Our website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with this notice and the Terms of Use.
News
Submit manuscript
Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Journals / Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia / Volume 2024 Issue 2 / Presumption of guilt in the Russian criminal law
VAK Russia 5.1.4 UDC 343.2

PRESUMPTION OF GUILT IN THE RUSSIAN CRIMINAL LAW Presumption of guilt in the Russian criminal law

Published in Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia · Volume 2024, Issue 2 · Pages 121–136 · Rubric: CRIMINAL LAW SCIENCES
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2024-2-121-136
Received: 30.01.2024 Accepted: 17.05.2024 Published: 28.06.2024 Language of publication: RUS
Authors
SE
Sergey Veklenko
ORCID
ABSTRACT
Introduction. The problem of correct understanding of the essence, content and legislative regulation of guilt continues to be one of the most actual for the national criminal law, as many conceptual issues directly depend on its correct solution. Undoubtedly, at different times this problem repeatedly became the subject of scientific research, but not all controversial and ambiguous issues have been brought to a solution acceptable by the majority of scientists and law enforcement officials. Methods. In the process of scientific research general scientific methods (dialectical, systemic, structural, formal-logical, analysis, synthesis, analogy, functional) and speciallegal methods of research (legal-technical, dogmatic, comparative-legal) were used. In particular, the use of paired categories of dialectics made it possible to establish an inseparable connection and interdependence between the concept and essence of guilt, between its forms and content. Results. The author formulates an original concept of guilt of a person having committed an offence, as well as its most significant forms of manifestation for law enforcement practice, which require legislative enshrinement and law enforcement use in counteracting modern crime. For practical implementation of the formulated proposals, the author considers it necessary to make appropriate changes in the current Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.
KEYWORDS
presumption, guilt, culpability, imputation, blamefulness, inappropriate
Text References
Text
Text (PDF)
Read Download

1. Sartr Zh. P. Ekzistentsializm – eto gumanizm / Sumerki bogov / sost. i obshch. red. A. A. Yakovleva ; Perevod. – Moskva: Politizdat, 1990. – S. 319–344.

2. Il’in I. A. O sushchnosti pravosoznaniya / sost. i avt. vstup. st. I. Smirnov. – Moskva: Rarog, 1993. – 234 s.

3. Denisov Yu. A. Obshchaya teoriya pravonarusheniya i otvetstvennosti : Sotsiologicheskiye i yuridicheskiye aspekty. – Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo LGU, 1983. – 142 s.

4. Nedopekina T. B. Prestypnoe legkomislie: voproci zakonodatelnogo regylirovaniia, problem teorii I praktiki. – M.: Yrlitinform, 2011. – 176 s.

5. Sergeyeva T. L. Voprosy vinovnosti i viny v praktike Verkhovnogo Suda SSSR po ugolovnym delam. – Moskva; Izdatel’stvo i 2-ya tipografiya izdatel’stva Akademii nauk SSSR v Moskve, 1950. – 184 s.

6. Martsev A. I. Obshchiye voprosy ucheniya o prestuplenii : monografiya. – Omsk: Omskiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii, 2000. – 136 s.

7. Kelina S. G. Nekotoryye napravleniya sovershenstvovaniya ugolovnogo zakonodatel’stva // Sovetskoye gosudarstvo i pravo. – 1987. – № 5. – S. 65–71.

8. Rarog A. I. Problema viny i reforma ugolovnogo zakonodatel’stva / Problemy ugolovnopravovoy bor’by s prestupnost’yu : sbornik nauchnykh trudov / otv. red. B. V. Zdravomyslov. – Moskva: [b. i.], 1989. – S. 14–24.

9. Yazovskikh Yu. A. Prevysheniye predelov neobkhodimoy oborony i printsip viny // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. – 1997. – № 3 (15). – S. 129–136.

10. Zhalinskiy A. E. Sovremennoye nemetskoye ugolovnoye pravo. – Moskva: Prospekt, 2006. – 560 s.

11. Utevskiy B. S. Vina v sovetskom ugolovnom prave. – Moskva: Gosudarstvennoye izdatel’stvo yuridicheskoy literatury, 1950. – 318 s.

12. Nazarenko G. V. Vina v ugolovnom prave. – Orel: Orlovskaya vysshaya shkola MVD RF, 1996. – 94 s.

13. Veklenko S. V. Ponyatiye, sushchnost’, soderzhaniye i formy viny v ugolovnom prave : monografiya. – Omsk: Omskaya akademiya MVD Rossii, 2002. – 192 s.

14. Veklenko S. V. Dialektika i voprosy viny v ugolovnom prave : monografiya. – Omsk: Omskaya akademiya MVD Rossii, 2003. – 84 s.

15. Plotnikov A. I. Ob”yektivnoye i sub”yektivnoye v prestuplenii : monografiya / otv. red. A. I. Chuchayev. – Moskva: Prospekt, 2011. – 240 s.

PDF Text JATS XML
The contact persons
Larisa Kaverina
Editor in chief
Larisa Kaverina
journalspbmvd@mail.ru +7(812)730-26-96
Eliana Ytrobina
Editorial office
Eliana Ytrobina
demushkina.eliana@mail.ru +7(911)959-89-96
6165
downloads
RINC RINC Science Index Crossref VAK Cyberleninka Google Scholar Ulrichs
© vestnikspbmvd.ru
Agreement Personal data protection and processing policy Support Powered by Editorum, 2026 Instructions
Login or Create
* Forgot your password?