from 01.01.2014 until now
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
UDK 159.99 Прочие вопросы психологии
Introduction. Young people, as the most potentially passionate part of the society, are characterised by maximalism and a strong desire to conquer the world here and now. However, their immature worldview can easily lead this category of the population to lose their true identity by being influenced by radicals. The radicalisation of mass consciousness in the current global context has become a feature of the modern society, resulting in an obstacle to the positive development of Russia. This fact raises the need for research on the determinants of the formation of radical consciousness in order to further effective preventive activities in this direction. The purpose of the research is to identify the main causes and conditions for the formation of radical consciousness among young people. Methodology, methods and techniques. The conducted research is based on modern scientific, methodological and sociopsychological characteristics of the formation of radical consciousness. The dialectical method, the method of ascending from the abstract to the concrete, comparative studies, and axiological interpretation are used. The results of the research testify to the relevance of the issue of study, especially in the current conditions of society development. The main, and at the same time, diverse (social, psychological, cultural, political) aspects contributing to the formation of radical views of young people are analysed. The scientific novelty of the article is substantiated by the analysis of the existing world environment (maximally favourable for the formation of radical consciousness) and the scientific researches performed within the framework of the subject, which made it possible to conclude that the problem under consideration is underdeveloped. Practical significance. The results of the research can fill the existing gap in the study of the mentioned subject and become a support for further comprehensive problem examination, as well as contribute to preparing scientific support for preventive activities in relation to the negative side of radicalism of young people.
radical views, consciousness, youth, causes of radicalism, cultural factor, politics, age crises, religion, morality, values
1. Bashkirov, V. G. (2013). Smert’ cheloveka v istorii religioznoj mysli i v svyatootecheskom predanii. Trudy Minskoj duhovnoj akademii, 11, 26-67.
2. Vundt, V. (2001). Problemy psihologii narodov. Saint Petersburg: Piter.
3. Gellner, E. (1995). Usloviya svobody. Moskow: Ad Marginem.
4. Guggenbyul’. A. (2021). Zloveshchee ocharovanie nasiliya. Profilaktika detskoj agressivnosti i zhestokosti. Moskow: Institut obshchegumanitarnyh issledovanij.
5. Derrida, ZH. (2006). Prizraki Marksa (per. s franc. B. Skuratova, pod obshchej red. D. Novikova). Moskow: Logos-altera, izdatel’stvo «Esse homo».
6. Dzhonson, R., Rul’, Dzh. (2018). Prozhivaya svoyu neprozhituyu zhizn’ (per. s angl.), 2-e izd., (el.) Moskow: Institut obshchegumanitarnyh issledovanij.
7. Dil’tej, V. (2001). Sushchnost’ filosofii (per. s nemec. Pod red. M. E. Cel’tera). Moskow: Intrada.
8. Zimmel’, G. (1996a). Social’naya differenciaciya. Sociologicheskie i psihologicheskie issledovaniya. V Izbrannoe. Tom vtoroj. Sozercanie zhizni (str. 301). Moskow: Yurist.
9. Zimmel’, G. (1996b). Problema religioznogo polozheniya. V Izbrannoe. Tom pervyj. Filosofiya kul’tury (str. 651-662). Moskow: Yurist.
10. Zlokazov, K. V., Karayani, A. G., Prokurova, N. S. (2022). Radikalizaciya predstavlenij molodezhi o roli religii v obshchestve metodami kognitivnoj vojny. Psihopedagogika v pravoohranitel’nyh organah, 27 (3(90)), 246-256. https://10. 24412/1999-6241-2022-390-246-256
11. Konopleva, A. A. (2019). Kul’turnye predpochteniya Z-pokoleniya (na osnove rezul’tatov sociologicheskogo issledovaniya). Manuskript. Tambov: Gramota, 12 (9), 146-150. https://doi.org/10.30853/manuscript.2019.9.31
12. Ponomarenko, V. V. (2019). Prakticheskaya harakterologiya. Metodika 7 radikalov. Moskow: OOO «Izdatel’stvo AST».
13. Samojlov, S. F., Nasirov, M. N. (2016). K probleme razlicheniya ponyatij social’nogo i politicheskogo radikalizma. Obshchestvo: politika, ekonomika, pravo, 2, 13-17.
14. Habermas, Yu. (1991). Ponyatie individual’nosti. V I. T. Frolov (red.), O chelovecheskom v cheloveke: sbornik (str. 195-207). Moskow: Politizdat.
15. Habermas, Yu. (1995). Lekciya vtoraya. Filosofskij spor vokrug idei demokratii. V Demokratiya. Razum. Otvetstvennost’. Moskovskie lekcii i interv’yu (str. 33-57). Moskow: Akademiya.
16. Shneir, M. (red.) (1992). Feminizm: proza, memuary, pis’ma: (per. s angl.) Moskow: Progress: Litera.
17. Shpengler, O. (1999). Zakat Evropy. Ocherki morfologii mirovoj istorii. Minsk: OOO «Popuri».
18. Yung, K. G. (2020). Chelovek i ego simvoly: monografiya (per. s angl. V. V. Zelenskij). Moskow: Institut obshchegumanitarnyh issledovanij.
19. Formosa, P. (2007). Is radical evil banal? Is ban al evil radical? Philosophy & Social Criticism, 33 (6), 717-735.
20. Gielen, U. P. (1986). Moral reasoning in radical and non-radical german students. Cross-Cultural Research, 20 (1-4), 71- 109.
21. Lee, F. S. (2004). History and identity: the case of radical economics and radical economists, 1945-70. Review of Radical Political Economics, 36 (2), 177-195. https://10.1177/0486613404264193
22. Murphy, L., & Livingstone, J. (1985). Racism and the limits of radical feminlsm. Race and Class, 26 (4), 61-70.
23. Rooduijn, M., Burgoon, B., van Elsas, E. J., & van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2017). Radical distinction: support for radical left and radical right parties in Europe. European Union Politics, 18 (4), 536-559. https://10.1177/1465116517718091
