from 01.01.2020 until now
Russian Federation
UDC 343.01
UDC 342.9
CSCSTI 10.17
CSCSTI 10.77
Introduction. Criminal and administrative law are the most closely related branches of legal regulation of social relations. It is largely for this reason that the criteria for distinguishing between the means for counteracting crime they provide are rather conditional. Meanwhile, such conditionality is not so much doctrinal as practical in nature, which is reflected in both legislative and law enforcement activities. This approach fully applies to the legal specification of particular coercive measures, the classification of which into one or another sphere of legal regulation has historically never been developed. Methods. The methodological basis of the research involves general scientific dialectical and formal-logical methods. Results. The categories used in criminal law theory, such as repression, punishment or retribution, as well as other evaluative criteria such as brutality or severity of its implementation, contribute little to understanding what should be classified as criminal or administrative sphere of legal regulation. At the same time, the European system of legal relations demonstrates a fundamentally different, significantly more flexible and realistic approach to solving this issue. These facts make it possible to conclude that the current paradigm for developing measures for counteracting crime within the specified branches of law needs a thorough review.
responsibility, coercion, recovery, counteraction, impact, regulation
1. Bavsun M. V. Vydvorenie, deportaciya i rezhim vysylki, kak inye mery ugolovno-pravovogo haraktera // Nauchnyy vestnik Omskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2025. T. 31, № 2 (97). S. 159–164. https://doi.org/10.24412/1999-625X-2025-297-159-164
2. Reriht A. A., Dubovik O. L. Razgranichenie ugolovnoy i administrativnoy otvetstvennosti: teoreticheskie osnovaniya i prakticheskie posledstviya // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. 2017. № 5. S. 107–123. https://doi.org/10.25136/2409- 7136.2017.5.22748
3. Golovko L. V. Razgranichenie administrativnoy i ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti po rossiyskomu pravu // Lex Russika. 2016. № 1 (25). S. 139–145.
4. Babaev M. M., Pudovochkin Yu. E. Koncentraciya ugolovnoy repressii: problemy teoreticheskogo ponimaniya i praktiki voploscheniya // Nauchnyy portal MVD Rossii. 2011. № 1. S. 22–31.
5. Aleksandrova I. A. Sovremennaya ugolovnaya politika obespecheniya ekonomicheskoĭ bezopasnosti : monografiya. Nizhniy Novgorod : Nizhegorodskaya akademiya MVD Rossii, 2014. 206 s.
6. Rarog A. I. Ugolovnaya politika i ugolovno-pravovye ambicii // Vserossiyskiy kriminologicheskiy zhurnal. 2016. T. 10, № 3. S. 470-479. https://doi.org/10.17150/2500-4255.2016.10(3).470-479
7. Denisova A. V. Rossiĭskoe ugolovnoe pravo kak otkrytaya social'naya podsistema / Ugolovnoe pravo v epohu finansovo-ekonomicheskih peremen : materialy IX Rossiyskogo Kongressa ugolovnogo prava, g. Moskva, 29–30 maya 2014 g. / otv. red. V. S. Komissarov. Moskva : Yurlitform, 2014. S. 18–22.
8. Lesnikov G. Yu. Ugolovnaya politika kak strategiya i taktika bor'by s prestupnost'yu / Sovremennye problemy ugolovnoĭ politiki : materialy IV mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, g. Krasnodar, 27 sentyabrya 2013 g. : v 3 t. / pod red. A. N. Il'yashenko. Krasnodar : Krasnodarskiy universitet MVD Rossii, 2013. T. 1. S. 127–133.
9. Bulatov B. B. Gosudarstvennoe prinuzhdenie v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve : monografiya. Omsk : Omskaya akademiya MVD Rossii, 2003. 320 s.
10. Golovko L. V. Sootnoshenie ugolovnyh prestupleniy i administrativnyh pravonarusheniy v kontekste koncepcii Criminal Matter (ugolovnoy sfery) // Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie. 2013. № 1. S. 42–52.
11. Nechepurenko A. A. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost': evolyuciya ponyatiya i perspektivy zakonodatel'nogo regulirovaniya : monografiya. Omsk : Omskaya akademiya MVD Rossii, 2014. 175 s.
12. Bagriy-Shahmatov L. V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' i nakazanie. Minsk : Vysheyshaya shkola, 1976. 383 s.
13. Zhalinskiy A. E. Ugolovnaya politologiya. Sravnitel'noe mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo // Izbrannye trudy : [v 4 t.] / sost. K. A. Barysheva [i dr.]. Moskva : Izdatel'skiy dom Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, 2015. T. 3. 618 s.
14. Kaplunov A. I. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' kak forma administrativnogo prinuzhdeniya // Sibirskoe yuridicheskoe obozrenie. 2019. № 4. S. 518–524. https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2019-16-4-518-524
15. Solovey Yu. P. Rossiyskoe zakonodatel'stvo ob administrativnoy otvetstvennosti nuzhdaetsya v sovershenstvovanii // Vestnik universiteta imeni O. E. Kutafina. 2014. № 2. S. 56–63.
16. Ponyatovskaya T. G. Preduprezhdenie prestupleniy: mery bezopasnosti, administrativnyy nadzor // Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal Baykal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava. 2013. № 3. S. 98–103.
17. Genrih N. V. Predmet i metod ugolovno-pravovogo regulirovaniya: istoriya, teoriya, praktika. Moskva : Norma, 2011. 318 s.
18. Kul'char K. Osnovy sociologii prava : [perevod] / s predisl. i pod obsch. red. V. P. Kazimirchuka. Moskva : Progress, 1981. 256 s.
19. Marcev A. I. Dialektika i voprosy teorii ugolovnogo prava. Krasnoyarsk : Izdatel'stvo Krasnoyarskogo universiteta, 1990.125 s.
20. Leĭkina N. S. Lichnost' prestupnika i ugolovnaya otvetstvennost'. Leningrad : Izdatel'stvo Leningradskogo universiteta, 1968. 128 s.
21. Karpushin M. P., Kurlyandskiĭ V. I. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' i sostav prestupleniya. Moskva : Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1974. 231 s.
