Self-fulfilment of a criminogenic individual: the importance of social environment
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
Introduction. The relevance of the study of criminogenic individuals’ self-fulfilment is determined by the necessity to prevent recidivism. The paper considers the importance of self-fulfilment as an alternative criminological technique to examine the causes of crime, failures of resocialisation and reintegration into society after serving a criminal sentence. The research shows that self-fulfilment of criminogenic individuals is not studied enough along with other aspects of personality subjectivity. Thus, there is no holistic view of its specificity among individuals demonstrating sequential-criminogenic, situational-criminogenic and law-abiding behaviour, the role that social environment plays in overcoming difficulties. The aim is to describe the self-fulfillment of an individual depending on the level of criminality, as well as attitudes to the social environment that influence its realization. Research methods are divided into methods of processing theoretical information (analysis, synthesis, classification, generalisation), as well as empirical methods of survey and processing the results of empirical research (comparison of groups by Mann-Whitney U-criterion, calculation of the generalized linear model (general linear model, GLM). The empirical study is devoted to the study of self-fulfilment of individuals depending on the type of criminogenic behaviour and attitudes to the social environment. The sample of the study consists of 388 people covering 142 law-abiding individuals, 133 situational-criminogenic people and 113 sequential-criminogenic individuals. Results. The result of the study is an empirical description of the peculiarities of self-fulfilment, typical for individuals exhibiting sequential-criminogenic type of behaviour, and importance of the social environment. The study revealed that criminogenesis negatively affects the self-fulfilment of a criminogenic individual, making it difficult to choose a personal significant goal, its retention and achievement. The availability of relations with the social environment proves to be the essential factor to maintain the focus and dealing with difficulties in self-fulfilment of a criminogenic individual. Self-fulfilment of a criminogenic individual depends on the self-attitude as a subject of interaction with others and participation of other people in personally significant goal attainment. The results can be applied in theoretical studies of criminogenic individuals, designing programs aimed at prevention of recidivism.

Keywords:
criminogenic individual, personality of recidivist, criminal behaviour, self-fulfilment of criminogenic individual, social environment of criminal
Text
Publication text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Abul'hanova-Slavskaya, K. A. (1991). Strategiya zhizni. Moskow: Mysl'.

2. Busygin, N. I., Verbina, G. G. (2017). Social'no-psihologicheskie aspekty adaptacii osuzhdyonnyh posle osvobozhdeniya iz mest lisheniya svobody. Sovremennye tendencii razvitiya nauki i tekhnologij, 2-10, 35–38.

3. Vilkova, A. V., Litvishkov, V. M. (2018). Nesovershennoletnie osuzhdennye: vospitanie ustojchivosti lichnosti. Obrazovanie i nauka v Rossii i za rubezhom, 7 (42), 28–32.

4. Volotkevich, O. V., Romanov, A. A. (2020). K voprosu o neobhodimosti razvitiya anticipacionnyh sposobnostej u nesovershennoletnih osuzhdennyh bez lisheniya svobody. Prikladnaya yuridicheskaya psihologiya, 4 (53), 40–44.

5. Denisov, A. D. (2019). Social'no-demograficheskaya i ugolovno-pravovaya harakteristika osuzhdennyh, sovershivshih prestuplenie pri recidive. Ugolovno-ispolnitel'noe pravo, 14 (1–4), 3, 269–273.

6. ermanova, I. B. (2004). K voprosu o samoaktualizacii i samorealizacii v yunosheskom vozraste. V L. A. Korostylev (red.), Psihologicheskie problemy samorealizacii lichnosti (vyp. 8, str. 89– 101). Saint Petersburg: Izdatel'stvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta.

7. Zabelina, A. V. (2013). Problema samoaktualizacii lichnosti. Gumanitarnye vedomosti TGPU im. L. N. Tolstogo, 3 (7), 26–32.

8. Zautorova E. V., Sobolev N. G. (2022). Osobennosti osmyslennosti zhizni u osuzhdennyh s dlitel'nymi srokami otbyvaniya nakazaniya. Penitenciarnaya nauka, 16 (3 (59)), 320–326.

9. Zlokazov, K. V. (2024). Adaptaciya lic, nahodyashchihsya pod administrativnym nadzorom: social'no-psihologicheskaya koncepciya, metody i sredstva: monografiya. Saint Petersburg: Sankt-Peterburgskij universitet MVD Rossii.

10. Ippolitova, E. A., Vologdina, P. E. (2019). Sub"ektivnaya kartina zhiznennogo puti zhenshchin, osuzhdennyh k lisheniyu svobody. Azimut nauchnyh issledovanij: pedagogika i psihologiya, 8 (4 (29)), 299–302.

11. Kohman, D. V., Dobrov, D. A. (2021). Nekotorye osobennosti trudoustrojstva osuzhdyonnyh k nakazaniyu v vide ispravitel'nyh rabot: opyt Rossii i stran SNG. Vestnik Voronezhskogo instituta FSIN Rossii, 1, 172–179.

12. Krotova, D. N., Cvetkova, N. A. (2023). Samoaktualizaciya osuzhdennogo kak odin iz psihologicheskih kriteriev ego ispravleniya. Chelovek: prestuplenie i nakazanie, 4, 592–609. https://doi.org/10.33463/2687-1238.2023.31(1-4).4.592-609

13. Kudinov, S. I. (2007). Polisistemnyj podhod issledovaniya samorealizacii lichnosti. Sibirskij pedagogicheskij zhurnal, 11, 335–344.

