The right for defense to protect property rights and personal non-property rights: real or illusive

Andrey Nikulenko; Maksim A. Smirnov

doi:10.35750/2071-8284-2024-3-228-239

VAK Russia 5.1.4 UDC 343.2/.7

2 more Collapse

THE RIGHT FOR DEFENSE TO PROTECT PROPERTY RIGHTS AND PERSONAL NON-PROPERTY RIGHTS: REAL OR ILLUSIVE The right for defense to protect property rights and personal non-property rights: real or illusive

АА Аа

Published in Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia · Volume 2024, Issue 3 · Pages 228–239 · Rubric: CRIMINAL LAW SCIENCES

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2024-3-228-239

Received: 04.03.2024 Accepted: 05.09.2024 Published: 27.09.2024 Language of publication: RUS

Authors

Andrey Nikulenko

ORCID ResearcherID SPIN

Maksim A. Smirnov

ORCID

Andrey Nikulenko

Academic degree: doctor of jurisprudence sciences

Science rang: professor

Saint Petersburg University of the MIA of Russia uchenyy sekretar' · uchenyy sovet · Russian Federation

ORCID ResearcherID SPIN

Maksim A. Smirnov

Academic degree: candidate of jurisprudence sciences

Administration of Okulov municipal region assistant prosecutor · Russian Federation · V. Novgorod

ORCID

ABSTRACT

Introduction. By virtue of the provisions of Article 45 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, everyone is guaranteed the right to defend personal rights and freedoms in all ways not prohibited by law. This fundamental constitutional principle is reflected in Article 37 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (hereinafter referred to as the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation), which enshrines the right of any person to the necessary defence, that is, to harm (up to deprivation of life) an encroaching person while suppressing socially dangerous encroachments protecting oneself or other persons, the legally protected interests of society or the state. For a long time, the issue of the possibility of protecting property rights, including housing, within the framework of necessary defense remained debatable. Finally, in May 2022, amendments were made to the resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated 09/27/2012 Nº 19, enshrining the right for necessary defense in the event of expected changes that will empower citizens to serve as a basis for their revision. In this regard, it should be recognised as relevant to consider the issue of determining the limits of lawful infliction of harm in the suppression of encroachments related to illegal penetration of housing. Within the framework of this work, the authors also consider the issue of determining the limits of lawful infliction of harm in defence against encroachments on personal non-property rights, both associated and not associated with the use or threat of use of violence dangerous to the life of the defender. Research methods: theoretical, comparativelegal, method of formal logics, method of interpretation of legal norms. Due to the results of the research, the authors give a list of situations which were not taken into account by the judicial community including the right to defend the house, which should serve as a basis for legal review of the case. In addition, the authors point to the need to optimize Article 37 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, the provisions of the resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated September 27, 2012 No. 19 in terms of expanding the right for necessary defense due to the possibility of suppressing administrative offenses within its framework and bringing it into line with Article 37 of the Criminal Code, as well as other circumstances excluding criminality acts, «special legislation» defining the procedure and grounds for the use of force and weapons by law enforcement officers.

KEYWORDS

necessary defence, exceeding the limits of necessary defence, attack, encroachment, violence, home defence

Text

Text (PDF)

Read Download

1. Vestov F. A., Yakubzhonov Zh. M. Otdel'nye aspekty ustanovleniya priznakov neobhodimoy oborony ili ee prevysheniya / Transformaciya pravovyh institutov i metodov obespecheniya sanitarno-epidemiologicheskogo blagopoluchiya i ekologicheskoy bezopasnosti v Rossii, stranah SNG i Evropeyskogo soyuza : materialy IX Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, 7 oktyabrya 2022 g. – Saratov: Saratovskiy istochnik, 2023. – S. 49–53.

2. Goncharov N. N., Egorov V. N., Barinov V. A. Innovacionnaya samozaschita bez oruzhiya kak effektivnaya al'ternativa boevym priemam bor'by // Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Fizicheskaya kul'tura. Sport. – 2023. – № 12. – S. 10–16; https://doi.org/10.24412/2305-8404-2023-12-10-16.

