from 01.01.2022 to 01.01.2023
Saint-Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
GRNTI 15.00 ПСИХОЛОГИЯ
OKSO 37.00.00 Психологические науки
BBK 884 Психология отдельных видов деятельности. Отраслевая (прикладная) психология
BBK 883 Общая психология
TBK 83 Психология
TBK 8342 Инженерная психология. Психология труда и профессиональной деятельности
BISAC FIC025000 Psychological
Introduction. The author explores the loyalty of law enforcement officers, and its psychological organization. The importance of the study is justified by the lack of theoretical knowledge about the content, structure, and factors of loyalty formation in law enforcement officers. It is assumed that the professional loyalty of employees is conditioned by three types of relations, which are simultaneously the bases of its expression. The psychological structure of loyalty consists of a) attitude towards professional activity, b) the senior staff, and c) the employee’s selfperception as a specialist. The article lays grounds to the importance of studying these types of attitudes for assessing the state of loyalty, prognosis and correction, the author points out the necessity of developing tools for its diagnostics. The aim of study was to operationalize the construct of professional loyalty of law enforcement officers, based on assumption of role of the immediate supervisor in its formation. Research methodology, methods, and techniques. At the preliminary stage the author user statistical research methods: descriptive statistics measures, assessment of internal consistency y α-Cronbach’s calculation. At the construct stage confirmatory factor analysis method was used. Hypothesis solving involved creating and testing a set of statements assessing loyalty. Convergent indicator of loyalty was the scale «Continued loyalty» of the method «Scale of organizational commitment» by J. Meyer and N. Allen, adapted by the author of the research. The result of the study is a psychometric confirmation of the structural validity of the questionnaire based on the loyalty construct. There were empirically revealed relations of the indicators «Professional attitude» (p ≤ 0,001), «Attitude towards superior» (p ≤ 0,001), «Attitude towards self-esteem» (p ≤ 0,001) and «Attitude towards leaving the organization» (p ≤ 0,001). The research results allow us to operationalize the concept of loyalty and develop an instrument of its assessment. Theoretical significance of the results helps us to expand the scientific ideas about the subjective foundations of law enforcement officers’ loyalty formation, and to reveal the role of the superior in the formation of employee’s loyalty as a derivative of his self-concept and attitude towards the activity.
attitude to the superior, professional attitude, self-assessment, police officers, professional loyalty, psychodiagnostics toolkit
1. Aganov, S. S., Ivanova, E. S. (2018). Faktory, vliyayushchie na professional’nuyu rabotosposobnost’ sotrudnikov GPS MCHS Rossii pri tushenii pozharov. Uchenye zapiski universiteta im. P. F. Lesgafta, 11(165), 11-15.
2. Berezin, I. G. (2014). Psihologicheskie osobennosti professional’noj identifikacii sotrudnikov sledstvennogo komiteta. Rossijskij psihologicheskij zhurnal, 11(2), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2014.2.3
3. Vasil’ev, M. V., SHurygina, YU. V. (2015). Osobennosti pravovogo regulirovaniya truda sledovatelej Sledstvennogo komiteta Rossijskoj Federacii (na primere Sledstvennogo upravleniya Sledstvennogo komiteta Rossijskoj Federacii po Respublike Tatarstan). Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sociologii, 4, 173-178.
4. Germanov, I. A., Plotnikova, E. B. (2011). Izmerenie organizacionnoj loyal’nosti personala (opyt aprobacii metodiki Mejer-Allen). Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psihologiya. Sociologiya, 3(7), 106-111.
5. Goncharova, N. A., Sarsenova, A. A., Aleshina, V. Yu. (2020). Motivacionnye prediktory sluzhebnoj loyal’nosti sub”ektov uchebno-professional’noj deyatel’nosti. Prikladnaya yuridicheskaya psihologiya, 4(53), 116-123.
6. Gordeeva, M. A. (2014). Emocional’noe vygoranie gosudarstvennyh sluzhashchih. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya, 9, 43-45.
7. Gornostaev, S. V. (2017). Teoretiko-metodologicheskie osnovaniya issledovaniya sluzhebnoj loyal’nosti sotrudnikov ugolovno-ispolnitel’noj sistemy. Chelovek: prestuplenie i nakazanie, 25(3), 483-488.
8. Gornostaev, S. V., Pozdnyakov, V. M. (2016). Problemy vzaimosvyazi sluzhebnoj loyal’nosti i lichnostnogo blagopoluchiya gosudarstvennyh sluzhashchih. Chelovek: prestuplenie i nakazanie, 3(94), 30-36.
