Saint-Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
UDK 342.98 Право должностных лиц
Introduction. A wide range of tasks facing internal affairs bodies, a significant load on police officials, as well as the direct dependence of law and order on the effectiveness of their activities – all this determines the relevance of the search for ways to optimise the administrative and procedural status of a police officer. On a daily basis, police officials carry out proceedings on cases of administrative offences, regularly conduct reception of citizens (including complaints proceedings). A police official often has an official need to take part in administrative proceedings. In addition, within the framework of intra-organisational service relations, each police officer is a potential participant in disciplinary, performance appraisal and promotion proceedings. The aim of this article: on the basis of achievements of administrative-procedural theory to formulate new conclusions about the concept and content of the status of a police official as a participant of administrative-procedural relations, to classify types of administrative-procedural proceedings with the participation of police officials. Methods. General methods of cognition (comparison, analysis, synthesis, abstraction, system, structural and functional approach) were used in the work. Results. The concept of administrative-procedural relations, a participant of which is a police official, is formulated; types of administrative proceedings, a potential participant of which is a police official, are defined, and their classification by various criteria is carried out; some shortcomings of administrative-procedural legislation, enshrining the status of a police official as a participant of administrative-procedural relations, are revealed.
administrative process, administrative procedural relations, administrative procedural proceedings, police official, administrative court proceedings, proceedings on cases of administrative offences, disciplinary proceedings
1. Sorokin V. D. Administrativnyy process i administrativno-processual'noe pravo : [monografiya]. – Sankt-Peterburg: Izdatel'stvo Yuridicheskogo instituta. – 2002. – 474 s.
2. Bahrah D. N. Administrativno-processual'naya deyatel'nost' gosudarstvennoy administracii // Administrativnoe pravo i process. – 2009. – № 3. – S. 2–7.
3. Stepanova V. A., Zverev V. S. O nekotoryh problemnyh voprosah podhodov k ponimaniyu administrativnogo processa / Pravoprimenitel'naya deyatel'nost': istoriya i sovremennost' : materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferencii, posvyaschennoy pamyati docenta M. V. Gevorkyana, Pskov, 27 iyunya 2017 g. – Pskov: Pskovskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 2017. – S. 98–105.
4. Kononov P. I. Administrativnyy process i administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo: diskussionnye voprosy ponimaniya i sootnosheniya // Administrativnoe pravo i process. – 2014. – № 3. – S. 45–49.
5. Salischeva N. G. Administrativnyy process v SSSR. – Moskva: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1964. – 158 s.
6. Starilov Yu. N. Administrativnaya yusticiya : Problemy teorii : [monografiya]. – Voronezh: Izdatel'stvo Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 1998. – 197 s.
7. Zelencov A. B., Yastrebov O. A. Sovremennye modeli administrativno-processual'nogo regulirovaniya: opyat sravnitel'no-pravovogo issledovaniya // Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. – 2022. – T. 15, № 3. – S. 96–130; https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2022.3.96.130.
8. Kononov P. I. Neskol'ko tezisov v podderzhku integrativnogo ponimaniya administrativnogo processa // Sibirskoe yuridicheskoe obozrenie. – 2021. – T. 18, № 3. – S. 328–338; https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-3-328-338.
9. Stahov A. I. Integrativnaya teoriya administrativnogo processa – edinstvenno vernaya osnova postroeniya modeli administrativnogo processa // Sibirskoe yuridicheskoe obozrenie. – 2021. – T. 18, № 3. – S. 313–327; https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-3-313-327
10. Kaplunov A. I. Sovremennye podhody k ponimaniyu administrativnogo processa kak rezul'tat i osnova razvitiya otechestvennogo administrativno-processual'nogo zakonodatel'stva // Sibirskoe yuridicheskoe obozrenie. – 2021. – T. 18, № 3. – S. 261–276; https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-3-261-276.
11. Kaplunov A. I. O pravovoy prirode i processual'nyh formah administrativnogo processa / Aktual'nye problemy administrativnogo i administrativno-processual'nogo prava (Sorokinskie chteniya) : sbornik statey po materialam Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, posvyaschennoy pamyati doktora yuridicheskih nauk, professora, zasluzhennogo deyatelya nauki Rossiyskoy Federacii, zasluzhennogo yurista Rossiyskoy Federacii Avrutina Yuriya Efremovicha v svyazi s 75-letiem so dnya rozhdeniya, Sankt-Peterburg, 25 marta 2022 g. – Sankt-Peterburg: Sankt-Peterburgskiy universitet MVD Rossii, 2022. – S. 212–220.
12. Sorokin V. D. O soderzhanii i vidah administrativno-processual'nyh pravootnosheniy // Pravovedenie. – 1968. – № 2. – S. 51–58.
13. Lapina M. A. Institut disciplinarnogo proizvodstva: teoriya i praktika // Zakon. Pravo. Gosudarstvo. – 2016. – № 2 (10). – S. 75–89.
14. Presnyakov M. V., Channov S. E. Sub'ekt disciplinarnoy yurisdikcii v sluzhebnyh otnosheniyah: koncentrirovannaya i raspredelitel'naya sistemy disciplinarnoy vlasti // Administrativnoe pravo i process. – 2020. – № 12. – S. 11–17.
15. Sarpekov R. K., Shishimbaeva S. S. Administrativno-procedurnye i administrativno-processual'nye otnosheniya: ponyatie, osobennosti i ih sootnoshenie // Vestnik Instituta zakonodatel'stva i pravovoy informacii Respubliki Kazahstan. – 2019. – № 2 (56). – S. 44–51.