14. Kundozerova, L. I., Chirikov, A. G., Babushkin, M. M. (2019). Formirovanie professional'nogo samoopredeleniya osuzhdennyh podrostkov v vospitatel'nyh koloniyah. Vestnik Samarskogo yuridicheskogo instituta, 1 (32), 120–126.

15. Napris, A. V. (1997). Psihologicheskaya harakteristika lichnostnyh zhiznennyh planov i ih vliyanie na povedenie osuzhdennyh molodezhnogo vozrasta: na materialah ispravitel'nyh kolonij strogogo rezhima: dis. ... kand. psihol. nauk. Ryazan'.

16. Ovcharenko, N. V. (2015). Sravnitel'nyj analiz ponyatij "samorealizaciya" i "samoaktualizaciya" kak sostavlyayushchih kategorial'nogo apparata filosofii obrazovaniya. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 3-3 (53), 141–144.

17. Ovcharova, E. V. (2021). Algoritm raboty psihologa po opredeleniyu stepeni ispravleniya osuzhdennogo. Prikladnaya yuridicheskaya psihologiya, 4 (57), 46–52.

18. Ol'hovik, N. V., Prozumentov. L. M. (2009). Recidivnaya prestupnost' osuzhdyonnyh i eyo preduprezhdenie. Tomsk: Izdatel'stvo Tomskogo universiteta.

19. Konopleva, I. N., Knyazeva, S. O., Debol'skij, M. G., Krasnenkova, S. A. (2022). Osobennosti samoregulyacii u osuzhdennyh, sovershivshih prestupleniya pri recidive. Psihologiya i pravo, 12 (2), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2022120203

20. Pivovarova, T. V. (2014). Duhovno-nravstvennoe vospitanie kak cennostnaya obuslovlennost' samorealizacii lichnosti nesovershennoletnih osuzhdennyh. V N. A. Koval' (otv. red.), Psihologicheskie problemy samorealizacii sovremennoj molodezhi: materialy VI Mezhdunarodnogo seminara molodyh uchenyh i aspirantov (Tambov, 23 aprelya 2014 goda, str. 58–62). Tambov: TROO "Biznes-Nauka-Obshchestvo".

21. Pisarev, O. M. (2018). Izuchenie zhiznestojkosti lichnosti na etape postpenitenciarnoj reabilitacii kak social'no-psihologicheskaya problema. Prikladnaya yuridicheskaya psihologiya, 1 (42), 60–66.

22. Raspopin, E. V. (2020). Izuchenie prichin, prepyatstvuyushchih uspeshnoj resocializacii lic, osvobodivshihsya iz mest lisheniya svobody. Sovremennaya nauka: aktual'nye problemy teorii i praktiki. Seriya: Poznanie, 7, 90–94.

23. Rusakov, S. V. (2023). Sravnitel'nyj analiz zhiznennyh planov osuzhdennyh razlichnyh rezhimov v mestah lisheniya svobody. Viktimologiya, 10 (4), 525–537. https://doi.org/10.47475/2411-0590-2023-10-4-525-537

24. Serdyukova, E. F. (2016). Resocializaciya osuzhdyonnyh posredstvom psihologicheskogo soprovozhdeniya. Mir nauki, kul'tury, obrazovaniya, 5 (60), 258–261.

25. Filippova, O. V., Smirnov, A. V., Chernysheva, E. V. (2022). Kriminologicheskaya harakteristika lichnosti recidivista v Rossii: osnovnye tendencii izmeneniya parametrov v sovremennyj period. Vserossijskij kriminologicheskij zhurnal, 16 (2), 207–216.

26. Hotinec, V. Yu., Vyatkin, B. A., Kalinenko, A. A. (2012). Cennostno-motivacionnye faktory zhiznennyh prednaznachenij osuzhdennyh penitenciarnyh uchrezhdenij. Psihopedagogika v pravoohrani¬tel'nyh organah, 2 (49), 7–11.

27. Cvetkova, O. A., Volkova, O. V. (2022). Osobennosti samorealizacii lic, osuzhdyonnyh za tyazhkie prestupleniya. Zhivaya psihologiya, 9 (5 (37)), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.58551/24136522_202 2_9_5_11

28. Shamionov, R. M. (2012). Socializaciya i resocializaciya lichnosti: normativnost' i processual'nost'. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Akmeologiya obrazovaniya. Psihologiya razvitiya, 1 (4), 3–8.

29. El'hanova, I. M., Belenkova, L. Yu. (2023). Adaptacionnye tekhnologii kak sredstvo formirovaniya psihologicheskoj samorealizacii nesovershennoletnih osuzhdennyh. V A. I. Vostrecov (red.), Nauka i obrazovanie v sovremennom mire: voprosy teorii i praktiki: materialy Mezhdunarodnoj (zaochnoj) nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii (Neftekamsk, 31 yanvarya 2023 goda, str. 307–314). Neftekamsk: Nauchno-izdatel'skij centr «Mir nauki».


Login or Create
* Forgot password?