Kursk, Russian Federation
UDK 343 Уголовное право. Уголовное судопроизводство. Криминология. Криминалистика
Introduction. Currently, responsibility for violating the territorial integrity of Russia is established by Articles 2801 and 2802 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Introduced in 2013, Article 2801 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, which defined responsibility for public calls for actions aimed at violating the territorial integrity of the Russian Federation, caused a discussion in scientific circles, the essence of which boils down to the question of the need to «bud it off» from the «parent» Article 280 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. In 2020 The Criminal Code of the Russian Federation was supplemented by Article 2802, which established responsibility for violating the territorial integrity of our state. Theoretical foundations. Methods. The theoretical basis of this study consists of the work by domestic and foreign experts in the field of the history of the state and law, constitutional law, criminal law. The methodological component is determined by general scientific methods: historical, comparative-legal, the method of analogy, deduction, synthesis and special methods: system-structural, formal-logical and others. The results. Amendments to the criminal legislation regarding the protection of the territorial integrity of the state is a necessary measure that has a pronounced preventive potential in order to eliminate the chance of development of the “color revolution” scenario. The author presents the useful criteria aimed at distinguishing the adjacent norms of the criminal law. The analysis of the certain terms (delimitation, demarcation, redemarkation of the state border) shows the lack of a unified approach to their understanding both in doctrinal sources and international legal documents. Discussion and Conclusion. For a uniform understanding of the criminal law prohibitions defined by Articles 2801, 2802 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, it is necessary to suggest a legal interpretation of a number of terms used in the text of the law. Considering that the legislator uses a linguistic technique “in the absence of signs of crimes” in Article 2802 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, the author justifies the importance of supplementing the list specified by the legislator in the Part 2 of Article 208 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.
criminal rresponsibility, extremism, calls for sovereignty, violence, territorial integrity, delimitation, demarcation, redemarkation
1. Anyanova E. S. K voprosu o prodazhe territorii gosudarstva v mezhdunarodnom prave // Teoriya i praktika obschestvennogo razvitiya. - 2020. - № 8 (150). - S. 94-97.
2. Arhipov A. I. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie aspekty deyatel'nosti Respubliki Belarus' po demarkacii gosudarstvennoy granicy // Vestnik Grodnenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni Yanki Kupaly. Seriya 1. Istoriya i arheologiya. Filosofiya. Politologiya. - 2021. - T. 13. - № 1. - S. 123-135.
3. Biryukova T. A. Kommentariy k Federal'nomu zakonu ot 26 dekabrya 1995 g., № 209-FZ «O geodezii i kartografii» [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Garant» (data obrascheniya: 14.12.2021). Zakon utratil silu s 1 yanvarya 2017 g.
4. Boldyrev O. Yu. Konstitucionnaya reforma v Rossii: aktual'nost', realizaciya, perspektivy. Chast' 2. Popravki k Konstitucii: nereshennye i novye problemy i vektor dal'neyshego reformirovaniya // Konstitucionnoe i municipal'noe pravo. - 2020. - № 12. - S. 3-8.
5. Bondarenko V. M. O nekotoryh aspektah mezhdunarodno-pravovogo oformleniya gosudarstvennyh granic // Sacyyal'na-ekanamіchnyya і pravavyya dasledavannі. - 2007. - № 4. - S. 119-133.
6. Borisov S. V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za publichnye prizyvy k osuschestvleniyu deystviy, napravlennyh na narushenie territorial'noy celostnosti Rossiyskoy Federacii // Yuridicheskaya nauka. - 2014. - № 4. - S. 44-49.
7. Bredihin A. L., Procenko E. D. Gosudarstvennyy suverenitet Rossiyskoy Federacii v svete popravok k Konstitucii Rossiyskoy Federacii, prinyatyh v 2020 g. // Konstitucionnoe i municipal'noe pravo. - 2020. - № 11. - S. 21-23.
8. Gontar' N. V. Secessiya kak proyavlenie otchuzhdeniya obschestva i gosudarstva // Politicheskaya konceptologiya: zhurnal metadisciplinarnyh issledovaniy. - 2015. - № 3. - S. 69-81.
9. Greshnyh A. A., Utkin N. I., Shenshin V. M. O nekotoryh tendenciyah razvitiya rossiyskogo prava, napravlennyh na zaschitu suvereniteta i territorial'noy celostnosti Rossiyskoy Federacii // Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i mestnoe samoupravlenie. - 2021. - № 5. - S. 8-11.
