graduate student from 01.01.2017 until now
UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
GRNTI 10.79 Уголовно-процессуальное право (уголовный процесс)
The framework of procedural decision is the assessment of the evidence. The problem of assessment of admissibility and reliability of the evidence in the criminal legal procedure is important because the assessment defines the credibility of the evidence. The goal of the article is to analyze relationship admissibility and reliability, to provide the author’s position about subjects of the assessment of the admissibility and reliability, to model situations involved in assessment by the criminal legal proceedings. The author stresses the importance of the assessment of the item qualities of criminal evidence. This conclusion is based on the analysis of statistics and scientific approaches. The need for relationship admissibility and reliability of the evidence in the criminal legal proceedings is stressed. The study advances the understanding of the subjects of the assessment, authorized making a decision. The author has modeled situations involved in the assessment of the criminal legal procedure and suggested a solution to the problem.
criminal procedure, assessment of the criminal evidence, admissibility of the evidence, reliability of the evidence, evidence, proving
1. Kostenko R. V. Nekotorye osobennosti ocenki otnosimosti i dostovernosti veschestvennyh dokazatel'stv po ugolovnym delam // Yuridicheskiy vestnik Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. - 2018. - № 3. - S. 52-57.
2. Kornakova S. V. Problema ocenki processual'nyh resheniy na dosudebnyh stadiyah ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva s pozicii spravedlivosti // Sibirskie ugolovno-processual'nye i kriminalisticheskie chteniya. - 2019. - № 1 (23). - S. 84-90.
3. Rossinskiy S. B. Problema ispol'zovaniya v ugolovnom processe rezul'tatov operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti trebuet okonchatel'nogo razresheniya // Lex Russica (Russkiy zakon). - 2018. - № 10 (143). - S. 70-84.
4. Zotov D. V. Standarty dokazyvaniya v stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. - Seriya «Pravo». - 2016. - № 2 (25). - S. 265-276.
5. Lucenko P. A. Ocenka sudom dokazatel'stv v stadii sudebnogo razbiratel'stva pri proizvodstve po ugolovnomu delu: empiricheskiy analiz // Vestnik instituta: prestuplenie, nakazanie, ispravlenie. - 2018. - № 3 (43). - S. 58-65.
6. Bezglasnaya O. A. Nekotorye aktual'nye problemy ocenki dokazatel'stv v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. - 2015. - № 1 (50). - S. 128-132.
7. Bryanskaya E. V. Universal'nost' vnutrennego ubezhdeniya sud'i kak metoda i itoga ocenki dokazatel'stv po ugolovnomu delu // Glagol' pravosudiya. - 2016. - № 2 (12). - S. 48-55.
8. Kapustina L. K. Sootnoshenie dopustimosti i dostovernosti dokazatel'stv v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Vestnik Kazanskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. - 2019. - № 3 (37). - S. 386-390.
9. Terehin V. V. Standarty dopustimosti dokazatel'stv v ugolovnom processe // Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii. - 2016. - № 1 (33). - S. 188-193.
