Locus of control and teachers’ perceptions of adolescents’ involvement in aggression

Artur Rean; Ekaterina Avdeeva; Ivan A. Konovalov

doi:10.35750/2071-8284-2024-2-323-334

VAK Russia 5.3.9 UDC 159.9.07 CSCSTI 15.00

3 more Collapse

LOCUS OF CONTROL AND TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS OF ADOLESCENTS’ INVOLVEMENT IN AGGRESSION Locus of control and teachers’ perceptions of adolescents’ involvement in aggression

АА Аа

Published in Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia · Volume 2024, Issue 2 · Pages 323–334 · Rubric: FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHOLOGY OF SAFETY

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2024-2-323-334

Received: 04.03.2024 Accepted: 10.04.2024 Published: 28.06.2024 Language of publication: RUS

Authors

Artur Rean

ORCID Scopus ResearcherID SPIN

Ekaterina Avdeeva

ORCID

Ivan A. Konovalov

ORCID

Artur Rean

Academic degree: doctor of pedagogical sciences

Science rang: academician author.academy_titles.33 ; professor

Moscow Pedagogical State University Russian Federation

ORCID Scopus ResearcherID SPIN

Ekaterina Avdeeva

Moscow Pedagogical State University Russian Federation

ORCID

Ivan A. Konovalov

Academic degree: candidate of psychological sciences

Moscow Pedagogical State University Russian Federation

ORCID

ABSTRACT

Relevance. The article is devoted to the problem of teachers’ evaluation of risk indicators of aggressive behavior involvement among adolescents. The paper examines the problem of the dependence of the involvement risk assessment on the personal characteristics of the teacher, especially, locus of control. Aim. To assess the relationship between the level of the teacher’s locus of control and their perception of the markers of victimization of adolescents. Materials and Methods. The sample consisted of 4.453 school teachers (94 % are female). The participants are residents of seven regions of the Russian Federation. The method “Level of Subjective Control” (“LSC”) by E. F. Bazhin, E. A. Golynkina, A. M. Etkind was used. To assess teachers’ perceptions of victimization markers, the authors analyzed the answers to the question “How do you usually recognize that the child is suffering aggression?” The question is included in the standardized questionnaire of the Center for Socialization, Family and Prevention of Antisocial Behavior Research of the Moscow State Pedagogical University. Results. The data analysis revealed that teachers who marked the options proposed in the questionnaire as the markers of adolescent victimization have statistically significantly higher scores (higher absolute values) on various subjective locus control scales. Conclusion. Teachers who tend to internality have significantly higher scores on various markers of victimization as indicators of adolescents’ involvement in aggressive behavior.

KEYWORDS

social perception, locus of control, teachers, aggression, risk indicators

Funding

The study was carried out within the framework of the topic "Interaction between family and school as a factor in preventing destructive behavior of young people"

Text

Text (PDF)

Read Download

1. Bochaver A. A. Travlya v detskom kollektive: ustanovki i vozmozhnosti uchiteley // Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovaniye psyedu.ru : setevoy zhurnal. – 2014. – T. 6. – № 1. – S. 47–55. – URL: http://psyedu.ru/journal/2014/1/Bochaver.phtml data obrashcheniya: 09.11.2022).

2. Novikova M. A., Rean A. A. Vliyaniye shkol’nogo klimata na vozniknoveniye travli: otechestvennyy i zarubezhnyy opyt issledovaniya // Voprosy obrazovaniya. – 2019. – №. 2. – S. 78–97; https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2019-2-78-97.

3. Rean A. A. Profilaktika agressii i asotsial’nosti nesovershennoletnikh // Natsional’nyy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal. – 2018. – №. 2 (30). – S. 3–12; https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2018.0201.

4. Rean A. A., Kosheleva Ye. S. Rol’ koping-strategiy i PPI v protsesse vzaimodeystviya uchiteley s agressivnymi podrostkami // Psikhologiya i pedagogika sluzhebnoy deyatel’nosti. – 2021. – №. 3. – S. 78–86; https://doi.org/10.24412/2658-638X-2021-3-78-86.

