from 01.01.2023 to 01.01.2026
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
from 01.01.2000 to 01.01.2026
Russian Federation
UDC 378.18
Introduction. The strategic course towards preserving a common educational space for the Commonwealth of Independent States and other friendly countries poses the challenge of effective educational work with foreign students in law enforcement higher education institutions. In this regard, the problem of organising educational work with foreign students in institutions of the Russian Ministry of the Interior becomes particularly relevant. The analysis of the educational programme at University of the MIA of Russia revealed a discrepancy between the declared humanistic principles and the limited use of interactive teaching methods. The aim of the reasearch is to develop a design matrix for an educational event that implements the principles of the humanistic-anthropological approach. Methods. The research employs the analysis and synthesis of scientific and methodological literature, pedagogical modeling, participant observation, and reflexive analysis. Results. The research integrates andragogy and the event-based approach through the principles of dialogue of cultures. This synthesis is implemented through a new teacher position – that of an equal partner and “co-worker” within a co-existential student community. A design matrix for the three-day festival “We are Different, but We are Together” was developed. The pilot study involved 79 students from 21 countries. The participants overcame formal distance and developed a new group identity: their symbolic countries were named “Druzhbostan” (Friendship-stan), and their capitals “Sem’ya” (Family). They also internalised the values of co-existence through the “Friendship Passport”. Conclusions. The transition from technocratic logic to the design of pedagogical events is possible based on a synthesis of andragogy, the co-existential approach, dialogue of cultures, and non-formal education. Crucial to the implementation of the approach is the teacher’s position as a “co-worker”, capable of creating and sustaining a space for genuine encounter and reflection.
higher education institution of the Ministry of the Interior of Russia, foreign students, humanistic-anthropological approach, andragogical approach, non-formal education, design matrix
1. Dzhurinskiy A. N. Internacionalizaciya vysshego obrazovaniya: sotrudnichestvo Rossii i Kitaya // Gumanitarnye nauki i obrazovanie. 2020. T. 11, № 1 (41). S. 34–40. https://doi.org/10.51609/2079-3499_2020_11_1_34
2. Novikov S. V. Internacionalizaciya sfery vysshego obrazovaniya RF v usloviyah sovremennyh vyzovov // Estestvenno-gumanitarnye issledovaniya. 2023. № 4 (48). S. 531–536.
3. Ilakavichus M. R. Gumanitarno-antropologicheskiy podhod kak osnova organizacii professional'nogo vospitaniya predstaviteley professiy sluzheniya // Nauchno-pedagogicheskoe obozrenie. 2023. № 3 (49). S. 89–96. https://doi.org/10.23951/2307-6127-2023-3-86-93
4. Belyankina V. A., Bantyukov I. B. Sociokul'turnye i psihologicheskie osobennosti adaptacii inostrannyh slushateley v obrazovatel'nyh organizaciyah MVD Rossii // Rossiyskiy deviantologicheskiy zhurnal. 2024. T. 4, № 4. S. 557–575. https://doi.org/10.35750/2713-0622-2024-4-557-575
5. Sen'ko Yu. V. Gumanitarnaya paradigma obrazovaniya / Obrazovanie cherez vsyu zhizn': nepreryvnoe obrazovanie v interesah ustoychivogo razvitiya : sbornik statey 2-oy mezhdunarodnoy konferencii, g. Sankt-Peterburg, 30 maya – 1 iyunya 2014 g. Sankt-Peterburg : Leningradskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet imeni A.S. Pushkina, 2014. Vyp. 12, ch. 1. S. 50–53.
6. Dauber D. What is integration and why is it important for internationalisation? A multidisciplinary review // Journal of Studies in International Education. 2019. Vol. 23, № 5. P. 515–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315319842346
7. Valickaya A. P., Rabosh V. A. Inklyuzivnoe obrazovanie: chemu i kak uchit' // Vestnik Gercenovskogo universiteta. 2008. № 11 (61). S. 14–16.
8. Valickaya A. P. Novaya shkola Rossii: kul'turotvorcheskaya model' v kontekste zadach duhovno-nravstvennogo vospitaniya // Vestnik Gercenovskogo universiteta. 2010. № 2 (76). S. 20–28.
9. Sen'ko Yu. V. Obrazovanie kak gumanitarnaya model' zhiznedeyatel'nosti / Dialog kul'tur i partnerstvo civilizaciy : VIII Mezhdunarodnye Lihachevskie nauchnye chteniya : sbornik konferencii, g. Sankt-Peterburg, 22–23 maya 2008 g. Sankt-Peterburg : Sankt-Peterburgskiy gumanitarnyy universitet profsoyuzov, 2008. S. 455–456.
10. Valickaya A. P. Nacional'noe samosoznanie i problema sozdaniya suverennoy sistemy obrazovaniya // Obschestvo. Sreda. Razvitie. 2017. № 4 (45). S. 30–37.
11. Sen'ko Yu. V. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie kak gumanitarnyy fenomen // Izvestiya Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 1999. № 4 (14). S. 65–73
12. Vershlovskiy S. G. Obrazovanie vzroslyh: teoreticheskie i metodicheskie problemy // Obrazovanie cherez vsyu zhizn': nepreryvnoe obrazovanie v interesah ustoychivogo razvitiya. 2012. № 1 (1). S. 23–30.
13. Grigor'ev D. V. Sobytie vospitaniya i vospitanie kak sobytie // Voprosy vospitaniya. 2007. № 1. S. 90–99.
14. Gukalenko O. V., Borisenkov V. P. Polikul'turnoe obrazovanie i vyzovy sovremennosti // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 20: Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie. 2018. № 2. S. 3–11. https://doi.org/10.51314/2073-2635-2018-2-3-11
15. Ilakavichus M. R. Sobytiynost' kak uslovie mezhkul'turnogo dialoga sub'ektov prostranstva obrazovaniya vzroslyh Sodruzhestva nezavisimyh gosudarstv // Mir nauki : [setevoe izdanie]. 2017. T. 5, № 2. S. 19.
16. Ilakavichus M. R. Praktiki neformal'nogo obrazovaniya v sisteme moral'no-psihologicheskogo obespecheniya deyatel'nosti organov vnutrennih del Rossiyskoy Federacii // Pedagogika. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2025. T. 10, № 6. S. 849–855. https://doi.org/10.30853/ped20250101
17. Asmolov A. G. Interv'yu A. G. Asmolova I. M. Logvinovoy : Uchitel' – master porozhdeniya smyslov v shkole neopredelennosti // Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya pedagogika. 2016. № 4 (31). S. 8–13.
18. Slobodchikov V. I. So-bytiynaya obrazovatel'naya obschnost' – istochnik razvitiya i sub'ekt obrazovaniya // Novye cennosti obrazovaniya. 2010. T. 43, № 1. S. 4–13.
19. Frolovskaya M. N. Germenevtika professional'nogo obraza mira pedagoga : monografiya / pod nauch. red.Yu. V. Sen'ko. Barnaul : AltGPU, 2022. 288 s.
20. Borytko N. M. V prostranstve vospitatel'noy deyatel'nosti : monografiya. Volgograd : Peremena, 2001. 181 s.
21. Evtyugina A. A. Sociokul'turnaya znachimost' festivalya v mezhkul'turnoy kommunikacii i socializacii inostrannyh studentov v vuze // Cross-Cultural Studies: Education and Science. 2018. T. 3, № 3. S. 453–458.
22. Bederhanova V. P., Demakova I. D., Krylova N. B. Gumanisticheskie smysly obrazovaniya // Problemy sovremennogo obrazovaniya. 2012. № 1. S. 16–27.
