graduate student from 01.01.2020 until now
Omsk, Omsk, Russian Federation
UDK 343 Уголовное право. Уголовное судопроизводство. Криминология. Криминалистика
The article deals with the legislative differentiation of criminal responsibility for violating labor protection requirements (art. 143 of the Criminal Code) depending on the consequences occurred. The author outlines the historical aspects of legislating the aggravating circumstances for violating labor protection requirements. The legal description of the disposition of Article 143 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation in the part concerning the dispositions of related crimes with such a description is compared with other crimes against the labor rights of citizens. The opinions of scholars/ scientists regarding the need to increase the level of criminal law protection of safe labor are analyzed. Justifying the increased degree of public danger in committing the relevant act with concomitant deliberate or repeated violation of the established requirements, the occurrence of consequences in the form of causing serious harm to the health of two or more persons, as well as other severe consequences, the author identifies the problem of downplaying the significance of criminal legal protection of safe labor at the present stage. Gaps in the legislative regulation of some qualifying aggravating circumstances and the lack of consideration in the law of the degree of public danger in case of deliberate or repeated violation of labor protection requirements are pointed out. Taking into account the fact that aggravating circumstances are essential the significance of aggravating circumstances for qualifying a crime, affecting the degree of guilt and the danger of a crime or the responsibility of the perpetrator, the author underlines the importance of improving the criminal law in the relevant part.
aggravating circumstances, public danger, labor protection, crime, criminal liability
1. Veklenko V. V., Nikolaev K. D. Otyagchayuschie obstoyatel'stva hischeniy : monografiya. - Omsk: Omskaya akademiya MVD Rossii, 2009. - 274 s.
2. Borodin S. V. Otvetstvennost' za ubiystvo: kvalifikaciya i nakazanie po rossiyskomu pravu. - Moskva: Yurist, 1994. - 204 s.
3. Kaburneev E. V. Ponyatie kvalificiruyuschih priznakov i ih rol' v differenciacii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za ubiystvo // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. - 2007. -№. 4. - S. 70-73.
4. Tatarnikov V. G. Nekotorye voprosy sovershenstvovaniya norm ob ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za prestupleniya, sovershennye po neostorozhnosti // Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnicheskogo universiteta. - 2007. - T. 3. - №. 1 (29). - S. 166-170.
5. Nurkaeva T. N., Divaeva I. R. Narushenie trebovaniy ohrany truda: voprosy tolkovaniya, kvalifikacii i sovershenstvovaniya zakonodatel'stva // Aktual'nye problemy prava i gosudarstva v XXI veke. - 2017. - T. 9. - №. 1. - S. 100-106.
6. Belyaeva I. M. Ob'ektivnye priznaki prestupleniya, predusmotrennogo st. 143 UK RF // Vestnik YuUrGU. Seriya: Pravo. - 2007. - № 4 (76). S. 44-47.
7. Petrashko I. A. Mery sovershenstvovaniya ugolovno-pravovoy zaschity trudovyh prav grazhdan // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve. - 2012. - № 1. - URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/mery-sovershenstvovaniya-ugolovno-pravovoy-zaschity-trudovyh-prav-grazhdan (data obrascheniya: 30.10.2022).
8. Kurmanov A. S. Puti sovershenstvovaniya ugolovno-pravovoy normy, napravlennoy na ohranu prava na bezopasnye usloviya truda // Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravoohranitel'naya praktika. - 2011. - № 4 (18). - S. 29-35.
9. Hodusov A. A. Narushenie trebovaniy ohrany truda v deystvuyuschem zakonodatel'stve Rossii i zarubezhnyh stran // Bezopasnost' biznesa. - 2016. -№ 2. - S. 15-18.
10. Dagel' P. S. Usloviya ustanovleniya ugolovnoy nakazuemosti // Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedeniy. Pravovedenie. - 1975. - №. 4. - S. 67-74.
