from 01.01.2009 to 01.01.2019
Sankt-Peterburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
from 01.01.1996 to 01.01.2019
Russian Federation
UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
GRNTI 10.27 Гражданское право
Entering into the world economic system required the Russian economy to transform the administrative model of management and certain efforts to introduce and use economic classifications used by the countries of the world in their daily activities. First of all, the introduction of new terms into modern economic activity is associated with the introduction in our country of the system of national accounts with all related classifiers. In statistical materials and in scientific circulation, such terms as the type of economic activity and the economic sector are now used. These economic terms are enshrined in regulatory legal acts. However, in the media, regulatory legal documents, and in a number of economic publications, either outdated economic terms are used to refer to the industry, or the term, the economic sector, is incorrectly interpreted. The article proposes to draw the attention of lawyers and economists to the correct application of economic terms. The presented material also draws attention to the unjustifiably wide use of the term «audit» in modern domestic legal and economic literature and in regulatory legal documents.
control, state financial control, audit, branch of economy, type of economic activity, sector of economy
1. Kuzin N. N., Shubnikov Yu. B., Shkvarok V. M. Reinzhiniring proizvodstva v sisteme obespecheniya ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti predpriyatiya: monografiya. - Sankt-Peterburg: Lema, 2014. - 280 s.
2. Shkvarok V. M., Shumilin O. V. Ponyatie megapolisa v kontekste ukrupneniya sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federacii // Mir ekonomiki i prava. - 2015. -№ 7. - S. 35-41.
3. Zobova L. L., Muhamedieva S. A. O korrektnosti ispol'zovaniya ekonomicheskih terminov v ekonomicheskih issledovaniyah // Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. - 2010. - № 2. - S. 155-158.
4. Abdulla V. L. Osobennosti znacheniya i upotrebleniya ekonomicheskih terminov v tekstah SMI // Vestnik RUDN. Seriya «Teoriya yazyka. Semiotika. Semantika». - 2014. - № 4. - S. 65-71.
5. Shumilin O. V., Gladkova S. B. Problemy primeneniya ponyatiya «vidy ekonomicheskoy deyatel'nosti» v transformiruyuschemsya nauchnom prostranstve i normativnyh dokumentah, formiruyuschih obespechenie ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti v Rossiyskoy Federacii // Obrazovanie. Nauka. Nauchnye kadry. - 2013. - № 5. - C. 122-125.
6. Litvinenko A. N. Ekonomicheskaya i nacional'naya bezopasnost': problemy sootneseniya ponyatiy // Nauchno-tehnicheskie vedomosti Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo politehnicheskogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie nauki. - 2013. - № 3 (173). - S. 9-15.
7. Shumilin O. V. Ob okonchanii perehodnogo perehoda razvitiya ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Federacii / Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost' lichnosti, obschestva, gosudarstva: problemy i puti obespecheniya : materialy ezhegodnoy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii : v 2 t. - T. 1. - Sankt-Peterburg: Izd-vo SPb un-ta MVD Rossii, 2016. - S. 311-314.
8. Filippovskaya O. V. Analiz organizacii vneshnego i vnutrennego kontrolya kachestva raboty auditorskih organizaciy i auditorov // Auditor. - 2014. - № 1. - S. 23-31.
9. Fedotov A. F. Ponyatie gosudarstvennogo audita // Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. - 2015. - № 2-2 (62). - S. 215-219.
