Omsk, Omsk, Russian Federation
343.1
10.79
67411
7582
Introduction. Non-standard conditions reflected in the legal regimes of martial law, state of emergency, emergency situation and counter-terrorist operation have a serious impact on criminal proceedings. The implementation of criminal procedural activities under their introduction according to the previous rules may not only not contribute to the achievement of tasks, but also additionally complicate the situation. In this regard, it seems important to adapt criminal proceedings to activities in other realities. For this purpose, it is necessary at the theoretical and applied levels to admit that criminal proceedings in standard conditions and in conditions of other legal regimes should be different. This entails raising the question of adding to the conceptual apparatus the terms characterising the activities of the bodies carrying out criminal proceedings under everyday conditions and under special conditions as a basis for the formation of a new direction for the development of criminal procedural legislation under special conditions. Methods. The methods of analysis, synthesis and comparative jurisprudence were used in the research process. The results of the research consist in the formulation of new criminal procedural terms: ‘regime of everyday activity’, ‘special legal regime’, ‘special legal regime’ in order to introduce them into doctrinal criminal procedural regulation.
criminal proceedings in special conditions, legal regime, special conditions, conditions of daily activities
1. Starostin S. A. Klassifikaciya administrativno-pravovyh rezhimov // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2020. № 11. S. 3–10.
2. Samoschenko I. S. Ohrana rezhima zakonnosti Sovetskim gosudarstvom : (Pravoohranitel'naya deyatel'nost' Sovetskogo gosudarstva – metod obespecheniya socialisticheskoy zakonnosti). Moskva : Gosyurizdat, 1960. 200 s.
3. Kerimov D. A. Obespechenie zakonnosti v SSSR. Moskva : Gosyurizdat, 1956. 167 s.
4. Natashev A. E., Struchkov N. A. Osnovy teorii ispravitel'no-trudovogo prava : [nauchnaya monografiya]. Moskva : Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1967. 191 s.
5. Rushaylo V. B. Administrativno-pravovye rezhimy : monografiya. Moskva : Schit-M, 2000. 263 s.
6. Starostin S. A. Chrezvychaynye administrativno-pravovye rezhimy : monografiya. Moskva : Prospekt, 2022. 112 s.
7. Stepanov A. V. Ponyatie, priznaki, struktura i vidy administrativno-pravovyh rezhimov migracionnoy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federacii // Administrativnoe pravo i process. 2022. № 3. S. 48–54; https://doi.org/10.18572/2071-1166-2022-3-48-54.
8. Subanova N. V. Razreshitel'nye polnomochiya organov ispolnitel'noy vlasti v Rossiyskoy Federacii. Moskva : Yurisprudenciya, 2012. 288 s.
9. Chechenova L. Z. Princip zakonnosti pri realizacii special'nyh administrativno-pravovyh rezhimov, obespechivayuschih bezopasnost' v penitenciarnoy sisteme Rossii // Administrativnoe pravo i process. 2022. № 4. S. 70–73; https://doi.org/10.18572/2071-1166-2022-4-70-73.
10. Chornyy V. N., Senatova E. V. Administrativno-pravovye rezhimy v ugolovno-ispolnitel'noy sisteme // Administrativnoe pravo i process. 2021. № 4. S. 47 – 50; https://doi.org/10.18572/2071-1166-2021-4-47-50.
11. Zyryanov S. M. Ekstraordinarnye (special'nye) administrativno-pravovye rezhimy: ponyatie i obosnovanie neobhodimosti vvedeniya // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2016. № 4. S. 72–81.
12. Popova N. F. Polnomochiya milicii obschestvennoy bezopasnosti po obespecheniyu special'nyh administrativno-pravovyh rezhimov // Administrativnoe pravo i process. 2009. № 3. S. 24–25.
13. Perevalov D. V. Special'nyy kompleksnyy administrativno-pravovoy rezhim obespecheniya bezopasnosti kriticheski vazhnyh ob'ektov v Respublike Belarus' // Administrativnoe pravo i process. 2012. № 8. S. 43–50.
14. Grishin D. A. O merah gosudarstvennogo prinuzhdeniya, obespechivayuschih publichnuyu bezopasnost' ugolovno-ispolnitel'noy sistemy // Administrativnoe pravo i process. 2020. № 11. S. 57–61; https://doi.org/10.18572/2071-1166-2020-11-57-61.
15. Morozova N. A. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' kak element osobogo pravovogo rezhima // Administrativnoe pravo i process. 2017. № 10. S. 28–31.
16. Haritonov S. I. Garantii konstitucionnyh prav i svobod grazhdan v usloviyah osobyh pravovyh rezhimov // Yurist. 2020. № 12. S. 53–58; https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3929-2020-12-53-58.
