The problem of defining and interpreting the concept of ‘secret protection’ in operative-investigative activities

Andrei Tambovtsev

doi:10.35750/2071-8284-2025-2-211-217

VAK Russia 5.1.4 UDC 351.745.7

2 more Collapse

THE PROBLEM OF DEFINING AND INTERPRETING THE CONCEPT OF ‘SECRET PROTECTION’ IN OPERATIVE-INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES The problem of defining and interpreting the concept of ‘secret protection’ in operative-investigative activities

АА Аа

Published in Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia · Pages 211–217 · Rubric: CRIMINAL LAW SCIENCES

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2025-2-211-217

Received: 04.02.2025 Accepted: 20.06.2025 Published: 26.06.2025 Language of publication: RUS

Authors

Andrei Tambovtsev

ORCID

Andrei Tambovtsev

Academic degree: doctor of jurisprudence sciences

Science rang: docent

Saint Petersburg University of the MIA of Russia docent · kafedra operativno-razysknoy deyatel'nosti v organah vnutrennih del · Russian Federation

ORCID

ABSTRACT

Introduction. Operative-investigative activities are inherently linked to confidential information, which may contain official secrets and must be reliably protected from unauthorised disclosure. Law enforcement practice has developed effective methods of secret protection of operative-investigative subjects, comprising a combination of regulatory, procedural, and covert-conspiratorial behaviour of keepers and users of this secret. However, there is no consensus on the interpretation of the concept of ‘secret protection’ among scholars and practitioners. This fact naturally leads to varying approaches in its implementation. The author attempts to analyse contemporary views of scholars and practitioners on the concept of ‘secret protection’ within the framework of his own study of the covert operations paradigm in operative-investigative activities. Methods. The study employed comparative legal and content analysis of regulatory legal acts governing the protection of official secrets; general scientific dialectical and formal-logical methods in examining theoretical provisions defining the categorical and conceptual framework of the covert operations paradigm in operative-investigative activities and the foundations of practical secret protection. These methods helped identify issues in the legal regulation of official secret protection in the field of operativeinvestigative activities. Results. Based on the analysis of Russian legislation and numerous scientific studies, the author concludes that current Russian laws regulating the handling and protection of official secrets contain conflicting norms leading to ambiguous interpretation, thus requiring correction. The author presents well-reasoned perspectives on certain concepts used in the Official Secrets Act and methods of secret protection.

KEYWORDS

operative-investigative activities, secret, official secret, private theory of covertness, covertness in operative-investigative activities, protection of undercover operations, principle of covert operations, secrecy

Text

Text (PDF)

Read Download

1. Truhachev V. V. Kriminalisticheskiy analiz sokrytiya prestupnoy deyatel'nosti : monografiya. Voronezh : Voronezhskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 2000. 224 s.

2. Prisekin A. V. Klassifikaciya sposobov sokrytiya prestupleniy // Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika. 2011. № 3 (75). S. 115–119.

3. McCornack S. A. Information Manipulation Theory // Communication monographs. 1992. Vol. 59. R. 1–16.

4. McCornack S. A. Interpersonal Communication and You : An Introduction. Bedford, St. Martin’s; 2014. 336 p.

5. McCornack S. A., Morrison K. The Essential Guide to Interpersonal Communication. 3rd edition. Bedford, St. Martin’s, 2017. 80 p.

6. Zharov S. N. Stanovlenie rezhima sekretnosti v Rossiyskom gosudarstve // Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedeniy. Pravovedenie. 2007. № 5 (274). S. 171–183.

7. Klimenko O. P., Slobodyanik A. Yu., Shevchik D. V. Istoriya razvitiya deloproizvodstva v Rossiyskoy Federacii / Integraciya Respubliki Krym v sistemu ekonomicheskih svyazey Rossiyskoy Federacii: teoriya i praktika upravleniya : materialy HII mezhregional'noy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem, g. Simferopol', 28 oktyabrya 2016 g. Simferopol' : Diaypi, 2016. S. 267–268.

8. Shmatov V. M., Churikova N. A. Istoriya deloproizvodstva v Rossii / Aktual'nye voprosy teorii i praktiki v deyatel'nosti podrazdeleniy policii po ohrane obschestvennogo poryadka i inyh sluzhb OVD : materialy I Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, g. Volgograd, 4 marta 2016 g. Astrahan' : Nauchnyy centr «Olimp», 2016. S. 55–63.

9. Scherbatyh Yu. V. Psihologiya lzhi i obmana : metody iskazheniya deystvitel'nosti, strategiya izbeganiya obmana, sposoby vyyavleniya pravdy. Izd. 2-e, pererab. i dop. Rostov-na-Donu : Feniks, 2011. 284 s.

