Peculiarities of the formation of the criminal-legal impact on driving while under the influence of alcohol
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
State policy in the field of road safety is aimed at protecting the life, health and property of citizens and protecting the interests of society and the state by preventing road accidents and reducing the severity of their consequences. In searching for mechanisms to implement these goals, the legislator to the challenges in the field of road safety, which contribute to road accidents. The article examines the trends in criminal law responses to driving under the influence of alcohol. The criteria for criminalisation of an act under article 2641 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation are disclosed. The author focuses on the disclosure of public danger of the act, drawing attention to the existing shortcomings in law enforcement, as well as assesses the effectiveness of the application of Art. 2641 of the Criminal Code in solving the issues of road safety. Based on the results of the study, the author concludes that there is an effective potential of the criminal law prohibition of driving a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol by a person who has been subjected to administrative penalty or has a criminal record. The author proposes the introduction of amendments to the criminal law legislation, aimed at strengthening the measures of criminal law impact on persons operating a vehicle in a state of intoxication.

Keywords:
safety, road traffic, criminalisation, criminal law, criminal-legal influence, driving, intoxication, vehicle
Text
Publication text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Baranchikova M. V. Osobennosti ugolovno-pravovoy ocenki lic, upravlyayuschih transportnymi sredstvami v sostoyanii op'yaneniya // Pravoporyadok: istoriya, teoriya, praktika. - 2019. - № 2 (21). - S. 33-38.

2. Osokin R. B., Kokorev V. G. K voprosu o povyshenii intensivnosti kriminalizacii deyaniya, sopryazhennogo s narusheniem pravil dorozhnogo dvizheniya licom, podvergnutym administrativnomu nakazaniyu (st. 2641 UK RF) // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. - 2021. - № 2. - S. 121-124.

3. Bavsun M. V., Veklenko S. V., Fatkullina M. B. Ob'ektivnost' i celesoobraznost' nekotoryh form vinovnogo vmeneniya v ugolovnom prave // Pravovedenie. - 2006. - № 6. - S. 125-135.

4. Bavsun M. V., Bavsun I. G. Problemy kvalifikacii prestupleniy v sfere ekonomicheskoy deyatel'nosti so smeshannoy protivopravnost'yu // Nauchnyy vestnik Omskoy akademii MVD Rossii. - 2008. - № 1 (28). - S. 8-11.

5. Vishnyakova N. V. Prestupleniya s administrativnoy preyudiciey: problemy, zakonodatel'nogo i pravoprimenitel'nogo haraktera // Vestnik Sibirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. - 2019. - № 1 (34). - S. 5-12.

6. Bavsun M. V. Ponyatie i soderzhanie ugolovno-pravovogo vozdeystviya na prestupnost' // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. - 2010. - № 336. - S. 99-102.

7. Il'in I. V., Shevchenko O. A. Problemy realizacii instituta administrativnoy preyudicii pri kvalifikacii i rassledovanii narusheniya pravil dorozhnogo dvizheniya licom, podvergnutym administrativnomu nakazaniyu (st. 2641 UK RF) // Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii. - 2016. - № 2 (34). - S. 156-161.

8. Bakishev K. A. Normativnoe Postanovlenie Verhovnogo Suda Respubliki Kazahstan «O praktike primeneniya sudami ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva po delam o prestupleniyah, svyazannyh s narusheniem pravil dorozhnogo dvizheniya i ekspluatacii transportnyh sredstv» ot 29 iyunya 2011 goda i ugolovnyy zakon // Rossiysko-Aziatskiy pravovoy zhurnal. - 2020. - № 2. - S. 69-75.

9. Reshnyak M. G. K voprosu o celesoobraznosti vvedeniya v UK RF sostava prestupleniya s administrativnoy preyudiciey na primere kriminalizacii narusheniya pravil dorozhnogo dvizheniya licom, podvergnutym administrativnomu nakazaniyu // Sovremennoe pravo. - 2020. - № 2. - S. 69-73.

10. Kleymenov M. P. Profanaciya ugolovnoy politiki // Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya «Pravo». - 2017. - № 3 (52). - S. 131-134.

11. Shkelya O. V. Pravovoy analiz otvetstvennosti za upravlenie transportnym sredstvom v sostoyanii op'yaneniya // Obschestvo i pravo. - 2020. - № 3 (73). - S. 94-96.

12. Il'in I. V., Shevchenko O. A. Problemy kvalifikacii i rassledovaniya prestupleniy, otvetstvennost' za kotorye predusmotrena st. 2641 UK RF «Narushenie pravil dorozhnogo dvizheniya licom, podvergnutym administrativnomu nakazaniyu» (administrativno-pravovye i ugolovno-pravovye aspekty) // Vestnik NNGU. - 2016. - № 3. - S. 138-142.

13. Ozerov I. N., Rudov D. N., Aleksandrov A. N. K voprosu o rassledovanii prestupleniy, predusmotrennyh st. 2641 UK RF (po materialam UMVD Rossii po Belgorodskoy oblasti) // Problemy pravoohranitel'noy deyatel'nosti. - 2016. - № 3. - S. 67-70.

14. Goncharov I. V. Problema upravleniya transportnym sredstvom: ugolovno-pravovoy aspekt // Vestnik Saratovskoy gosudarstvennoy yuridicheskoy akademii. - 2017. - № 6 (119). - S. 214-218.

15. Goncharov I. V. Nekotorye voprosy kriminalizacii upravleniya transportnym sredstvom v sostoyanii op'yaneniya // Vestnik SGYuA. - 2020. - № 3 (134). - S. 201-207.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?