Our website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with this notice and the Terms of Use.
News
Submit manuscript
Russian Journal of Deviant Behavior
Journals / Russian Journal of Deviant Behavior / Issue 2021 1 (1), 2021 / Deviant behavior of employees of internal affairs bodies: experience of dialectical assessment
UDC
34
CSCSTI
04.81 10.77
Russian Classification of Professions by Education
40.06.01
Russian Library and Bibliographic Classification
67 6751
BISAC
LAW026000
VAK Russia
5.3.9

DEVIANT BEHAVIOR OF EMPLOYEES OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS BODIES: EXPERIENCE OF DIALECTICAL ASSESSMENT Deviant behavior of employees of internal affairs bodies: experience of dialectical assessment

Published in Russian Journal of Deviant Behavior · Pages 151–163 · Rubric: Legal counteraction to deviant behavior
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35750/2713-0622-2021-1-151-163
Received: 07.03.2021 Accepted: 14.05.2021 Published: 22.05.2021 Language of publication: RUS
Authors
SE
Sergey F. Milyukov
ORCID
AN
Andrey Nikulenko
ORCID
ABSTRACT
In modern Russia, the problem of countering socially dangerous manifestations acts as a national project that proclaims the right of citizens to safe living conditions. Much attention is paid to the ability of law enforcement officers to resist criminal expansion legally, to be able to protect themselves and others by means of legal use of force against persons who commit socially dangerous encroachments. Guided by the concept of deviance, the authors made an attempt to analyze the problem of lawful behavior by law enforcement officers, primarily police officers. The researchers came to a reasonable conclusion about the need to adjust the current state of affairs. The legislation and the practice of its application cannot satisfy the interests of representatives of law enforcement agencies engaged in official activities for the protection of public order and ensuring of public safety. Imperfect legislation is the main reason of deviant behavior of police officers who are in permanent stress situations. Their abundance also provokes deviant behavior of police officers, which sometimes manifests itself in extreme brutality towards lawbreakers. From our point of view, the current norms of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, primarily the norms of Chapter 8, are not clear enough. Moreover, their legislative wording is far from being perfect and gives the opportunity to shift the blame for causing harm to persons who do it in circumstances that exclude the criminality of the act. The proposed careful adjustment of the norms of criminal legislation will significantly increase the effectiveness of their practical implementation, instill confidence in the consciousness of police officers about the importance and possibility of offensive legitimate steps to influence crime, as well as to increase their legal protection.
KEYWORDS
police behavior deviance, criminal legislation. awful infliction of harm
Text References
Text
Text (PDF)
Read Download

1. Higgins, P., Butler, R. (1982). Understanding Deviance. McGraw-Hill.

2. Luhmann, N. (1992). Beobachtungen der Moderne. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

3. Palmer, S., Humphery, J. (1990). Deviant Behavior: Patterns, Source and Control. NY-L: Plenum Press.

4. Sumner, C. (1994). The Sociology of Deviance. An Obituary. Buckingham: Open University Press.

5. Astaf ’yev, Yu. V. (2009). Ugolovno-pravovyye granitsy dopustimogo povedeniya sotrudnikov operativno-rozysknykh organov i ikh doverennykh lits v protsesse proizvodstva ORM. V. V. Trukhachev (Red.), Ugolovnoye pravo i kriminologiya: sovremennoye sostoyaniye i perspektivy razvitiya: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov (5-15 ). Voronezh: Izd-vo Voronezh. gos. un-ta.

6. Baburin, V. V. (2006). Kvalifikatsiya ugolovno-pravovogo riska. Moskow: Ileksa.

7. Baburin, V. V. (2007). Ugolovno-pravovaya otsenka pravomernogo prichineniya vreda. Ugolovnoye pravo, (3), 7-11.

8. Baburin, V. V. (2008). Kontseptsiya riska v ugolovnom prave. Omsk: Omskaya akademiya MVD Rossii.

9. Baburin, V. V. (2011). Soderzhaniye elementov i priznakov sostava pravomernogo prichineniya vreda pri obosnovannom riske. V. V. Veklenko (Red.), Voprosy pravovoy teorii i praktiki: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov. (66-77). Omsk: Izd-vo Omsk. akad. MVD Rossii.

10. Bauman, Z. (1996). Myslit’ sotsiologicheski: ucheb. posobiye. (A. F. Filippova, Red.) Moskow: Aspekt-Press.

11. Berestovoy, A. N. (1999). Obosnovannyy risk kak obstoyatel’stvo, isklyuchayushcheye prestupnost’ deyaniya. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Saint Petersburg.

12. Berestovoy, N. P., Milyukov, S. F. (1992). Professional’nyy i khozyaystvennyy risk kak obstoyatel’stvo, isklyuchayushcheye obshchestvennuyu opasnost’ i protivopravnost’ deyaniya. Aktual’nyye problemy bor’by s ekonomicheskoy prestup¬nost’yu, 88-89.

13. Blinnikov, V. A., Pobegaylo, E. F., Milyukov, S. F., Yakun’kov, M. A., Veselov, Ye. G., Kozayev, N. SH., Solomonenko, I. G., Aryamov, A. A., Baulin, YU. V. (2007). Entsiklopediya ugolovnogo prava (T. 7). Saint Petersburg: Izdaniye professora Malinina.

