Belgorod, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
GRNTI 10.27 Гражданское право
In the article, the authors pay attention to the place and significance of animals in the system of civil rights objects. The article provides a General analysis of legal acts that fix the specifics of the legal regime of animals. The article analyzes the specifics of the legal regime of animals. Special attention is paid to the analysis of the place of animals in the system of civil rights objects. The authors raise the issue of the absence of a unified concept of an animal in the current legislation, and also draw attention to the lack of a unified approach to the classification of animals, which may be of practical importance when applying legal standards in the field under consideration. The authors analyze the features of legal regulation of the involvement of wild animals and animals removed from their natural habitat. The authors conclude that there is currently a fairly logical and consistent legal framework in place for wild animals, but due attention is notpaid to the specifics of the legal regime for animals removed from their natural habitat. The article attempts to determine the types of animals whose legal regime features are provided for in the current legislation. The article indicates that new regulatory legal acts are currently being adopted on the treatment of animals, in particular, the concept of potentially dangerous dogs has been introduced into legal circulation.
animals, legal regime, objects of civil rights, source of increased danger
1. Anisimov A. P., Mohov A. A., Kopylov D. E. Pravovoy rezhim zhivotnyh kak ob'ekta grazhdanskih i inyh pravootnosheniy // Sovremennoe pravo. - 2007. - № 4. - S. 93-98.
2. Gasnikov K. D. Zhivotnye kak ob'ekty grazhdanskih prav // Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika. - 2002. - № 12. - S. 17-19.
3. Puzevich A. N. Ponyatie i priznaki zhivotnyh kak ob'ekta grazhdanskih prav // Yuridicheskaya nauka. - 2011. - № 4. - S. 77-78.
4. Mohov A. A., Kopylov D. E. Psovye kak ob'ekty grazhdanskih prav // Yuridicheskiy mir. - 2006. - № 12. - S. 25-37.
5. Nikolyukin S. V., Utkina I. O. Osobennosti vozniknoveniya i prekrascheniya prava sobstvennosti na beznadzornyh i beshozyaynyh zhivotnyh: kollizii grazhdanskogo zakonodatel'stva // Yurist. - 2009. - № 6. - S. 15-24.
6. Zaharov D. E. K voprosu o prave sobstvennosti na zhivotnyy mir // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. - 2010. - № 3. - S. 130-137.
7. Evseev E. F. O sootnoshenii ponyatiy «zhivotnoe» i «vesch'» v grazhdanskom prave // Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika. - 2009. - № 2. - S. 16-20.
8. Mikryukov V. A. Zhivotnye - osobyy ob'ekt bremeni sobstvennosti // Yuridicheskiy mir. - 2016. - № 5. - S. 32-35.
9. Minina E. L. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya obrascheniya s zhivotnymi // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. - 2014. - № 12. - S. 80-88.
10. Loginova E. V., Polovinko K. V. Zhivotnye kak osobyy ob'ekt sobstvennosti grazhdanskogo prava Rossii / Social'no-gumanitarnye problemy sovremennosti : sbornik nauchnyh trudov po materialam mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. - Belgorod: OOO «Agentstvo perspektivnyh nauchnyh issledovaniy» , 2017. - S. 75-77.
