Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
Examines the existing in Russia ways to protect the rights and legitimate interests of minors in civil and family law. The practice of applying the norms of modern civil and family law when juveniles exercise their property rights is analyzed. We consider the conditions under which the protection if the rights of minors is possible both within the framework of protection and protection of property, inheritance rights of the child, rights to alimony obligations. The rights of the child to the occupied premises are considered. Various interpretations of the legal regime of property acquired for a child are investigated. Measures aimed at exercising proper control over the procedure for spending alimony of parents with whom a minor child lives are determined. The features of the legal regulation of entrepreneurial activity with the participation of minors are examined, and the issues of legal capacity and legal capacity of a minor who is an individual entrepreneur are studied. The problems and controversial moments that arise in practice when carrying out entrepreneurial activities of minors who do not have full legal capacity are identified. Discusses discussion questions regarding the age at which a citizen has the opportunity to conduct business. In this regard, a number of changes and amendments to the legislation are proposed.

Keywords:
property rights of minors, civil and family law, judicial protection, practice of applying civil and family law. entrepreneurial activity of minors, legal capacity, recognition of full legal capacity, the body of guardianship and guardianship
Text
Publication text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Bukshina S. V. Pravosub'ektnost' nesovershennoletnih: neobhodimost' reformirovaniya grazhdanskogo zakonodatel'stva // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. - 2015. - № 5. - S. 64-68.

2. Dzhabua I. V. Predprinimatel'skaya deyatel'nost' nesovershennoletnih // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. - 2017. - № 4. - S. 55-59.

3. Shilovskaya A. L. Povyshenie effektivnosti osuschestvleniya roditel'skih prav i obyazannostey s pomosch'yu soglasheniya ob uplate alimentov // Ispolnitel'noe pravo. - 2015. - № 2. - S. 25-30.

4. Efimova D. G. Dogovory bankovskogo vklada i bankovskogo scheta. - Moskva: Prospekt, 2018. - 432 s.

5. Ilyuhin A. V. Usloviya i poryadok ob'yavleniya nesovershennoletnih polnost'yu deesposobnymi (emansipacii) // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. - 2013. - № 7. - S. 82 - 89.

6. Kazihanova S. S., Galahtin M. G. Predprinimatel'skaya deyatel'nost' nesovershennoletnih // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. - 2016. - № 9 (70). - S. 81-85.

7. Serebryakova A. A. Zaschita imuschestvennyh prav detey // Istoricheskaya i social'no-obrazovatel'naya mysl'. - 2017. - T. 9. - № 2/1. - S. 105-110.

8. Stankevich G. V. Predprinimatel'skaya pravosub'ektnost' nesovershennoletnego individual'nogo predprinimatelya // Gumanitarnye i yuridicheskie issledovaniya. - 2014. - № 6. - S. 107-110.

9. Tkacheva O. S. Imuschestvennye prava nesovershennoletnego (rebenka) kak ponyatie grazhdanskogo i semeynogo prava // Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba i kadry. - 2016. - № 4. - S. 73.

10. Yaroshenko K. B. Grazhdanskiy kodeks i prava grazhdanina: sovershenstvovanie zakonodatel'stva // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. - 2012. - № 5. - S. 104-110.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?