10. Dmitrieva M. O. Sravnitel'nyy analiz uregulirovaniya granicy Rossiyskoy Federacii s Respublikoy Kazahstan i Kitayskoy Narodnoy Respublikoy // Oykumena. Regionovedcheskie issledovaniya. - 2011. - № 3 (18). - S. 40-48.
11. Zlotnikova T. V. Sovremennye problemy Arkticheskogo regiona: priroda, pravo, geopolitika // Ekologicheskoe pravo. - 2017. - № 6. - S. 12-16.
12. Kazilo A. D. Formirovanie gosudarstvennoy granicy Rossiyskoy Federacii s Litovskoy Respublikoy posle raspada SSSR (istoricheskiy i pravovoy aspekty) // Social'no-gumanitarnye znaniya. - 2016. - № 3. - S. 342-347.
13. Kichigin N. V. Mezhdunarodno-pravovoe oformlenie gosudarstvennoy granicy Respubliki Yuzhnaya Osetiya s sopredel'nymi gosudarstvami // Pravo v Vooruzhennyh Silah - Voenno-pravovoe obozrenie. - 2017. - № 7 (240). - S. 105-109.
14. Brilliantov A. V., Galahova A. V., Davydov V. A. [i dr.]. Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federacii. Osobennaya chast'. Razdely X-XII: v 4 t. (postateynyy) / otv. red. V.M. Lebedev. - T. 4. - Moskva: Yurayt, 2017. - 278 s.
15. Bochkareva N. A., Balabina I. V., Kotuhov S. A., Soboleva Yu. V. Kommentariy k Federal'nomu zakonu ot 30 noyabrya 1995 g. № 187-FZ «O kontinental'nom shel'fe Rossiyskoy Federacii» [Elektronnyy resurs] // Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Garant» (data obrascheniya: 14.09.2021).
16. Kostyuchenko A. P. Demarkaciya rossiysko-kitayskoy granicy v zone otvetstvennosti Tihookeanskogo pogranichnogo okruga // Obschestvo: filosofiya, istoriya, kul'tura. - 2017. - № 2. - S. 75-80.
17. Lukin Yu. F. Dogovor mezhdu Rossiey i Norvegiey - shag k mirnomu peredelu morskogo prostranstva Arktiki // Arktika i Sever. - 2011. - № 2. - S. 59-96.
18. Lukashov A. I., Sheveleva S. V., Yakovleva E. O. Pravovaya reglamentaciya v Rossii i Respublike Belarus' konfiskacii imuschestva kak inoy mery ugolovno-pravovogo haraktera // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. - 2019. - № 4 (51). - S. 70-84.
19. Makkambaev P. A. Administrativno-pravovye mery v sisteme obespecheniya pogranichnoy bezopasnosti Respubliki Uzbekistan // Administrativnoe pravo i process. - 2021. - № 10. - S. 59-61.
20. Vasil'ev S. M. [nauch. red.]. Mezhdunarodno-pravovoe oformlenie Gosudarstvennoy granicy Rossiyskoy Federacii: trebovaniya principov mezhdunarodnogo prava. - Moskva, 2000. - 284 s.
21. Melkonyan L. R. Gosudarstvennaya territoriya, gosudarstvennaya granica, sovremennye podhody k ih soderzhaniyu // Nauchnye vesti. - 2020. - № 12 (29). - S. 194-208.
22. Narutto S. V. K voprosu ob izmenenii gosudarstvennoy granicy // Administrativnoe i municipal'noe pravo. - 2012. - № 12 (60). - S. 71-78.
23. Narutto S. V. K voprosu ob izmenenii gosudarstvennoy granicy // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - № 12. - S. 35-50. https://doi.org/10.7256/2306-9945.2013.12.10698.
24. Presnyakov M. V. Zaschita territorial'noy celostnosti - «zhelezobetonnaya popravka» ili kauchukovaya norma: problemy pravovoy opredelennosti // Konstitucionnoe i municipal'noe pravo. - 2021. - № 8. - S. 34-39.
25. Skulakov R. M. Posledstviya agressii Gruzii i formirovanie gosudarstvennoy granicy mezhdu Rossiyskoy Federaciey, Gruziey, Yuzhnoy Osetiey, Abhaziey (o nekotoryh sovremennyh voennyh problemah mezhdunarodnogo prava) // Voennoe pravo. - 2013. - № 3. - S. 23-33.
