employee
Russian Federation
UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
GRNTI 10.79 Уголовно-процессуальное право (уголовный процесс)
The creation of a special conciliation-compensatory mechanism for resolving criminal law conflicts in the economic sphere is an urgent political and legal problem. Without its permission, it is impossible to establish a new system of legal relations in the economic sphere between the state, the population and business, corresponding to the needs of the socio-economic development of Russia. Formally, such a mechanism is provided for in Article 761 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and 281 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. Under his normal work, the main task would be solved: compensation for damage from economic crimes, restoration of social relations in the economy. In addition, this would be achieved with the maximum saving of forces and means of law enforcement agencies. However, in practice, primarily in the preliminary investigation, this legal mechanism is applied little and does not fulfill its purpose. The article explains the causes of this phenomenon and suggests measures to address them. Part of these measures, legal and technical in nature, is associated with the optimization of the existing model for terminating the criminal in connection with compensation for damage. Among them, it is proposed to refuse such conditions for deciding on the termination of a criminal case (prosecution), such as the primacy, degree of public danger of the crime, the fullness of the consent of a person with a suspicion (accusation) against him and others. However, a much greater effect of the analyzed legal mechanism could be achieved if the preliminary investigation was carried out. The establishment of a judicial procedure for bringing charges, forming the basis of criminal liability and exemption from it in connection with compensation for a crime committed in the economic sphere would make the procedure fair and open, and therefore attractive to all participants in a criminal case.
termination of criminal prosecution, redress, economic crimes, reform of the preliminary investigation
1. Alaev R. S. Novye osobennosti pravovogo mehanizma prekrascheniya ugolovnyh del, predusmotrennogo stat'ey 28.1 UPK RF / Aktual'nye problemy rassledovaniya ekonomicheskih prestupleniy : sbornik nauchnyh trudov po itogam mezhvedomstvennogo kruglogo stola (1 marta 2018 goda) / pod red. S.V. Vlasovoy. - Nizhniy Novgorod: Nizhegorodskaya akademiya MVD Rossii, 2018. - S. 6-9.
2. Aleksandrov A. S., Kuhta A. A., Marchuk A. D. Obvinitel'naya vlast'. Ugolovnyy isk. Ugolovnoe presledovanie i ego vidy. Lekciya 7 / Ugolovnyy process. Problemnye lekcii : uchebnik dlya magistrov / pod red. Marficina P. G., Tomina V. T., Zinchenko I. A. - Moskva: Yurayt, 2015. - 799 s.
3. Aleksandrov A. S., Aleksandrova I. A. Sovremennaya ugolovnaya politika obespecheniya ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti putem protivodeystviya prestupnosti v sfere ekonomiki : monografiya. - Moskva: Yurlitinform, 2017. - 608 s.
4. Aleksandrov A. S., Aleksandrova I. A., Vlasova S. V. Teoreticheskaya koncepciya gosudarstvenno-pravovoy organizacii protivodeystviya prestupnosti v 21 veke // Gosudarstvo i pravo. - 2019. - № 9. - S. 75-86.
5. Aleksandrov A. S., Vlasova S. V. Antidogmatika: novoe ponimanie ugolovnogo processa i prava // Rossiyskiy zhurnal pravovyh issledovaniy. - 2019. - № 1. - S. 53-61.
6. Aleksandrov A. S., Andreeva O. I., Zaycev O. A. O perspektivah razvitiya rossiyskogo ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva v usloviyah cifrovizacii // Vestnik Tomsk. gos. un-ta. - 2019. - № 448. - S. 199-207.
7. Kovtun N. N. Specializirovannyy sledstvennyy sud'ya: za i protiv // Rossiyskaya yusticiya. - 2010. - № 9. - S. 41-45.
8. Miller V. Yu. Sovremennoe rossiyskoe zakonotvorchestvo po modernizacii stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela: toptanie na meste // Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy pravovoy akademii. - 2014. - № 1 (1). - S. 192-196.
9. Ryabinina T. K. Neobhodim li rossiyskomu ugolovnomu processu institut sledstvennogo sud'i? // Lex Russica. - 2017. - № 12 (133). - S. 200-213.
10. Smirnova I. G. Transakciya - deystvennoe sredstvo ustraneniya vrednyh posledstviy sovershennyh prestupleniy: byt' li ey v rossiyskom ugolovnom processe? // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. - 2011. - № 10. - S. 14-17.
