Mihel' D. V. Intellektualy obsuzhdayut pandemiyu COVID-19: diskussii o koronaviruse kak novoe kul'turnoe yavlenie // Etnograficheskoe obozrenie. - 2021. - № 6. - S. 64-82.
11. Pogonyaylo A. G. Biopolitika: kontekst i tekst filosofii // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Filosofiya i konfliktologiya. - 2020. - T. 36. - Vyp. 4. - S. 657-674.
12. Samovol'nova O. V. Social'no-filosofskiy analiz osnovnyh koncepciy biopolitiki: M. Fuko, Dzh. Agamben, A. Negri // Vestnik RGGU. Seriya «Filosofiya. Sociologiya. Iskusstvovedenie». - 2017. - № 4-2 (10). - S. 261-271.
13. Somin I. D. Biopolitika v seti: ot real'nogo k cifrovomu // Lichnost'. Kul'tura. Obschestvo. - 2022. - T. 24. - № 2 (114). - S. 123-131.
14. Habibulin T. M. Spasenie tradicii. O metodologii politiko-pravovogo proekta Dzhordzho Agambena // Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. - 2020. - T. 15. - № 4. - S. 127-150.
15. Denisenko V., Trikoz E. Biopolitics and legal issues of emergency situations in the context of coronavirus pandemic // XIII International Scientific and Practical Conference «State and Prospects for the Development of Agribusiness - INTERAGROMASH 2020». Rostovon-Don, 26-28 fevralya 2020 goda https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202017514013.
16. Højme P. Biopolitics and the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Foucauldian Interpretation of the Danish Government’s Response to the Pandemic // Philosophies. - 2022. - № 7(2), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies7020034.
17. Larocque C. and Foth, T. Which lives are worth saving? Biolegitimacy and harm reduction during COVID-19 // April 2021Nursing Inquiry 28(4): e12417. - 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12417.
18. Makarychev A., Romashko T. Precarious Sovereignty in a Post-liberal Europe: The COVID-19 Emergency in Estonia and Finland // Chin. Polit. Sci. Rev. - 2021. - № 6. - PP. 63-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-020-00165-y.
