Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
This article deals with the process of criminal law protection of witnesses and victims. The legislation of the state establishes certain normative acts regulating this branch of law. It is necessary to clearly and strictly observe all measures. The world experience of this issue was also studied, where the Human Rights Convention was used. It is worth noting that each country has its own procedures and legislation, the experience of criminal legal protection is very different from the Russian legislative model of criminal legal protection of witnesses and victims. The purpose of the study is to study the criminal law protection of witnesses and victims. Main results of the study: 1. Criminal-legal protection in Russia is considered; 2. The world experience of protection of victims and witnesses has been studied; 3. The normative-legal acts in this area have been analyzed. The object of the study is witnesses and victims. The subject of the study is the main measures of criminal law to ensure the protection of citizens. The degree of development of this issue is very extensive. This study was carried out by such scientistsas I. L. Kozochkipa, A. Petrovsky, Kvashis V. E., Zaitsev O. A., Aparova T. V. and others. The research of foreign scientists, such as: Waller I.

Keywords:
defense, victim, witness, law, responsibility
Text
Publication text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Waller I. Victims versus Regina Malefactor: Justice for the Next 100 Years / Criminal Law in Action. – Anthem, 1987. – P. 421–429.

2. Kozochkina P. L. Ugolovnoe zakonodatel'stvo zarubezhnyh stran (Angliya, SShA, Franciya, Germaniya, Yaponiya) : sbornik zakonodatel'nyh materialov. – Moskva: Zercalo, 2001. – 352 c.

3. Petrovskiy A. Kak nam zaschitit' uchastnikov sudebnogo razbiratel'stva // Sovetskaya yusticiya. – 1991. – № 16. – S. 14–19.

4. Kvashis V. E. Pomozhem zhertvam prestupleniy // Rossiyskaya yusticiya. – 1994. – № 4. – S. 48–49.

5. Zaycev O. A. Gosudarstvennaya zaschita uchastnikov ugolovnogo processa. – Moskva: Ekzamen, 2003. – 510 c.

6. Aparova T. V. Sudy i sudebnyy process Velikobritanii. – Moskva: Nauka, 1996. – 157 c.

7. Luneev V. V. Desyatyy kongress OON po preduprezhdeniyu prestupnosti i obrascheniyu s pravonarushitelyami, ego mesto v istorii kongressov // Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 2000. – № 9. – S. 95–100.

8. Popova L., Popov N. Zakonodatel'stvo ob ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za prinuzhdenie k dache pokazaniy: istoricheskie i sravnitel'no-pravovye aspekty // Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2003. – № 3. – S. 53–66.

9. Trefilov A. A. Ugolovnyy process zarubezhnyh stran. – T. 1 (15). – Moskva: NIPKC Voshod-A, 2016. – 1019 s.

10. Dil'barhanova Zh. R. Obespechenie konstitucionnyh prav grazhdan – osnovnoe napravlenie reformirovaniya ugolovno-processual'nogo zakonodatel'stva Respubliki Kazahstan // Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravoohranitel'naya praktika. – 2016. – № 2 (36) – S.154–159.

11. Alimamedov E. N. Obespechenie prav i zakonnyh interesov poterpevshego ili ego predstaviteley pri oznakomlenii s materialami ugolovnogo dela / Sovremennyy vzglyad na buduschee nauki : sbornik statey Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. – Ch. 3. – Ufa: Aeterna, 2016. – S. 117–119.

12. Mel'nikova E. F. Realii primeneniya zakonodatel'stva o gosudarstvennoy zaschite uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii. – 2018. – № 3 (43). – S. 253–260.

13. Golovina E. V. Obespechenie bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo processa v sisteme mer preodoleniya protivodeystviya rassledovaniyu dolzhnostnyh prestupleniy // Vestnik Vostochno-Sibirskogo instituta MVD Rossii. – 2019. – № 1 (88). – S. 150–161.

14. Anopko O. A. Razglashenie tayny predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya kak proyavlenie protivodeystviya rassledovaniyu // Vestnik Vostochno-Sibirskogo instituta MVD Rossii. – 2019. – № 1 (88). – S. 76–83.

15. Avdeev V. A., Avdeeva O. A. Novye tendencii ugolovno–pravovoy politiki RF v sfere protivodeystviya prestupleniyam // Rossiyskaya yusticiya. – 2017. – № 5. – S. 2–4.