ACTUAL ISSUES OF SYSTEMATIZATION OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE ON THE CONDITIONS OF SHOT IN THE FORENSIC BALLISTICS
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
In this research, there was considered a challenge of constructing a system of scientific knowledge of the shot conditions in judicial ballistics. It was observed that there are underlying factors that are intended to ensureits [scientific knowledge] consistency: identification of the list of shot conditions, which require consideration when solving expert-level research tasks on weapons, cartridges and traces of their action; determination of the communication systems in the course of objects’ interaction, which present the result of exposure to the conditions of the shot; classification of the shot conditions based on the grounds significant for solving scientific and practical problems. The article contains the characteristics of a constructive, functional factor (condition) of weapons and cartridges influence, environmental and fire factors, the structure of the target and its physical properties, situational and spatial factors, and projectile energy characteristics. Highlighted are the forms of connections formed in the course of objects’ interaction, proposed are the author’s classifications of forensically significant shooting conditions with them being divided on the basis of the following criteria: production from the object of interaction, production from a natural phenomenon, production method, results weapon operation and utilization, duration of exposure, type of structural connections between interaction objects, number of conditions that apply when firing and the forming traces.

Keywords:
shot conditions, systematization, objects of interaction, forensic ballistics, firearms
References

1. Chulkov I. A. Vliyanie nizkih temperatur na otlozhenie produktov vystrela pri strel'be iz malokalibernogo oruzhiya zavodskogo izgotovleniya // Ekspertnaya praktika. - 1983. - № 21. - S. 28-29.

2. Latyshov I. V. Osobennosti ognestrel'nyh povrezhdeniy na mnogosloynyh ob'ektah // Ekspertnaya praktika. - 2005. - № 58. - S. 64-70.

3. Eysman A. A. Zaklyuchenie eksperta. Struktura i nauchnoe obosnovanie : monografiya. - Moskva: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1971. - 164 s.

4. Shlyahov A. R. O svoystvah ob'ektov i ih otobrazheniyah, izuchaemyh v sudebnoy ekspertize // Novye razrabotki i diskussionnye problemy teorii i praktiki sudebnoy ekspertizy : Ekspress-informaciya. - 1983. - № 5. - S. 10-23.

5. Latyshov I. V. Svoystva i priznaki strelkovogo ognestrel'nogo oruzhiya kak ob'ekta diagnosticheskoy sudebno-ballisticheskoy ekspertizy / Kriminalistika i sudebnaya ekspertiza : nauka, obuchenie, praktika / pod obsch. red. S.P. Kushnirenko : 8-ya (vneocherednaya) Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferenciya. - Sankt-Peterburg: Izdatel'skiy dom SPbGU, 2012. - S. 333-340.

6. Koruhov Yu. G. Kriminalisticheskaya diagnostika pri rassledovanii prestupleniy : nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie. - Moskva: Izdatel'skaya gruppa Norma-Infra, 1998. - 288 s.

7. Shlyahov A. R. Klassifikaciya sudebnyh ekspertiz i tipizaciya ih zadach: materialy k uchen. sovetu. - Moskva: VNIISE, 1977. - 134 s.

8. Avetisyan V. R., Potapova L. F. Vliyanie glushitelya na otlozhenie produktov vystrela pri strel'be iz raznyh vidov oruzhiya // Ekspertnaya tehnika. - 1990. - Vyp. 111. - S. 49-61.

9. Berger V. E. Vliyanie usloviy proizvodstva vystrela na harakter otobrazheniya priznakov v sledah na pulyah // Voprosy kriminalistiki i sudebnoy ekspertizy. - Sb. 2. - Dushanbe: NILSE, - S. 267-270.

10. Kokin A. V. Teoriya i metodicheskie osnovy issledovaniya nareznogo ognestrel'nogo oruzhiya po sledam na pulyah. - Moskva: Yurlitinform, 2010. - 352 s.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?