graduate student from 01.01.2024 until now
Irkutsk region, Russian Federation
Introduction. The purpose of this study is to substantiate and identify priority areas for improving the quality of legal technology in the context of the impact of globalization processes. The article examines the current challenges of the legal system related to the peculiarities of the harmonization of national and international legislation, digitalization, the use of legal monitoring and the level of qualification of specialists in the field of law-making. The source base of the work consists of regulatory legal acts, official international documents, scientific literature and materials of law enforcement practice. Methods. The methodological basis of the research consists of general scientific and special legal methods (analysis, synthesis, formal legal, comparative legal), providing a holistic study of the object and the identification of factors affecting the quality of legal technology. Results. As a result of the research, key aspects influencing legal technology have been identified: the need to maintain a balance between national legislation and international norms; the growing importance of the unification of legal terminology; the impact of digitalization on the processes of rulemaking; the lack of professional training of specialists in the field of legal technology. In addition, the author formulates four priority areas for improving legal technology, substantiates the need for a systematic approach to improving the quality of legal technology based on the integration of theoretical developments, analysis of legal practice and the use of digital innovations. It is concluded that in the context of globalization, legal technology is no longer just a technical tool, it is becoming a strategic element of legal policy and state-legal stability.
legistics, globalisation, law-making, harmonisation of legislation, digitalisation, monitoring of law enforcement, legal terminology
1. Larina T. V. Vliyanie globalizacii na formirovanie istochnikov chastnogo prava // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2024. № 3. S. 113–122. https://doi.org/10.24412/2073-0454-2024-3-113-122
2. Piskunova O. V. Problemnye aspekty effektivnosti funkcionirovaniya norm prava // Vestnik Saratovskoy gosudarstvennoy yuridicheskoy akademii. 2022. № 2 (145). S. 53–59. https://doi.org/10.24412/2227-7315-2022-2-53-59
3. Kovalev M. I. Rol' pravosoznaniya i yuridicheskoy tehniki v razvitii ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1985. № 8. S. 73–79.
4. Davydova M. L. Yuridicheskaya tehnika: problemy teorii i metodologii : monografiya. Volgograd : Izdatel'stvo Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2009. 317 s.
5. Lukashuk I. I. Globalizaciya, gosudarstvo, pravo, XXI vek : monografiya. Moskva : Spark, 2000. 261 s.
6. Havanova I. A. Mnogoyazychnye nalogovye dogovory i osobennosti ih tolkovaniya // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. 2016. № 2 (57). S. 59–64. https://doi.org/10.12737/19203
7. Gorbunova S. S. Pravovye problemy organizacii i planirovaniya deyatel'nosti po provedeniyu monitoringa pravoprimeneniya v Rossiyskoy Federacii // Pravovaya informatika. 2012. № 1. S. 26–30.
8. Zayceva E. S. Social'no-pravovoy monitoring i ego znachenie dlya ustanovleniya predelov pravovogo regulirovaniya // Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki. 2024. T. 28, № 2.S. 263–279. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2337-2024-28-2-263-279
9. Dorskaya A. A., Dorskiy A. Yu. Osnovnye napravleniya povysheniya effektivnosti pravoprimeneniya v usloviyah cifrovizacii // Vestnik MGPU. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki. 2024. № 1 (53). S. 14–26. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9113.2024.53.1.02
10. Blagoveschenskiy N. Yu. Razvitie federal'nyh registrov i federal'nyh reestrov // Pravovaya informatika. 2020. № 2. S. 82–91. https://doi.org/10.21681/1994-1404-2020-2-82-91
11. Hizhnyak V. S. Globalizaciya kak faktor razvitiya mezhdunarodno-pravovoy politiki Rossiyskoy Federacii // Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn'. 2020. № 2. S. 8–15.
12. Magomedova E. A., Krivushin A. V. Yuridicheskaya tehnika kak faktor effektivnosti pravovogo regulirovaniya // Vestnik Kaluzhskogo universiteta. 2019. № 1. S. 24–26.
13. Rumyancev M. B. Osobennosti metodiki pravotvorchestva // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve. 2015. № 6. S. 29–33.
14. Baranov V. M. Normorayter kak professiya // Vestnik Saratovskoy gosudarstvennoy yuridicheskoy akademii. 2017. № 6 (119). S. 16–29.
15. Uvarov A. A. O principah monitoringa pravoprimeneniya // Monitoring pravoprimeneniya. 2022. № 1 (42). S. 56–60. https://doi.org/10.21681/2226-0692-2022-1-56-60
16. Avdeeva O. A., Avdeev V. A. Pravovaya politika Rossiyskoy Federacii v sfere protivodeystviya prestupnosti : monografiya. Irkutsk : Vostochno-Sibirskiy institut MVD Rossii, 2023. 128 c.
