Irkutsk, Irkutsk region, Russian Federation
UDK 340.1 Виды и формы права. Направления в теории права
Currently the key direction of criminal policy is to ensure state, public and personal security. The novelty of the research consists in characterization of the concept of criminal offence and its constituent features at different historical stages, considering political, legal, socio-economic and socio-cultural factors. The authors pay special attention to the relationship of legal values, scientific doctrine and law enforcement activities in the development of the definition of crime. The methodological basis of the study is a set of general and special scientific methods that lead to a comprehensive approach to the study of criminal law policy in the field of legislative definition of a crime as a legal category and its constituent features. As a result of the research the authors explore the legal nature of the crime, its essential properties and characteristics as a negative social and legal phenomenon, and show the trends in the regulatory process. The article shows the interdependence of the criminal law policy implemented in Russia and the legislative formula of the concept of crime at different stages of the formation and development of the national statehood, both by the ongoing political, legal and socio-economic transformations, and by the achievements in the theoretical and legal and criminal law doctrine at the national level. Conclusions. The authors offer an explanation to the factors that inspire the legislative regulation of the concept of crime and determine the tendencies of the legislative formalization of the concept and signs of crime in the domestic and foreign science of criminal law. Finally, the authors suggest a perspective on the correlation of formal and material signs of a crime as a criminal legal category.
legal policy, criminal law policy, criminal law, crime, criminal offense
1. Avdeeva O. A., Avdeev V. A. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie osnovy pravovoy ocenki negativnyh posledstviy kak osnovaniya realizacii yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti // Yuridicheskiy mir. - 2019. - № 7. - S. 54-58.
2. Baumshteyn A. B., Ponyatovskaya T. G. Ugolovnyy prostupok: est' li neobhodimost' vvedeniya? // Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya i pravo. - 2019. - № 9 (6). - S. 68-74.
3. Bekkaria Ch. O prestupleniyah i nakazaniyah. - Moskva: Yuridicheskoe izdvtel'stvo NKYu SSSR, 1939. - 464 s.
4. Budzinskiy S. Nachala ugolovnogo prava. - Varshava: Tip. I. Yavorskogo, 1870. - 362 s.
5. Vavilov K. K. O nakazuemosti kak priznake ponyatiya prestupleniya // Pravovedenie. - 1964. - № 1. - S. 164-165.
6. Vasil'eva D. D. Nekotorye voprosy realizacii ugolovnogo prostupka v sovremennom zakonodatel'stve // Vestnik sovremennyh issledovaniy. - 2021. - № 5-4 (43). - S. 8-10.
7. Gercenzon A. A. Ponyatie prestupleniya v sovetskom ugolovnom prave. - Moskva: Gosyurizdat, 1955. - 55 s.
8. Durmanov N. D. Ponyatie prestupleniya / Akad. nauk SSSR. In-t prava. - Moskva; Leningrad: 2-ya tipografiya Izdatel'stva Akademii nauk SSSR, 1948 (Moskva). - 311 s.
9. Kibal'nik A. G. Ugolovnyy prostupok i ego pravovye posledstviya // Ugolovnoe pravo. - 2017. - № 4. - S. 65-68.
10. Ortolan J. L. E. Cours de legislation penale comparee. Introduction. - T. I. - Paris: Joubert, 1839. - 235 p.
11. Piontkovskiy A. A. Uchenie o prestuplenii po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu. - Moskva: Gosyurizdat, 1961. - 666 s.
12. Sergievskiy N. D. Russkoe ugolovnoe pravo. Posobie k lekciyam: Chast' obschaya. - 7-e izd. - Sankt-Peterburg: Tipografiya M. M. Stasyulevicha, 1908. - 385 c.
13. Spasovich V. Uchebnik Ugolovnogo prava. - T. I. - Vypusk pervyy. - Sankt-Peterburg: V tipografii Iosofata Ogrizko, 1863. - 178 s.
14. Tagancev N. S. Russkoe ugolovnoe pravo. - Chast' Obschaya. - T. I. - Tula: Avtograf, 2001. - 800 s.
15. Utevskiy B. S. Nekotorye voprosy dal'neyshego razvitiya teorii ugolovnogo prava // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. - 1963. - № 6. - S. 42-44.
16. Shargorodskiy M. D. Predmet i sistema ugolovnogo prava // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. - 1941. - № 4. - S. 42-43.
