from 01.01.1999 until now
Kursk, Kursk, Russian Federation
UDK 342 Государственное право. Конституционное право. Административное право
Introduction. Constitutional law uses such institutions of direct democracy as referendum and plebiscite for the public law-making and resolution of issues of public importance. The institutions of direct and representative democracy cannot be opposed, but are designed to mutually complement each other. Methods. The methodological basis of the study was a set of methods of scientific cognition: comparative-legal, historical-legal, complex analysis, comparison and generalisation. Results. The author proposes to introduce the term “consultative people’s vote” into scientific turnover and legislative practice, which can be used as an alternative to a referendum. Referendum, plebiscite and consultative people’s vote can be used to express people’s trust or distrust in the authorities, since the problem of trust (or the emergence of doubt in trust) is one of the key issues in their organisation. Especially in the conditions of insufficient interparty competition, their importance as a form of expressing citizens’ trust in the political course and personalities of political leaders increases commensurately. Taking into account different points of view, the author gives in the article his own definition of these terms and defines the criteria that enable to distinguish these very close concepts, as well as subjects to theoretical analysis the possibility of restrictions on the permissible issues to be submitted for referendum (in terms of state personnel policy).
referendum, plebiscite, consultative national vote, elections, public power, people’s representation, political system
1. Kolomyttseva O. N. Vybory i referendum v mekhanizme obshchestvennogo kontrolya nad gosudarstvom // Vestnik Vladimirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta. – 2008. – № 2 (7). – S. 158–161.
2. Gryaznova T. Ye. Institut referenduma v rossiyskoy liberal’noy pravovoy mysli kontsa XIX – nachala XX vekov / Pravo i politika: istoriya i sovremennost’ : materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, 20 noyabrya 2015 g. – Omsk: Omskaya akademiya Ministerstva vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2016. – S. 30–34.
3. Mamichev V. N. Osobennosti razvitiya instituta referenduma v Rossii na sovremennom etape / Aktual’nyye problemy sovremennoy nauki : sbornik trudov Vserossiyskoy nauchnoprakticheskoy konferentsii, Kislovodsk, 02–06 maya 2012 g. – Stavropol’: Stavropol’skiy universitet, 2012. – S. 169–172.
4. Rudenko V. N. Konstitutsionnyye modeli referenduma v stranakh Yevropeyskogo soyuza, Shveytsarii i Rossii // Konstitutsionnoye pravo: vostochnoyevropeyskoye obozreniye. – 2003. – № 1 (42). – S. 10–20.
5. Luchin V. O., Grudinin N. S. Referendum i vybory v sisteme narodo-vlastiya // Zakon i pravo. – 2009. – № 3. – S. 3–7.
6. Bartole S. Chlenstvo v Yevropeyskom Soyuze, peresmotr konstitutsiy i referendumy // Sravnitel’noye konstitutsionnoye obozreniye. – 2004. – № 3 (48). – S. 156–159.
7. Shakhanov V. V., Bachernikhina M. V. Referendum kak metafenomen v sfere vzaimodeystviya publichnoy vlasti i obshchestva // Vestnik Vladimirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta. – 2021. – № 4 (61). – S. 118–121.
8. Galushko D. V. Institut referenduma v kontekste chlenstva gosudarstv v Yevropeyskom Soyuze // Gumanitarnyye i yuridicheskiye issledovaniya. – 2019. – № 4. – S. 168–174.
9. Astafichev P. A. Konstitutsionnyye popravki ob ogranichenii i is-chislenii srokov polnomochiy Prezidenta RF ot 2020 goda: soderzhaniye i pravovyye posledstviya // Zhurnal konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya. – 2020. – № 6. – S. 20–25.
10. Kozhakhmetova A. Ye. Referendum kak sredstvo zakonotvorchestva i konstitutsionnogo kontrolya // Vestnik Kazakhskogo gumanitarno-yuridicheskogo innovatsionnogo universiteta. – 2021. – № 1 (49). – S. 31–42; https://doi.org/10.48501/vestnikkazgjiu.2021.77.12.004.
