employee from 01.01.2023 to 01.01.2024
Sankt-Peterburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
UDK 343.97 Преступление как общественное явление. Сравнительная преступность. Причины и последствия преступлений. Социальные факторы преступления. Социальное окружение
The article deals with the attempt to comprehend the phenomenon of corruption through a set of different scientific approaches and its place in the social system of modern society (social matrix). The research is based on the necessity to understand the nature of this phenomenon, its role in social mechanisms and transformations and, as a result, to determine the direction of counteraction to corruption acts. Introduction: The study of corruption as a socio-cultural phenomenon in the matrix of modern society through a set of different approaches (legal, deviantological, economic, psychological, socio-cultural) is predetermined by the problem of understanding the epistemology of the phenomenon under consideration. This directly affects the effectiveness of anticorruption efforts and the qualitative content of the mechanism for counteracting corruption behavior. Purpose: analysis of corruption as a social phenomenon from the perspective of various scientific approaches in the conditions of formation and transformation of social relations and institutions and presentation of the author’s understanding of the content and essence of this phenomenon. Methodology, methods and techniques. The research was based on the dialectical method in combination with other general scientific methods: logical-epistemological, epistemological, epistemological, rationalistic deduction, analysis, comparison, etc., as well as special methods of scientific cognition - legal, sociological, etc. Results: scientific views on the content and essence of corruption as a negative phenomenon and its place in the social matrix of modern society were analysed: the main directions of counteracting corruption through the adoption of appropriate measures by social institutions were proposed. Scientific novelty: the scientists’ viewpoints on corruption as a phenomenon and an inevitable component of all social institutions, as well as the author’s substantiated position of defining the essence of corruption as a socio-cultural phenomenon contribute to the fundamental knowledge of the phenomenon under consideration and its role in developing and transforming social relations and other phenomena. Practical significance: the results of the research are aimed at supplementing the existing scientific knowledge about corruption, forming a theoretical and applied basis for counteracting this negative social phenomenon in modern society.
corruption phenomenon, social matrix, social institutions, consumer society, counteraction to corruption
1. Antonyan, Yu. M., Kudryavcev, V. N., Eminov, V. E. (2004). Lichnost’ prestupnika. Saint Petersburg: Yuridicheskij centr Press.
2. Bavsun, M. V. (2023). Chetvertaya promyshlennaya revolyuciya kak triumf dominirovaniya tekhnologicheskih imperativov v sovremennom obshchestve. V I. A. Minnikes (otv. red.), Bajkal’skie komparativistskie chteniya: materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii, (Irkutsk, 17-18 marta 2023 goda, str. 214-219). Irkutsk: Bajkal’skij gosudarstvennyj universitet.
3. Baranov, V. M. (2002). Tenevoe pravo: monografiya. Nizhnij Novgorod: Nizhegorodskaya akademiya MVD Rossii.
4. Benfild, E. (2019). Moral’nye osnovy otstalogo obshchestva (per. s angl. D. A. Karel’skij). Moskow: Novoe izdatel’stvo.
5. Bibik, O. N. (2016). Kul’turologicheskie aspekty protivodejstviya prestupnosti. Vestnik Krasnodarskogo universiteta MVD Rossii, 2 (32), 21-28.
6. Bodrijyar, Zh. (2021). Obshchestvo potrebleniya (per. s franc. E. A. Samarskaya). Moskow: AST.
7. Vannovskaya, O. V. (2009). Lichnostnye determinanty korrupcionnogo povedeniya. Izvestiya Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gercena, 102, 323-324.
8. Vannovskaya, O. V. (2023). Psihologiya korrupcionnogo povedeniya gosudarstvennyh sluzhashchih: monografiya, 2-e izd., ster. Moskow: Yurajt.
9. Veblen, T. B. (1984). Teoriya prazdnogo klassa (per. s angl.) Moskow: Progress.
10. Galickij, E., Levin, M. (2007). Korrupcionnye otnosheniya biznesa i vlasti (opyt empiricheskogo analiza). Voprosy ekonomiki, 1, 19-32. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2007-1-19-32
11. Gilinskij, Ya. I. (2009). Globalizaciya, deviantnost’, social’nyj kontrol’: sbornik statej. Saint Petersburg: DEAN.
12. Gilinskij, Ya. I. (2022). Deviantologiya postmoderna. Rossijskij deviantologicheskij zhurnal, 2 (1), 10-16. https://doi. org/10.35750/2713-0622-2022-1-10-16
13. Golik, Yu. V., Karasev, V. I. (2005). Korrupciya kak mekhanizm social’noj degradacii: monografiya. Moskow: Yuridicheskij centr Press.