5. Rean A. A., Kosheleva Ye. S. Agressiya i asotsial’noye povedeniye podrostkov v soznanii pedagogov // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. – 2021. – №. 4. – S. 305–312; https://doi.org/10.24412/2073-0454-2021-4-305-312.

6. Yoon J., Sulkowski M. L., Bauman S. A. Teachers’ responses to bullying incidents: Effects of teacher characteristics and contexts //Journal of school violence. – 2016. – Vol. 15. – No. 1. – P. 91–113; https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.963592.

7. Sobkin V. S., Fomichenko A. S. Ponimaniye uchitelyami prichin proyavleniya agressii uchashchikhsya k pedagogu / Sotsiologiya obrazovaniya. Trudy po sotsiologii obrazovaniya sbornike statey / pod redaktsiyey V. S. Sobkina. – Moskva: Federal’noye gosudarstvennoye nauchnoye uchrezhdeniye «Institut sotsiologii obrazovaniya» Rossiyskoy akademii obrazovaniya, 2012. – T. XVI. – Vyp. XXVIII. – S. 137–147. Ser.: Sotsiokul’turnyye problemy sovremennogo obrazovaniya.

8. Rean A. A., Kosheleva Ye. S. Svyaz’ predstavleniy pedagogov o vozrastnykh osobennostyakh agressii podrostkov so sposobami ikh reagirovaniya na agressivno-konfliktnoye povedeniye uchashchikhsya // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. – 2022. – №. 6. – S. 312–319; https://doi.org/10.24412/2073-0454-2022-6-312-319.

9. Fomichenko A. S. Predstavleniya uchiteley o prichinakh agressivnogo povedeniya uchashchikhsya raznykh klassov obshcheobrazovatel’noy shkoly //Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo. – 2013. – T. 4. – №. 2. – S. 81–93.

10. Volkova Ye. N., Tsvetkova L. A., Volkova I. V. Metodologicheskiye osnovaniya dlya razrabotki programm profilaktiki podrostkovogo bullinga //Sibirskiy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal. – 2019. – №. 74. – S. 88–100; https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/74/5.

11. Rean A. A., Kosheleva Ye. S. Svyaz’ predstavleniy pedagogov o polovykh osobennostyakh agressii podrostkov so sposobami ikh reagirovaniya na agressivno-konfliktnoye povedeniye uchashchikhsya// Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. – 2022. – №. 5. – S. 366–376; https://doi.org/10.24412/2073-0454-2022-5-366-376.

12. Rotter J. B. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement // Psychological monographs: General and Applied. – 1966. – Vol. 80. – No. 1. – P. 1–28; https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976.

13. Pantileyev C. R. Metody izmereniya lokusa kontrolya / Obshchaya psikhodiagnostika : osnovy psikhodiagnostiki, nemedlennoy psikhoterapii i psikhologicheskogo konsul’tirovaniya : uchebnoye posobiye / A. A. Bodalev [i dr.] ; pod red. A. A. Bodaleva, V. V. Stolina. – Moskva: Izdatel’stvo MGU, 1987. – S. 278–285.

14. Rusbandi N., Usman O. Effect of Self Effication, Locus of Control, and Emotional Intelligence on Procrastination // SSRN : Electronic Journal : [Online]; https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3646005. – URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3646005 (data obrashcheniya: 09.11.2022).

15. Kim N. R., Lee K. H. The effect of Internal Locus of Control on Career Adaptability: The Mediating Role of Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy and Occupational Engagement // Journal of Employment Counseling. – No 55 (1). P. 2–15; https://doi.org/10.1002/joec.12069.

16. Türk-Kurtça T., Kocatürk M. The Role of Childhood Traumas, Emotional Self-Efficacy and Internal-External Locus of Control in Predicting Psychological Resilience // International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies. – 2020. – Vol. 8. – No 3. – P. 105–115; https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.8n.3p.105.

17. Muzdybayev K. Psikhologiya otvetstvennosti : monografiya / pod red. V. Ye. Semenova. – Leningrad: Nauka, 1983. – 264 s.

18. Rean A. A. Psikhologiya lichnosti. –Sankt-Peterburg: Piter, 2016. – 286 s.

19. Pesudo D., Anakonda C. The effect of ethical climate and locus of control toward whistleblowing intention // Jurnal AKSI (Akuntansi dan Sistem Informasi). – 2022. – Vol. 7. – No 1. – P. 52–61; https://doi.org/10.32486/aksi.v7i1.248.

