Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The origin of the judicial fine in Russian penal and criminal procedural law in 2016 actualized researches of the doctrinal approaches to this criminal prosecution alternative and at the moment kind of transaction as well as studies of closed measures in the legislation of foreign states: France, Belgium, Germany, Netherlands, Scotland, etc. In contrast to negative judicial fine evaluation represented in Russian doctrine the thought that the introduction of this measure has become the completion of the alternatives to the criminal prosecution system is put forward and developed in the article. The authors state their idea about two basic conceptual approaches to the judicial fine as the alternative to the criminal prosecution: the reserve versus the best alternative being the issue of the choice for the legislator. Replenishment of the system of alternatives to criminal prosecution with a judicial fine helps to achieve a balance between the punitive potential of criminal proceedings and the incentive norms that provide the person who committed the wrongful act with an additional chance for a normal life in society.

Keywords:
judicial fine, transaction, alternative to the criminal prosecution, non-punishment penal law measure
References

1. Baranova M. A., Kosareva A. M. K voprosu ob effektivnosti sudebnogo shtrafa (stat'ya 25.1 UPK RF) // Vestnik Saratovskoy gosudarstvennoy yuridicheskoy akademii. - 2017. - № 3 (116). - S. 185-190.

2. Besedin G. E. Novoe osnovanie osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti: ocherednoy konfuz rossiyskogo zakonodatelya? // Evraziyskaya advokatura. - 2016. - № 6 (25). - S. 114-118.

3. Komarnickiy O. L. Sudebnyy shtraf kak inaya mera ugolovno-pravovogo haraktera // Yurist'-Pravoved'. - 2017. - № 4 (83). - S. 79-83.

4. Matveeva Ya. M. Institut osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti v rossiyskom ugolovnom prave: modernizaciya i poisk al'ternativnyh sposobov uregulirovaniya ugolovno-pravovogo konflikta: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.08 / Matveeva Yana Maksimovna. - Sankt-Peterburg, 2016. - 220 s.

5. Monahova L. V., Musina A. E. K voprosu ob osvobozhdenii ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti s naznacheniem sudebnogo shtrafa // Mariyskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik. - 2016. - № 4 (19). - S. 65-66.

6. Nasonova I. A., Livenceva A. V. Vozmeschenie uscherba kak obyazatel'noe uslovie osvobozhdeniya lica ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti s naznacheniem sudebnogo shtrafa // Vestnik Voronezhskogo instituta MVD Rossii. - 2018. - № 3. - S. 110-114.

7. Popadenko E. V. Al'ternativnye sredstva razresheniya ugolovno-pravovyh konfliktov v rossiyskom i zarubezhnom prave : monografiya. - Moskva: Yurlitinform, 2009. - 173 s.

8. Popadenko E. V. Poisk al'ternativnyh sredstv razresheniya ugolovno-pravovyh konfliktov kak napravlenie rossiyskoy ugolovnoy politiki // Biblioteka kriminalista. - 2012. - № 1. - S. 78-84.

9. Rehovskiy A. F. Transakciya v rossiyskom ugolovnom processe // Nauchnyy zhurnal Baykal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. - 2017. - № 4. - S. 94-99.

10. Satygin V. D. Primirenie s poterpevshim kak osnovanie osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti: istoriya i praktika // Molodoy uchenyy. - 2015. - № 14. - S. 375-378.

11. Soktoev Z. B. Problemy primeneniya norm o sudebnom shtrafe [Elektronnyy resurs] // Sayt «Otrasli prava». - URL: http://otrasli-prava.rf/article/25783 (data obrascheniya: 12.10.2019).

12. Stepanova I. B., Sokolova O. V. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti s naznacheniem sudebnogo shtrafa: problemy i perspektivy [Elektronnyy resurs] // Sayt «Otrasli prava». - URL: http://otrasli-prava.rf/article/28200 (data obrascheniya: 03.11.2019).

13. Trofimova G. A. Sudebnyy shtraf - al'ternativa? [Elektronnyy resurs] // Sayt «Otrasli prava». - URL: http://otrasli-prava.rf/article/27841 (data obrascheniya: 17.11.2019).

Login or Create
* Forgot password?