14. Gelbrejt, Dzh. K. (2018). Obshchestvo izobiliya (per. s angl. G. I. Agafonov, E. B. Golovlyanicina, I. V. Nogaev i dr.) Moskow: Olimp-biznes.
15. De Graaf, Dzh., Vann, D., Neĭlor, T. (2005). Potreblyatstvo. Bolezn’, ugrozhayushchaya miru (per. s angl. N. Makarovoj). Ekaterinburg: Ul’tra. Kul’tura.
16. De Soto, E. (1995). Inoj put’. Nevidimaya revolyuciya v tret’em mire (per. s angl. B. Pinsker). Moskow: Catallaxy.
17. Epifanova, N. (2007). Issledovanie korrupcii na osnove metodov ekonomicheskoj teorii. Voprosy ekonomiki, 1, 33-44. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2007-1-33-44
18. Zhuravlev, A. L., Yurevich, A. V. (2014). Psihologicheskie faktory korrupcii. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya, 7, 63-71.
19. Zolaev, E. A. (2023). Ekonomika korrupcii. Tenevaya ekonomika, 7 (2), 161-170. https://doi.org/10.18334/tek.7.2.117963
20. Infant’ev, K. A. (2001). Vliyanie transformacionnogo krizisa na harakter tenevyh yavlenij v ekonomike Rossii. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii, 3 (11), 103-104.
21. Kabanov, P. A., Rajkov, G. I., Chirkov, D. K. (2008). Politicheskaya korrupciya v usloviyah reformirovaniya rossijskoj gosudarstvennosti na rubezhe vekov: monografiya. Moskow: Izdatel’stvo «Druzhba narodov».
22. Kitova, D. A. (2020). Psihologo-pravovye osobennosti otnosheniya k korrupcii studentov iz razlichnyh rossijskih regionov. Nauchnye trudy Moskovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta, 5, 76-91. https://doi.org/10.17805/trudy.2020.5.9
23. Kuplenskij, A. A., Petelina, L. V. (1997). Psihologiya korrupcii. Psihopedagogika v pravoohranitel’nyh organah, 2 (6), 59-61.
24. Loskutov, V. A. (2006). Postsovetskij totalitarizm: “yakornye stoyanki” rossijskoj vlasti. Ekaterinburg: Ural’skaya akad. gos. sluzhby.
25. Matvejchev, O. A., Akopyan, A. (2018). Mify o korrupcii: monografiya. Moskow: Knizhnyj mir.
26. Mel’nik, A. S., Stebeneva, E. V. (2018). Preduprezhdenie prestuplenij korrupcionnoj napravlennosti s uchetom osobennos¬tej lichnosti korrupcionera. V N. A. Korsikova (sost.), Sistema profilaktiki prestupnosti: sovremennoe sostoyanie, problemy i perspektivy razvitiya: materialy mezhvedomstvennogo Kruglogo stola (g. Sankt-Peterburg, 26 okty¬abrya 2018 g., str. 179-183). Saint Petersburg: Sankt-Peterburgskij universitet MVD Rossii.
27. Mel’nichuk, T. V. (2013). Kriminogennyj potencial postindustrial’nogo obshchestva: analiz riskov. Vserossijskij kriminologicheskij zhurnal, 4, 155-162.
28. Noel’-Nojman, E. (1996). Obshchestvennoe mnenie. Otkrytie spirali molchaniya (per. s nem.) Moskow: Progress: Ves’ Mir.
29. Ovcharov, A. S. (2003). Korrupciya v sisteme tenevyh ekonomicheskih otnoshenij: avtoref. … kand. ekon. nauk. Volgograd.
30. Ovchinskij, A. S., Chebotareva, S. O. (2008). Matrica prestupnosti. Moskow: Norma.
31. Osipov, G. V., Karepova, S. G., Klimovickij, S. V. i dr. (2019). Korrupciya kak societal’nyj fenomen: sociologicheskie, social’no-psihologicheskie i ekonomicheskie aspekty analiza: kollektivnaya monografiya. Moskow, Saint Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya.