10. Obrazcov V. A., Bertovskaya N. L. Ugolovno-relevantnoe dezinformirovanie: ponyatie i kriterii dopustimosti // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2010. № 2. S. 112–117.

11. Elisov P. P. Ispol'zovanie operativnoy dezinformacii i inscenirovki pri provedenii operativno-rozysknyh meropriyatiy po vyyavleniyu i dokumentirovaniyu korrupcionnyh prestupleniy: mnenie analitika // Nauchnyy portal MVD Rossii. 2015. № 2 (30). S. 54–60.

12. Omelin V. N. Sootnoshenie operativno-rozysknyh meropriyatiy i inyh smezhnyh operativno-rozysknyh deystviy // Ugolovno-ispolnitel'naya sistema: pravo, ekonomika, upravlenie. 2016. № 6. S. 9–12.

13. Dubonosov E. S. Dezinformaciya kriminal'noy sredy pri osuschestvlenii operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti // Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki. 2021. № 2. S. 27–33; https://doi.org/10.24412/2071-6184-2021-2-27-33.

14. Nelyubin R. V., Shevchenko S. V., Zhabkin A. S. Dezinformaciya kak oruzhie v informacionnoy voyne // Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2022. № 4 (167). S. 402–403.

15. Tambovcev A. I., Pavlichenko N. V. Sodeystvie grazhdan pravoohranitel'nym organam kak social'no-pravovoy fenomen : monografiya. Moskva : Prospekt, 2022. 344 s.

16. Tambovcev A. I., Pavlichenko N. V. Operativno-rozysknoy instrumentariy : monografiya. Moskva : Prospekt, 2024. 304 s.

17. Obrazcov V. A., Andreev S. V., Bertovskiy L. V. Ispol'zovanie dezinformacii pri vyyavlenii i rassledovanii prestupleniy // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2005. № 8. S. 2–6.

18. Altuhova L. A., Shahov N. G., Didrih I. V., Sevenyuk V. V. Model' rasprostraneniya dezinformacii / Tehnika i bezopasnost' ob'ektov ugolovno-ispolnitel'noy sistemy : sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, g. Voronezh, 23–24 maya 2018 g. Voronezh : Nauchnaya kniga, 2018. S. 206–208.

19. Glazunova I. V., Shirkin N. A. Kriminalisticheskaya dezinformaciya kak element dopustimyh sredstv vyyavleniya i raskrytiya prestupleniy // Vestnik Vserossiyskogo instituta povysheniya kvalifikacii sotrudnikov Ministerstva vnutrennih del Rossiyskoy Federacii. 2018. № 1 (45). S. 40–43.

20. Prohvatilov V. V. Teoriya dezinformacii. nauchnye osnovy social'nogo manipulirovaniya // Informacionnye voyny. 2021. № 4 (60). S. 18–24.

21. Problemy teorii i praktiki operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti : materialy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii / pod red. K. K. Goryainova, I. A. Klimova. Moskva : Vserossiyskiy nauchno-issledovatel'skiy institut MVD Rossii, 2002. 239 s.

22. Pavlichenko N. V., Samodelkin A. S. Neglasnost' v operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii, 2012. № 3. S. 88–93.

GOST

Tambovtsev A. I. The problem of defining and interpreting the concept of ‘secret protection’ in operative-investigative activities // Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2025. no. 2. pp. 211-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2025-2-211-217. (Date of access 18.09.2026).

MLA

Andrei Tambovtsev. "The problem of defining and interpreting the concept of ‘secret protection’ in operative-investigative activities." Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia 2025.2 (2025): 211-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2025-2-211-217.

APA

Tambovtsev A. I. (2025). The problem of defining and interpreting the concept of ‘secret protection’ in operative-investigative activities. Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2025(2), 211-217. https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2025-2-211-217

Chicago

Andrei Tambovtsev. "The problem of defining and interpreting the concept of ‘secret protection’ in operative-investigative activities." Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia 2025, no. 2 (2025): 211-217. https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2025-2-211-217.

WIKI

{{cite journal | author = Tambovtsev A. I. | title = The problem of defining and interpreting the concept of ‘secret protection’ in operative-investigative activities | journal = Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia | year = 2025 | volume = 2025 | issue = 2 | pages = 211-217 | doi = 10.35750/2071-8284-2025-2-211-217 }}

Copy

Export: BibTeX EndNote RefMan RusMARC

THE PROBLEM OF DEFINING AND INTERPRETING THE CONCEPT OF ‘SECRET PROTECTION’ IN OPERATIVE-INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES The problem of defining and interpreting the concept of ‘secret protection’ in operative-investigative activities

Confirmation