26. Stepanov V. V., Strukov A. V. Problemy razresheniya konkurencii sostavov prestupleniy ekstremistskoy napravlennosti // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki. - 2015. - № 1 (27). - S. 133-140.
27. Klimenko B. M., Pork A. A. Territoriya i granica SSSR. - Moskva: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1985. - 302 c.
28. Hlebushkin A. G. Publichnye prizyvy k osuschestvleniyu deystviy, napravlennyh na narushenie territorial'noy celostnosti Rossiyskoy Federacii (st. 280.1 UK RF): ugolovno-pravovaya harakteristika i voprosy kvalifikacii // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. - 2014. - № 11. - S. 25-29.
29. Cay In. Izmeneniya v rabote amurskogo rechnogo transporta posle demarkacii rossiysko-kitayskoy granicy v 2004 godu // Chteniya pamyati Evgeniya Petrovicha Sychevskogo. - 2021. - № 21. - S. 89-95.
30. Chernyavskiy D. O., Skulakov R. M. Publichnye prizyvy k narusheniyu territorial'noy celostnosti: problemy social'no-politicheskoy obuslovlennosti ugolovno-pravovogo zapreta // Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravoohranitel'naya praktika. - 2015. - № 1 (31). - S. 73-79.
31. Scherbak S. I. Narushenie territorial'noy celostnosti Rossiyskoy Federacii posredstvom protivopravnogo izmeneniya Gosudarstvennoy granicy Rossiyskoy Federacii, kak proyavlenie ekstremizma // Voennoe pravo. - 2020. - № 5 (63). - S. 177-184.
32. Shugrina E. S. Izmenenie granic sub'ekta RF: osobennosti pravovogo regulirovaniya i pravoprimenitel'noy praktiki // Lex russica. - 2012. - № 5. - S. 938-957.
33. Boggs, S. International Boundaries [Electronic resource] / S. Boggs. - New York : Columbia University Press, 1940. - 111 p. - URL: https://www.questia.com (data obrascheniya: 12.12.2021).
34. Curzon Lord of Kedleston. Romanes Lectures: Frontiers [Electronic resource] // Curzon Lord of Kedleston. - Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1907. - 58 p. - URL: https://archive.org/details/frontiers00curz. (data obrascheniya: 12.12.2021).
35. Holdich, T. Political frontiers and boundary making [Electronic resource] / T. Holdich. - London: Macmillan and Co., Limited St. Martin’s street, 1916. - 309 p. - URL: https://archive.org/detdeta/politicalfrontie00holdiala. (data obrascheniya: 12.12.2021).
36. Jones, S. Boundary Making a handbook for statesmen, treaty editors and boundary commissioners [Electronic resource] / S. Jones. - Washington : Carnegie Foundation for International Peace, 1945. - 272 p. - URL: https://www.questia.com/read/53417527/boundary-making-a-handbook-for-statesmen-treaty. (data obrascheniya: 12.12.2021).
37. La Pradelle, P. La frontière. Étude de droit international / P. La Pradelle. - Paris : Les Editions internationales, 1928. - 368 p.
38. Rushworth, D. Mapping in Support of Frontier Arbitration: Delimitation and Demarcation [Electronic resource] / D. Rushworth // IBRU Boundary and Security Bulletin Spring. - 1997. - P. 61-67. - URL: https://www.dur.ac.uk/resources/ibru/publications/full/bsb5-1_rushworth.pdf. (data obrascheniya: 12.12.2021).
39. Kirillova E. A., Suslikov V. N., Bogdan V. V., Baybarin A. A., Sheveleva S. V. Mobile real estate: legal status and succession principles // Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics. - 2015. - T. 6. - № 1. - S. 96-103.
40. Sayel M. Al., Lohmann P., Heipke C. International boundary making - three case studies [Electronic resource] // International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. - 2009. - Mode of access : http://www.isprs.org/proceedings/XXXVIII/1_4_7-W5/paper/Al_Sayel-123.pdf. - (data obrascheniya: 12.12.2021).
41. Pahlyan Anna. Ekonomicheskiy potencial Arcaha posle «novogo opredeleniya». Vozmozhnosti, ostavshiesya za granicey [na armyanskom yazyke] // Informacionnyy byulleten' «Amberd». - 2020. - № 6 (7). - P. 13-21.
