employee
Kerch, Simferopol, Russian Federation
UDC 338.28
Introduction. The tax system plays a key role in maintaining the sustainable functioning of the budgetary system and ensuring the economic security of the state. Its effectiveness is determined by the principles of transparency and efficiency, the effective implementation of which makes it possible to successfully counteract the growth of the shadow economy and tax evasion. At the same time, the digitalisation of the economic space has a positive impact on tax compliance, as it reduces administrative costs, but it also creates new opportunities and schemes for tax evasion. Methods. The research is based on the methods of analysis and synthesis for assessing the impact of digital technology implementation on tax administration efficiency, as well as the methods of comparative and factor analysis for evaluating the development of advanced technologies. Data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development was used as empirical material. Results. The results of the analysis revealed that the implementation of information and analytical systems involving big data and artificial intelligence accounting technologies not only enables the prompt recording of financial flows and tax liabilities of each economic entity, but also makes it possible to identify violations of legislation in real time. Automation of control processes: reduces the chance of human error and cuts down on corruption among tax officials; encourages voluntary compliance with tax laws; lowers the incentive to move into the shadow economy by increasing the possibility of detecting tax evasion. The active introduction of digital technologies into the tax administration system serves as a powerful tool for counteracting the growth of the shadow economy. A comprehensive approach, including automated accounting, financial monitoring, remote services and international cooperation, can provide significant support to regulatory authorities in ensuring the sustainable development of the budget and tax system.
shadow economy, tax administration, big data, artificial intelligence, tax control
1. Chujkov, Andrey S., and Ekaterina A. Krichevec. 2022. “Vliyanie cifrovogo rublya na effektivnost' protivodejstviya otmyvaniyu dohodov i finansirovaniyu terrorizma.” [“The impact of the digital ruble on the effectiveness of countering money laundering and terrorist financing”] (In Russ.) Drukerovskij vestnik [The Drucker Bulletin] 45, no. 1 (February):269–78. https://doi.org/0.17213/2312-6469-2022-1-269-278
2. De Carvalho, Afonso N. M., [et al.]. 2023. “The effects of the national simple tax regime on the small businesses revenue and tax payment in the Ceará state – Brazil.” Observatório de la economía latinoamericana 21, no. 11 (November): 22944–65. https://doi.org/10.55905/oelv21n11-234
3. Floridi, Andrea, Binyam A. Demena, and Natascha Wagner. 2021. “The Bright Side of Formalization Policies! Metaanalysis of the Benefits of Policy-induced Versus Self-induced Formalization.” Applied Economics Letters 28, no. 20 (January):1807–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1870919
4. Jessen, Jonas, and Jochen Kluve. 2021. “The effectiveness of interventions to reduce informality in low-and middleincome countries.” World Development 138, no. 1 (February):105256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105256
5. Musagaliev, Ajiniyaz Ju., [et al.]. 2024. “Procedure for Implementing Tax Control in Tax Risk Management and Tax Audits.” Partners Universal 2, no. 1 (February):76–83. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1064351
6. Horodnic, Ioana A., and Colin C. Williams. 2019. “Tackling undeclared work in the European Union: beyond the rational economic actor approach.” Policy studies 43, no. 1 (July):21–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2019.1649384
7. Ioan, Pop. 2011. “Tax control-Prevention and control of tax evasion.” Annals of faculty of economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics 1, no. 2 (December):375–80.
8. Mațcu, Mara [et al.]. 2023. “Undeclared activities on digital labour platforms: An exploratory study.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 43, no. 1 (September):740–55. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-07-2022-0186
9. OECD. 2024. Tax Administration 2024: Comparative Information on OECD and Other Advanced and Emerging Economies 205. Paris : OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/2d5fba9c-en
10. OECD. 2021. “Tax and Fiscal Policies After the COVID-19 Crisis.” OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19) 39. Paris : OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5a8f24c3-en
11. Owen, Ruth. 2025. “The Principles of Good Tax Administration.” Australian Tax Review 54, no. 1 (February):4–10. https://doi.org/10.54648/ECTA2018005
12. Pomeranz, Dina D. 2015. “No taxation without information: Deterrence and self-enforcement in the value added tax.” American Economic Review 105, no. 8 (January):2539–69. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20130393
13. Schneider, Friedrich, Konrad Raczkowski, and Bogdan Mróz. 2015. “Shadow economy and tax evasion in the EU.” Journal of Money Laundering Control 18, no. 1 (January):34–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-09-2014-0027
14. Sour, Laura, and Scarlet Arcos. 2024. “Comparative Analysis of Stochastic Frontier Efficiency in Payroll and Accommodation Tax Collection in Mexico (2010–2020).” Apuntes del Cenes 43, no. 78 (December):181–206. https: //doi.org/10.19053/uptc.01203053.v43.n78.2024.17244
15. Torgler, Benno, and Friedrich Schneider. 2009. “The impact of tax morale and institutional quality on the shadow economy.” Journal of Economic Psychology 30, no. 2 (April):228–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2008.08.004
16. Marusic, Andreja. [et al.]. “Re-thinking the Approach to Informal Businesses : Typologies, Evidence and Future Exploration.” Finance, Competitiveness and Innovation Insight 24. USA, Washington, DC : World Bank Group. 2020 (November). https://doi.org/10.1596/34814