9. Dezhkina, Yu. A. (2007). Razvitie professional’no vazhnyh kachestv sotrudnikov gosudarstvennoj protivopozharnoj sluzhby MCHS Rossii v processe professionalizacii: avtoref. … kand. psihol. nauk. Saint Petersburg.
10. Demushina, O. N. (2015). Faktory, vliyayushchie na loyal’nost’ personala kommercheskoj organizacii. Azimut nauchnyh issledovanij: pedagogika i psihologiya, 1(10), 65-70.
11. Dominyak, V. I. (2006). Organizacionnaya loyal’nost’: osnovnye podhody. Menedzher po personalu, 4, 34-40.
12. Ermolaev, V. V. (2012). Predstavleniya o professional’noj kar’ere u sotrudnikov policii s raznym urovnem loyal’nosti k organizacii. Vestnik Voronezhskogo instituta MVD Rossii, 4, 162-166.
13. Zinov’eva, D. M., Yunda, A. V., Dolgopolova, O. A. (2010). Professional’nye determinanty sub”ektivnogo blagopoluchiya gosudarstvennyh i municipal’nyh sluzhashchih. Sociologiya vlasti, 7, 132-140.
14. Zlokazov, K. V. (2011). Psihologicheskij analiz destruktivnosti lichnosti sotrudnikov pravoohranitel’nyh organov: monografiya. Ekaterinburg: Ural’skij yuridicheskij institut MVD Rossii.
15. Savos’kina, T. N., Chervonnyh, E. V., Zubkov, V. Yu. (2011). Normirovanie trudovoj deyatel’nosti v obespechivayushchih podrazdeleniyah organov i uchrezhdenij Ministerstva vnutrennih del Rossijskoj Federacii: osnovnye harakteristiki, tendencii, problemy i puti ih preodoleniya. Trudy Akademii upravleniya MVD Rossii, 1 (17), 13-18.
16. Iskhakov, E. R., Bikkinina G. M. (2010). Intensivnost’ proizvodstvennoj nagruzki i napryazhennost’ truda kak faktory riska sluzhebnoj deyatel’nosti sotrudnikov organov vnutrennih del. Medicina truda i promyshlennaya ekologiya, 6, 32-38.
17. Kidinov, A. V. (2021). Issledovanie additivnogo i subordinativnogo mekhanizmov razvitiya vnutrigruppovyh otnosh¬enij v professional’noj organizacii. Obshchestvo: sociologiya, psihologiya, pedagogika, 5(85), 106-111. https://doi. org/10.24158/spp.2021.5.17
18. Koren’, V. A., Ma C., Semunina, S. E. (2021). Analiz metodik izmereniya organizacionnoj loyal’nosti. Skif. Voprosy studencheskoj nauki, 8(60), 19-27.
19. Lopatin, E. A., Lavrent’eva, I. V., Vorob’ev, S. M. (2020). Vzaimosvyaz’ loyal’nosti kursantov k sluzhbe i ee neseniyu v vuze Ministerstva vnutrennih del Rossijskoj Federacii s urovnem sub”ektivnogo finansovogo blagopoluchiya. Prikladnaya yuridicheskaya psihologiya, 1(50), 61-67. https://doi.org/10.33463/2072-8336.2020.1(50).061-067
20. Lyachin, M. A. (2014). Loyal’nost’ v sisteme motivacii trudovoj deyatel’nosti. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika, 4(28), 32-35.
21. Osin, E. N., Ivanova, T. Yu., Gordeeva, T. O. (2013). Avtonomnaya i kontroliruemaya professional’naya motivaciya kak prediktory sub”ektivnogo blagopoluchiya u sotrudnikov rossijskih organizacij. Organizacionnaya psihologiya, 3(1), 8-29.
22. Solomin, I. L. (2001). «O cvetovyh metaforah», i ne tol’ko o nih. (Psihologicheskaya gazeta). Psihologiya obucheniya, 8.
23. Tutikova, I. A. (2015). Zhaloby uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva kak rezul’tat sledstvennyh oshibok na stadii predvaritel’nogo rassledovaniya. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya «Ekonomika i pravo», 25(4), 150-153.
24. Falkina, S. A. (2019). Professional’no vazhnye kachestva prokurorskih rabotnikov dlya deyatel’nosti v sfere profilaktiki. Mir nauki. Pedagogika i psihologiya, 7(4). URL: https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/60PSMN419.pdf
25. Becker, T. E., Billings, R. S., Eveleth, D. M., & Gilbert, N. L. (1996). Foci and Bases of Employee Commitment: implications for Job Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 464-482. https://doi.org/10.5465/256788
26. Reichheld, F. (2006). The Microeconomics of Customer Relationships. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(2), 73-78.