3. Cherkesov R. M., Kushhov H. L. Neobhodimaya oborona v deyatel'nosti sotrudnika policii // Zhurnal prikladnyh issledovaniy. – 2023. – № 2. – S. 150–153; https://doi.org/10.47576/2712-7516_2023_2_150.

4. Bikmashev V. A., Savenko I. A. Pravovye osnovy primeneniya fizicheskoy sily, special'nyh sredstv, ognestrel'nogo oruzhiya voennosluzhaschimi (sotrudnikami) voysk nacional'noy gvardii Rossiyskoy Federacii // Vestnik Krasnodarskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. – 2023. – № 3 (61). – S. 16–23.

5. Burchikauskas V. A. Poryadok, usloviya i osnovaniya primeneniya ognestrel'nogo oruzhiya sotrudnikami policii: problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya i ugolovno-pravovoy ocenki posledstviy ego primeneniya // Nauchnyy portal MVD Rossii. – 2023. – № 3 (63). – S. 39–47.

6. Krasnov A. A. K voprosu o sovershenstvovanii normativnyh predpisaniy ugolovnogo zakona o neobhodimoy oborone, primenyaemoy sotrudnikami pravoohranitel'nyh organov // Sovremennyy uchenyy. – 2023. – № 1. – S. 313–318.

7. Mayorova E. I., Yakovleva L. V. Kvalifikaciya deystviy sotrudnikov organov vnutrennih del pri prevyshenii predelov neobhodimoy oborony, krayney neobhodimosti, a takzhe mer, neobhodimyh dlya zaderzhaniya lica, sovershivshego prestuplenie / Effektivnoe protivodeystvie prestupnosti v usloviyah globalizacii: problemy i perspektivy : materialy XXV Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, 21–22 maya 2021 g. – Krasnodar: Krasnodarskiy universitet MVD Rossii, 2021. – S. 168–173.

8. Nikulenko A. V., Smirnov M. A. Imeyutsya li predely dopustimogo prichineniya vreda v deyatel'nosti sotrudnikov policii i Rosgvardii // Vestnik Belgorodskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii imeni I. D. Putilina. – 2023. – № 3. – S. 4–12.

9. Nikulenko A. V. Perspektivy ugolovnoy politiki v sfere pravovoy reglamentacii neobhodimoy oborony // Iskusstvo pravovedeniya. – 2023. – № 2 (6). – S. 60–66.

10. Nikolaeva T. V. K voprosu ob ugolovno-pravovoy reglamentacii usloviy pravomernosti neobhodimoy oborony / Aktual'nye problemy sovremennyh obschestvennyh nauk v usloviyah social'no-politicheskih i ekonomicheskih transformaciy : materialy XI Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii molodyh uchenyh, 15–30 avgusta 2022 g. / otv. red. A. M. Shayahmetov. – Ufa: Bashkirskaya akademiya gosudarstvennoy sluzhby i upravleniya pri Glave Respubliki Bashkortostan, 2022. – S. 287–292.

11. Sharapov R. D. osnovanie neobhodimoy oborony // Pravda i Zakon. – 2021. – № 4 (18). – S. 22–29.

12. Homenko A. N. K voprosu ob ustanovlenii sostoyaniya neobhodimoy oborony / Evraziyskaya integraciya: sovremennye trendy i perspektivnye napravleniya : materialy V Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, 14–18 marta 2022 g. – Omsk: Izdatel'stvo Omskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnicheskogo universiteta, 2022. – S. 155–162.

13. Tarakanov I. A. Neobhodimaya oborona: specifika opredeleniya momenta vozniknoveniya prava na prichinenie vreda posyagayuschemu licu / Nedelya rossiyskoy nauki v Ryazanskom filiale Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii imeni V. Ya. Kikotya : sbornik nauchnyh trudov, 1–8 fevralya 2023 g. : [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Ryazan': Moskovskiy universitet Ministerstva vnutrennih del Rossiyskoy Federacii im. V. Ya. Kikotya, 2023. – S. 450–454.

14. Donskaya O. G., Moskaleva E. N., Rozatos M. M. Analiz rekomendaciy Verhovnogo Suda RF po primeneniyu instituta neobhodimoy oborony // Uchenye zapiski Krymskogo federal'nogo universiteta imeni V. I. Vernadskogo. Yuridicheskie nauki. – 2023. – T. 9 (75), № 1. – S. 334–339.

