employee from 01.01.2011 to 01.01.2026
g. Sankt-Peterburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
UDC 159.9.072
Introduction. The self-organisation of employees in the internal affairs bodies is a valuable personal quality that ensures the reliability of the individual in professional activities, allowing for systematic achievement of goals through mechanisms of goalsetting, self-control, self-assessment, and self-regulation. The significance of selforganisation increases in conditions of uncertainty and complexity, which demand proactive structuring of one’s activities and effective activation of self-development potential. Aim of the study: To identify the psychological features of the personalities of employees in the internal affairs bodies depending on the level of self-organisation. Methods. The empirical study employed general scientific methods of analysis, psychodiagnostic methods, and mathematical statistical methods. The study sample comprised employees of the territorial internal affairs bodies of the Northwestern Federal District (n = 130). During the study, the sample was divided into two groups based on indicators of high and low levels of self-organisation, with the reliability of differences at p ≤ 0.001. Results. The study established values corresponding to the average level of selforganisation among internal affairs employees, reflecting the sufficiency of components such as goal-orientedness and planning, as well as the ability to concentrate on the goals and tasks of their activities among all representatives of the sample. Differences between groups with higher and lower levels of self-organisation (at p ≤ 0.001) were identified in the ability to manage one's own time when organising activities, using experience in structuring activities, goal-directedness, and self-organisation in general. Employees with higher levels demonstrated high levels of focus on planned tasks and goals, a commitment to fulfilling obligations, and adherence to scheduled times for performance. Their professional self-attitude was characterised by a positive regard for themselves as significant subjects of activity, stability in professional and meaningful orientation, which enhances subjective aspirations for personal growth and constructive changes in personality traits. In contrast, those with low levels of self-organisation exhibited low levels of self-assessment regarding personal growth, experiences of self-blame in their profession, self-deprecation in their work, and a tendency to experience feelings of guilt, anger, dissatisfaction, and frustration regarding their perceived lack of success and self-doubt.
self-organisation, self-regulation, employees of internal affairs bodies, goal-setting, self-control, professional self-attitude
1. Dugina Yu. V. Samoorganizaciya lichnosti // Sovremennye nauchnye issledovaniya i innovacii : [elektronnoe izdanie]. 2024. № 4. URL: https://web.snauka.ru/issues/2024/04/101869 (data obrascheniya: 10.01.2026).
2. Kostromina S. N. Strukturno-funkcional'naya model' samoorganizacii deyatel'nosti // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. 2010. № 4 (12). S. 153–160.
3. Mandrikova E. Yu. Razrabotka oprosnika samoorganizacii deyatel'nosti (OSD) // Psihologicheskaya diagnostika. 2010. № 2. S. 87–111.
4. Konopkin O. A. Obschaya sposobnost' k samoregulyacii kak faktor sub'ektnogo razvitiya // Voprosy psihologii. 2004. № 2. S. 128–135.
5. Morosanova V. I. Razvitie idey O. A. Konopkina v sovremennyh issledovaniyah osoznannoy samoregulyacii v kontekste aktual'nyh zadach obrazovaniya / Psihologiya samoregulyacii v kontekste aktual'nyh zadach obrazovaniya (k 90-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya O. A. Konopkina) : sbornik statey po materialam vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferencii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem, g. Moskva, 27–28 aprelya 2021 g. Moskva : Psihologicheskiy institut Rossiyskoy akademii obrazovaniya, 2021. S. 11–18.
6. Karpinskiy K. V., Kolyshko A. M. Professional'noe samootnoshenie lichnosti i metodika ego psihologicheskoy diagnostiki : monografiya. Grodno: Grodnenskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 2010. 140 s.
7. Demkina E. V., Anisimov Yu. S. Retrospektivnyy analiz vzglyadov otechestvennyh i zarubezhnyh uchenyh na klassifikaciyu ponyatiy «Samoobrazovanie» i «Samoorganizaciya» // Vestnik Adygeyskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 3: Pedagogika i psihologiya. 2015. № 3 (162). S. 44–52.
8. Nos E. Yu. Sposobnost' k samoorganizacii deyatel'nosti kak kriteriy lichnostnogo potenciala i uslovie dostizheniya psihologicheskogo blagopoluchiya // Sibirskiy psihologicheskiy zhurnal. 2009. № 34. S. 106–108.
9. Trofimova Yu. V. Samoorganizaciya i dominiruyuschee emocional'noe sostoyanie kursantov vuza MVD Rossii // Sociologiya v sovremennom mire: nauka, obrazovanie, tvorchestvo. 2017. № 9–1. S. 185–188.
10. Ivanov E. Yu. Formirovanie navykov samoorganizacii u kursantov pervogo kursa obrazovatel'nyh organizaciy MVD Rossii s pomosch'yu nastavnichestva // Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye i obschestvennye nauki. 2025. T. 9, № 1. S. 62–69. https://doi.org/10.21603/2542-1840-2025-9-1-62-69
11. Mar'in M. I., Teregulova O. A. Faktory, vliyayuschie na formirovanie optimal'nyh emocional'nyh sostoyaniy sotrudnikov organov vnutrennih del Rossiyskoy Federacii // Psihologiya i pravo. 2024. T. 14, № 2. C. 145–157. https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2024140211
12. Schekina S. O., Filatova E. A. Osobennosti samoorganizacii deyatel'nosti sotrudnikov MVD s raznym urovnem tolerantnosti k neopredelennosti // Forum molodyh uchenyh. 2018. № 1 (18). S. 1334–1340.
13. Rogachev V. A., Konopleva I. N. Tolerantnost' k neopredelennosti i vybor koping-strategiy u sotrudnikov pravoohranitel'nyh organov // Psihologiya i pravo. 2017. № 4 (7). S. 106–126. https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2017070409
14. White D. R., Kyle M. J., Schafer J. Police officer self-legitimacy: the role of organizational fit // Policing: An International Journal. 2020. Vol. 43, № 6. P. 993–1006. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-03-2020-0035
15. Shevelenkova T. D., Fesenko T. P. Psihologicheskoe blagopoluchie lichnosti // Psihologicheskaya diagnostika. 2005. № 3. S. 95–121.
16. Kolyshko A. M., Karpinskiy K. V. Koncepciya i oprosnik professional'nogo samootnosheniya: novye empiricheskie i psihometricheskie rezul'taty // Vestnik Grodnenskogo universiteta im. Ya. Kupaly. Seriya 3 «Filosofiya. Pedagogika. Psihologiya». 2022. T. 12, № 3. S. 150–166.
17. Rubinshteyn S. L. Chelovek i mir : monografiya. Sankt-Peterburg : Piter, 2003. 512 s.
18. Morosanova V. I. Psihologiya osoznannoy samoregulyacii: ot istokov k sovremennym issledovaniyam // Teoreticheskaya i eksperimental'naya psihologiya. 2022. T. 15, № 3. S. 57–83. https://doi.org/10.24412/2073-0861-2022-3-57-82
