Russian Federation
Russian Federation
UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
GRNTI 10.77 Уголовное право
OKSO 40.06.01 Юриспруденция
BBK 67 Право. Юридические науки
Currently in order to improve the application of the norms of the criminal law, for example, on reasonable risk this retrospective study has been conducted. The importance of improving the position of the norms on reasonable risk, obvious as connection with the development of science and technology situations associated with the risk appears more and accordingly, the task of the criminal law to regulate each of them. The author analyzes the provisions of the norm proposed by scientific practitioners before the appearance of modern standards about reasonable risk modern code in the form of projects. On the basis of social situations associated risk, currently emphasizes the relevance position projects rules about reasonable risk not fixed modern edition of the article. The article is indicated that the situation, previously proposed in develop scientific and practical team’s projects with them and consolidation in the current for today, but not used normal in force discussion of the nature of the provisions will allow objectively solve the issue of criminal legal consequences of action related risk through which caused damage public relations, real protected by law. In particular, the author points to the need to clarify of the mechanism, for the application of criminal law in relation to the rule of reasonable risk, which is a circumstance mitigating punishment and precluding the criminality of an act.
act, criminal responsibility, reasonable risk, mitigating the punishment circumstances, excluding crime acts
1. Berestovoy A. N. Obosnovannyy risk v sisteme obstoyatel'stv, isklyuchayuschih prestupnost' deyaniya / Ugolovnaya politika i pravoprimenitel'naya praktika : sb. nauch. tr. konf. / pod obsch. red. E. N. Rahmanova. - Sankt-Peterburg : Petropolis, 2016. - S. 45-46.
2. Kazakova V. A. Yuridicheskaya ocenka obstoyatel'stv, svyazannyh s obosnovannym riskom i krayney neobhodimost'yu // Vestnik MGLU. Obrazovanie i pedagogicheskie nauki. - 2018. - Vyp. 1 (790). - S. 180-186.
3. Lapsha V. L., Ishigeev V. S., Romanova N. L. Obosnovannyy risk: voprosy pravovoy ocenki s pozicii ugolovnogo zakona // Vestnik DVYuI MVD Rossii. - 2020. - № 4 (53). - S. 37-41.
4. Rarog A. I., Ponyatovskaya T. G. Medicinskiy risk v ugolovnom prave // Vserossiyskiy kriminologicheskiy zhurnal. - 2021. - T. 15. - № 3. - S. 321-331. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.17150/2500- 4255.2021.15(3).321-331
5. Ishigeev V. S., Lapsha V. L., Bondar' A. Ya. Problema obosnovannogo riska v deyatel'nosti sotrudnikov pravoohranitel'nyh organov // Psihopedagogika v pravoohranitel'nyh organah. - 2020. - T. 25. - № 2 (81). - S. 226-231. DOI: 10. 24411/1999-6241-2020-12015
6. Nikulenko A. V., Travnikov A. V. Obstoyatel'stva, isklyuchayuschie prestupnost' deyaniya. Lekciya // Yuridicheskaya nauka: istoriya i sovremennost'. - 2018. - № 10. - S. 88-117.
7. Grinberg M. S. Problema proizvodstvennogo riska v ugolovnom prave. - Moskva : Gosyurizdat, 1963. - 132 s.
8. Grinberg M. S. Moment opravdannogo riska v proizvodstvennom processe i ego ugolovno-pravovoe znachenie // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. - 1954. - № 1. - S. 99-108.
9. Idrisov N. T. Obosnovannyy risk kak obstoyatel'stvo, isklyuchayuschee narushenie ugolovno-pravovyh zapretov v professional'noy medicinskoy deyatel'nosti // Chronos. - 2021. - T. 6. - № 3 (53). - S. 98-100.
10. Malein N. S. Pravo na medicinskiy eksperiment // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. - 1975. - № 11. - S. 35-41.
11. Maleina M. N. Pravovoe regulirovanie ispol'zovaniya chelovekom organov, tkaney i kletok zhivotnyh // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. - 2014. - № 2 (206). - S. 21-27.
12. Semina T. V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' vracha v sovremennoy Rossii : monografiya / T. V. Semina, V. A. Klevno, A. Yu. Gusev, O. V. Veselkina; pod obsch. red. T. V. Seminoy. - Moskva: Prospekt, 2021. - 352 s.
13. Malysheva Yu. Yu. Neotlozhnye aspekty «yatrogennyh prestupleniy» // Sud'ya. - 2020. - № 2. - S. 23-27.
14. Lapsha V. L. Zavedomost' kak priznak, differenciruyuschiy obosnovannyy risk / Pravovye problemy ukrepleniya rossiyskoy gosudarstvennosti : sb. st. Vseross. nauchn.-prakt. konf. - Tomsk: Yuridicheskiy institut TGU, 2020. - S. 11-12.
15. Lapsha V. L. Risk v soznanii sociuma (obschestva) i otnoshenie k nemu // Filosofiya prava. - 2018. - № 4 (87). - S. 20-24.
