Russian Federation
employee
UDK 343.132 Следственные действия. Осмотр места преступления, следственный эксперимент. Домашний обыск. Очная ставка
GRNTI 10.79 Уголовно-процессуальное право (уголовный процесс)
OKSO 40.02.02 Правоохранительная деятельность
BBK 67411 Уголовно-процессуальное право (уголовный процесс)
TBK 7582 Уголовно-процессуальное право
BISAC LAW000000 General
The article raises an urgent issue concerning the lack of regulation of the use of digital technologies in pre-trial proceedings in criminal cases. The authors put the problems of introducing digital technologies into criminal proceedings in the context of the need to guarantee the compliance with reasonable terms of criminal proceedings, to ensure the rights and legitimate interests of their participants and optimize public spending in general. The authors developed specific ways to solve the identified problems that negatively affect the material and procedural sides of the work done by investigator, interrogating officer and other participants in criminal proceedings. The authors propose to consolidate in the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation the possibility to send digital copies of procedural decisions and other documents to participants in criminal proceedings, to hand over copies of an indictment (acts, resolutions) with applications in digital form, the right of the parties to access the criminal case materials in the digital form. That new provisions would allow to sign a digital procedural document with a certified electronic signature that guarantees its authenticity and excludes the possibility of unauthorized changes. These proposals are supported by the results of the analysis of data on the application of the legislation of the Russian Federation and foreign states in the researched sphere.
criminal proceedings, pre-trial criminal proceedings, digitalization, remote technologies, electronic document image
1. Arestova E. N., Borbat A. V. Cifrovye tehnologii v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: problemy vnedreniya // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. - 2021. - № 7. - S. 16-20.
2. Voskobitova L. A. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo i cifrovye tehnologii: problemy sovmestimosti // Lex Russica. - 2019. - № 5. - S. 91-104.
3. Voronov D. A. Elektronnoe informirovanie uchastnikov processa v dosudebnom proizvodstve // Ugolovnyy process. - 2020. - № 4. - S. 88-94.
4. Grishina E. P. K voprosu ob ispol'zovanii elektronnyh dokazatel'stv v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Administrator suda. - 2020. - № 3. - S. 31-34.
5. Ivanov E. E. Uvedomlenie uchastnikov sudoproizvodstva na dosudebnyh stadiyah: usilit' garantii // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. - 2020. - T. 15. - № 4 (113). - S. 99-109. - doihttps://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.113.4.099
6. Ischenko P. P. Sovremennye podhody k cifrovizacii dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnym delam // Lex russica. - 2019. - № 12. - S. 68-79.
7. Makarova O. V. Sovershenstvovanie sudoproizvodstva putem vnedreniya elektronnoy formy ugolovnogo dela // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. - 2019. - № 2. - S. 159-168.
8. Maslennikova L. N. Transformaciya dosudebnogo proizvodstva v nachal'nyy etap ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva, obespechivayuschiy dostup k pravosudiyu v eru Industry 4.0 // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. - 2019. - № 6. - S. 137-146.
9. Pobedkin A. V. Proizvodstvo sledstvennyh deystviy s ispol'zovaniem sistem video-konferenc-svyazi na dosudebnom proizvodstve: ramochnost' processual'nyh garantiy // Vestnik Ufimskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. - 2022. - № 1. - S. 77-83.
10. Sheremet'ev I. I. Ispol'zovanie cifrovyh tehnologiy pri rassmotrenii ugolovnyh del v sude: real'nost' i perspektivy // Lex russica. - 2019. - № 5. - S. 117-131.