20. Camadan F., Sari S. V. Forgiveness, Locus of Control, and Perfectionism: A Mixed Method Study // International Journal of Progressive Education. – 2021. – T. 17. – №. 1. – S. 210–231. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2021.329.14.

21. Strong S. L., Gore J. S. The mediating role of locus of control between social resource stability and psychological well‐being // Journal of applied social psychology. – 2020. – Vol. 50. – Issue 8. – P. 464–475; https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12674.

22. Padmanabhan S. The impact of locus of control on workplace stress and job satisfaction: A pilot study on private-sector employees // Current Research in Behavioral Sciences : [Online]. – 2021. – T. 2. – C. 100026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbeha.2021.100026.

23. Levy M., Gumpel T. P. Self-efficacy and external locus of control as predictors of participant roles in relational aggression // Journal of interpersonal violence. – 2022. – Vol. 37. – No 5–6. – P. 3015–3040; https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605209437.

24. Zeyin Y., Long S., Gaoxiao R. Effects of safe driving climate among friends on prosocial and aggressive driving behaviors of young drivers: The moderating role of traffic locus of control // Journal of safety research. – 2022. – Vol. 81. – P. 297–304; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2022.03.006.

25. Rean A. A., Baranov A. A. Faktory stressoustoychivosti uchiteley // Voprosy psikhologii. – 1997. – №. 1. – S. 45–54.

26. Rean A. A., Konovalov I. A. Otsenka pedagogami podrostkovoy agressivnosti: sotsial’nopertseptivnyye aspekty i gotovnost’ k vmeshatel’stvu // Rossiyskiy deviantologicheskiy zhurnal. – 2021. – №. 1 (2). – S. 276–295; https://doi.org/10.35750/2713-0622-2021-2-276-295

27. Rean A. A., Konovalov I. A., Kosheleva Ye. S. Sovladaniye pedagoga s destruktivnym povedeniyem uchashchikhsya: reaktsiya na agressiyu uchashchikhsya i agressivnost’ pedagogov // Integratsiya obrazovaniya. – 2022. – T. 26. – №. 4 (109). – S. 688–707; https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.109.026.202204.688-707.

28. Bratus’ B. S. K probleme cheloveka v psikhologii // Voprosy psikhologii. – 1997. – № 5. – S. 3–19.

29. Ushinskiy K. D. O pol’ze pedagogicheskoy literatury : [iz «Sobraniya pedagogicheskikh sochineniy». – Sankt-Peterburg: tip. M. Merkusheva, 1895. – 29 s.

GOST

Rean A. A., Avdeeva E. S., Konovalov I. A. Locus of control and teachers’ perceptions of adolescents’ involvement in aggression // Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2024. no. 2. pp. 323-334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2024-2-323-334. (Date of access 30.09.2026).

MLA

Artur Rean, Avdeeva E. S., Konovalov I. A.. "Locus of control and teachers’ perceptions of adolescents’ involvement in aggression." Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia 2024.2 (2024): 323-334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2024-2-323-334.

APA

Rean A. A., Avdeeva E. S., Konovalov I. A. (2024). Locus of control and teachers’ perceptions of adolescents’ involvement in aggression. Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2024(2), 323-334. https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2024-2-323-334

Chicago

Artur Rean, Avdeeva E. S., Konovalov I. A.. "Locus of control and teachers’ perceptions of adolescents’ involvement in aggression." Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia 2024, no. 2 (2024): 323-334. https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2024-2-323-334.

WIKI

{{cite journal | author = Rean A. A., Avdeeva E. S., Konovalov I. A. | title = Locus of control and teachers’ perceptions of adolescents’ involvement in aggression | journal = Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia | year = 2024 | volume = 2024 | issue = 2 | pages = 323-334 | doi = 10.35750/2071-8284-2024-2-323-334 }}

Copy

Export: BibTeX EndNote RefMan RusMARC

LOCUS OF CONTROL AND TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS OF ADOLESCENTS’ INVOLVEMENT IN AGGRESSION Locus of control and teachers’ perceptions of adolescents’ involvement in aggression

Confirmation