11. Petukhova N. V. Sootnosheniye referenduma i plebistsita (konstitu-tsionno-pravovyye voprosy) / Pravovyye problemy ukrepleniya rossiyskoy gosudarstvennosti : sbornik statey / pod redaktsiyey M. M. Zhuravlova, A. M. Barnashova, V. M. Zuyeva. – Tomsk: Natsional’nyy issledovatel’skiy Tomskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 2010. – S. 77–79.
12. Sintsov G. V. Problemy razgranicheniya ponyatiy instituta referenduma i plebistsita v zakonodatel’stve zarubezhnykh stran // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel’stve. – 2010. – № 4. – S. 81–84.
13. Vinogradova Ye. V. Referendum ili obshcherossiyskoye golosovaniye: k voprosu o forme odobreniya popravok 2020 goda v Konstitutsiyu Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Yevraziyskaya advokatura. – 2020. – № 4 (47). – S. 75–78.
14. Slobodchikova S. N. Obshcherossiyskoye golosovaniye – novella 2020 g.? // Konstitutsionnoye i munitsipal’noye pravo. – 2021. – № 7. – S. 41–44.
15. Cheshko S. V. Retsenziya na knigu Guboglo M. N. Energiya doveriya. Opyt etnosotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya referenduma v Krymu 16 marta 2014. – Kishinev: F.E. – P. «TIPOGRAFIA CENTRALĂ», 2014. – 222 s. // Vestnik antropologii. – 2015. – № 2 (30). – S. 157–161.
16. Nebol’sina Ye. V. Vliyaniye «Breksit» na doveriye k nauchnomu znaniyu v Velikobritanii // Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya. – 2017. – № 6. – S. 61–65; https://doi.org/10.24158/tipor.2017.6.14.
17. Kaplunova D. A. Pod”yem yevroskeptitsizma kak indikator neobkhodimosti reformirovaniya YES // PolitBook. – 2016. – № 2. – S. 155–164.
18. Tskhadaya N. D., Bezgodov D. N. Opornyy karkas gorodov Respubliki Komi: istoriya i logika odnoy universitetskoy initsiativy / Politicheskiye, ekonomicheskiye i sotsiokul’turnyye aspekty regional’nogo upravleniya na Yevropeyskom Severe : materialy XIV Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii (s mezhdunarodnym uchastiyem), 22–23 aprelya 2021 g. – Syktyvkar: Komi respublikanskaya akademiya gosudarstvennoy sluzhby i upravleniya, 2021. – S. 21–25.
19. Kulikova S. A. Uchastiye trudyashchikhsya v upravlenii delami gosudarstva v sovetskiy period: formy osushchestvleniya, konstitutsionno-pravovoye regulirovaniye, realizatsiya i mifotvorchestvo / Politicheskiye riski razvitiya gosudarstva i obshchestva v sovremennom mire : sbornik nauchnykh statey po materialam Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Saratovskiy natsional’nyy issledovatel’skiy gosudarstvennyy universitet imeni N. G. Chernyshevskogo, 21 maya 2021 g. – Saratov: Saratovskiy istochnik, 2021. – S. 81–91.
20. Listopad L. V. Innovatsii v sfere upravleniya kadrami gosudar-stvennogo apparata: opyt Rossiyskoy Federatsii / Ekonomika i regional’noye upravleniye : sbornik statey mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, 6–7 dekabrya 2017 g. – Bryansk: Bryanskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet imeni akademika I. G. Petrovskogo, 2017. – S. 233–236.
21. Baturin Yu. M. Konstitutsiya kak iskusstvo razvyazki v klassicheskoy tragedii // Konstitutsionnoye pravo: vostochnoyevropeyskoye obozreniye. – 2004. – № 2 (47). – S. 147–158.
22. Sergeyev A. A. Ob ogranichenii predmeta referenduma Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Konstitutsionnoye i munitsipal’noye pravo. – 2008. – № 19. – S. 7–12.
23. Klychev R. A. Konstitutsionalizatsiya pravovogo regulirovaniya referenduma kak instrumenta realizatsii narodovlastiya // Konstitutsionnoye i munitsipal’noye pravo. – 2019. – № 4. – S. 14–17.
24. Spirina A. S. Institutsional’noye doveriye i korruptsiya: otsenka vzaimosvyazi // Sotsial’naya integratsiya i razvitiye etnokul’tur v yevraziyskom prostranstve. – 2021. – T. 1. – № 10. – S. 168–172.