15. Garbatovich D. A. Problemy kvalifikacii neobhodimoy oborony // Administrator suda. – 2023. – № 2. – S. 22–25.

16. Malkin V. R. Predely neobhodimoy oborony. Zakonodatel'naya reglamentaciya i pravoprimenitel'naya praktika // Nauchnyy vestnik Orlovskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii imeni V. V. Luk'yanova. – 2023. – № 2 (95). – S. 135–143.

17. Garmyshev Ya. V., Ishigeev V. S. Neobhodimaya oborona: problemnye aspekty teorii i praktiki, puti sovershenstvovaniya zakonodatel'stva Rossii // Sibirskie ugolovno-processual'nye i kriminalisticheskie chteniya. – 2023. – № 3 (41). – S. 17–25; https://doi.org/10.17150/2411-6122.2023.3.17-25.

18. Nikulenko A. V., Smirnov M. A. Institut neobhodimoy oborony v deyatel'nosti sotrudnikov pravoohranitel'nyh organov : monografiya. – Sankt-Peterburg: Yuridicheskiy centr, 2023. – 480 s.

19. Parhomenko S. V., Milyukov S. F., Nikulenko A. V. Vektory ugolovnoy politiki v sfere pravovoy reglamentacii obstoyatel'stv, isklyuchayuschih prestupnost' deyaniya // Vserossiyskiy kriminologicheskiy zhurnal. – 2019. – T. 13, № 6. – S. 992–1001; https://doi.org/10.17150/2500-4255.2019.13(6).992-1001.

20. Pobegaylo E. O predelah neobhodimoy oborony // Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2008. – № 2. – C. 69–74.

21. Vishnyakova N. V., Kuznecov A. A. Neobhodimaya oborona ot posyagatel'stva, svyazannogo s nezakonnym proniknoveniem v zhilische // Zakon i pravo. – 2023. – № 8. – S. 199-203; https://doi.org/10.56539/20733313_2023_8_ 199.

22. Merkur'ev V. V., Novikov A. V., Tarakanov I. A., Slabkaya D. N. Zaschita ot obschestvenno opasnyh posyagatel'stv, sopryazhennyh s narusheniem neprikosnovennosti zhilischa: osobennosti pravovoy ocenki usloviy neobhodimoy oborony // Voprosy rossiyskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava. – 2022. – T. 12, № 2A. – S. 370–382; https://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2022.46.83.052.

23. Lukki E. V., Shul'ga A. V. Neobhodimaya oborona pri posyagatel'stvah na chlenov sem'i: ugolovno-pravovye i kriminologicheskie aspekty : monografiya. – Moskva: Yurlitinform, 2021. – 176 s.

GOST

Nikulenko A. V., Smirnov M. A. The right for defense to protect property rights and personal non-property rights: real or illusive // Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2024. no. 3. pp. 228-239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2024-3-228-239. (Date of access 20.09.2026).

MLA

Andrey Nikulenko, Smirnov M. A.. "The right for defense to protect property rights and personal non-property rights: real or illusive." Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia 2024.3 (2024): 228-239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2024-3-228-239.

APA

Nikulenko A. V., Smirnov M. A. (2024). The right for defense to protect property rights and personal non-property rights: real or illusive. Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2024(3), 228-239. https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2024-3-228-239

Chicago

Andrey Nikulenko, Smirnov M. A.. "The right for defense to protect property rights and personal non-property rights: real or illusive." Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia 2024, no. 3 (2024): 228-239. https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2024-3-228-239.

WIKI

{{cite journal | author = Nikulenko A. V., Smirnov M. A. | title = The right for defense to protect property rights and personal non-property rights: real or illusive | journal = Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia | year = 2024 | volume = 2024 | issue = 3 | pages = 228-239 | doi = 10.35750/2071-8284-2024-3-228-239 }}

Copy

Export: BibTeX EndNote RefMan RusMARC

THE RIGHT FOR DEFENSE TO PROTECT PROPERTY RIGHTS AND PERSONAL NON-PROPERTY RIGHTS: REAL OR ILLUSIVE The right for defense to protect property rights and personal non-property rights: real or illusive

Confirmation