32. Reshetnikov, M. M. (2023). Psihologiya korrupcii. Utopiya i antiutopiya: monografiya, 2-e izd. Moskow: Yurajt.
33. Rouz-Akkerman, S. (2003). Korrupciya i gosudarstvo. Prichiny, sledstviya, reformy (per. s angl. O. A. Alyakrinskogo). Moskow: Logos.
34. Satarov, G. A. (red.) (2013). Rossijskaya korrupciya: uroven’, struktura, dinamika: opyt sociologicheskogo analiza. Moskow: Fond «Liberal’naya Missiya».
35. Simonenko, A. V., Gribanov, E. V. (2017). Ugolovnaya politika i kul’tura protivodejstviya prestupnosti v Rossii: sostoyanie i perspektivy. Obshchestvo i pravo, 3 (61), 10-16.
36. Stebeneva, E. V. (2011). Sotrudnik organov vnutrennih del kak special’nyj sub”ekt korrupcionnyh prestuplenij: ugolovno-pravovye i kriminologicheskie aspekty: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Saint Petersburg.
37. Strong, T., Lok, E. (2021). Kak ustroena matrica? Social’noe konstruirovanie real’nosti: teoriya i praktika. Seriya «Obraz obshchestva» (per. s angl. D. V. Onegov, A. V. Zinder, K. M. Zinder, A. Mirzoyanc). Elektronnaya kniga: AO «VCIOM». URL: https://www.litres.ru/book/tom-strong-31686513/kak-ustroena-matrica-socialnoe-konstruirovanie-realnos-66877138/chitat-onlayn/page-5/
38. Suhonos, S. I. (2014). Kn. 2: Matrica social’nogo razvitiya. Moskow: Del’fis.
39. Ukolova, D. V., Simonova, O. A. (2015). 2015. 01. 015. Aspers P., Godar F. Sociologiya mody: poryadok i izmenenie. Aspers R., Godart F. Sociology of fashion: order and change // annual rev. of sociology. - Palo Alto (Ca), 2013. - Vol. 39. - p. 171-192. Social’nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Ser. 11, Sociologiya: Referativnyj zhurnal, 1, 129-138.
40. Fromm, E. (2004). Imet’ ili byt’? Radi lyubvi k zhizni (per. N. I. Vojskunskaya). Moskow: Aĭris-Press.
41. Fromm, E. (1986). Imet’ ili byt’ (per. s angl. N. I. Vojskunskoj, I. I. Kamenkovich). Moskow: Progress.
42. Fromm, E. (2019). Zdorovoe obshchestvo (per. s angl. T. V. Banketovoj, S. V. Karpushinoj). Moskow: AST.
43. Curikov, A., Curikov, V. (2007). Ekonomicheskij podhod k analizu korystnyh prestuplenij. Voprosy ekonomiki, 1, 45-54. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2007-1-45-54
44. Chernysheva, E. V. (2018). Psihologiya korrupcionnogo povedeniya: monografiya. Ekaterinburg: Ural’skij yuridicheskij institut MVD Rossii.
45. Shestakov, D. A. (2011). Vvedenie v kriminologiyu zakona. Saint Petersburg: Yuridicheskij centr Press.
46. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of Capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241-258) (per. s angl.) New York, Greenwood. https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/fr/bourdieu-forms-capital.htm
47. Becker, G. S. (2009). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. Edition: 3. University of Chicago Press.
48. Kammigan, I. (2023). Reflecting on the Interaction of Self-Control and Morality in Situational Action Theory: Comparing Absolute and Relative Effects of Self-control in 28 Countries. J Quant Criminol, 39, 465-493 (2023). https: //doi. org/10.1007/s10940-022-09541-0
49. Ekelund, R. B., & Tollison, R. D. (1981). Mercantilism as a Rent-seeking Society: Economic Regulation in Historical Perspective. College Station, Tex.: Texas A&M University Press.
50. Zargar, Y., & Sarani, F. (2021). Socio-political Perfectionism: A Cross-cultural Study. Journal of Modern Psychology, 1 (4), 9-21. https://doi.org/10.22034/jmp.2022.324954.1026