14. Boronoyev, A. O. (Red.). (1994). Interv’yu s professorom N. Lumanom. Problemy teoreticheskoy sotsiologii (9), 50-60.

15. Burd’ye, P. (1996). Za ratsionalisticheskiy istorizm. V Sotsio-Logos postmodernizma. Al’manakh Rossiysko-frantsuzskogo tsentra sotsiologicheskikh issledovaniy Instituta sotsiologii RAN (str. 9-29). Moskow: Institut eksperimental’noy sotsiologii.

16. Byulleten’ Verkhovnogo Suda SSSR. (1988). (6).

17. Garbatovich, D. A. (2017). Obosnovannyy risk: algoritm kvalifikatsii. Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo, 17 (1), 19-24.

18. Gilinskiy, Ya. I. (2021). Deviantologiya: sotsiologiya prestupnosti, narkotizma, prostitutsii, samoubiystv i drugikh «otkloneniy». Saint Petersburg: Alef-Press.

19. Grinberg, M. S. (1957). Znacheniye proizvodstvenno-khozyaystvennogo riska po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu. Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Leningrad.

20. Grinberg, M. S. (1963). Problemy proizvodstvennogo riska v ugolovnom prave. Moskow: Gosyurizdat.

21. Zharkikh, I. (2021). Aktual’nyye voprosy razgranicheniya pravomernogo operativno-rozysknogo meropriyatiya i provokatsii prestupleniya. Ugolovnoye pravo, (2), 19-24.

22. Zimin, V. P. (1992). Pravomernoye ispolneniye prikaza: doktrina «umnykh shtykov». Pravovedeniye (2), 35-45.

23. Internet-gazeta «Fontanka». (12 avgusta 2020 g.). Polucheno 28 fevralya 2021 g., iz www.fontanka.ru: https://www.fontanka.ru/2020/08/12/69416809/

24. Internet-gazeta «Fontanka». (23 noyabrya 2020 g.). Polucheno 28 fevralya 2021 g., iz www.fontanka.ru: https://www.fontanka.ru/2020/11/23/69570133/

25. Internet-gazeta «Fontanka». (17 fevralya 2021 g.). Polucheno 23 fevralya 2021 g., iz www.fontanka.ru: https://www.fontanka.ru/2021/02/17/69771239/

26. Internet-gazeta Fontanka. (31 yanvarya 2021 g.). Polucheno 5 fevralya 2021 g., iz www.fontanka.ru: https://www.fontanka.ru/2021/01/31/69739993/

27. Isichenko, A. P. (2009). Novelly v operativno-rozysknom i militseyskom zakonodatel’stve. Nauchnyy portal MVD Rossii, (4 (8)), 60-67.

28. Ishigeyev, V. S., Lapsha, V. L. (2019). Obosnovannyy risk v sravnenii s drugimi obstoyatel’stvami, isklyuchayushchimi prestupnost’ deyaniya. Vestnik Sibirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii, (1 (34)), 81-87.

29. Ishigeyev, V. S., Lapsha, V. L. (2019). Ugolovno-pravovaya kharakteristika obosnovannogo riska v aspekte ustanovleniya yego svoystv (priznakov). Vestnik Vostochno-Sibirskogo instituta MVD Rossii, (3 (90)), 32-43.

30. Kadnikov, N. G., Dmitrenko, A. P., Russkevich, Ye. A. (2015). Obstoyatel’stva, isklyuchayushchiye prestupnost’ deyaniya. V I. M. Matskevicha (Red.), Ugolovnoye pravo Rossii. Obshchaya i Osobennaya chasti: uchebnik (990). Moskow.

31. Kelina, S. (1988). Professional’nyy risk kak obstoyatel’stvo, isklyuchayushcheye prestupnost’ deyaniya. Sovetskaya yustitsiya, (22), 14-15.

32. Kozayev, N. Sh. (2016). Sovremennyye problemy ugolovnogo prava, obuslovlennyye nauchno-tekhnicheskim progressom: dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. Moskow.

33. Korneyeva, Ya. A., Simonova, N. N. (2020). Professional’naya lichnostnaya deformatsiya sotrudnikov organov vnutrennikh del. Organizatsionnaya psikhologii (10 (2)), 80-106.

34. Krapiva, I. I. (2009). Soblyudeniye zakonnosti v operativno-rozysknoy deyatel’nosti i provokatsiya. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, (3), 87-92.

35. Kudryavtsev, V. N. (Red.). (1987). Ugolovnyy zakon: Opyt teoreticheskogo modelirovaniya. Moskow: Nauka.

36. Milyukov, S. F. (2000). Rossiyskoye ugolovnoye zakonodatel’stvo: opyt kriticheskogo analiza. Saint Petersburg: SPbIVE-SEP, Znaniye.

37. Milyukov, S. F. (2009). Obstoyatel’stva, isklyuchayushchiye prestupnost’ deyaniya. G. L. Kastorskogo (Red.), Ugolovnoye pravo Rossii. Obshchaya chast’: uchebnik (754). Saint Petersburg: OOO “Knizhnyy dom”.

38. Milyukov, S. F., Zuyeva, Yu. V. (2021). Neobkhodimaya oborona v sisteme mul’tipravovogo instituta samozashchity (doktrina, praktika, tekhnika). (V. M. Baranova, Red.) Moskow: Izd-vo Prospekt.

39. Milyukov, S. F., Nikulenko, A. V. (2020). Prichineniye vreda pri zaderzhanii litsa, sovershivsheye obshchestvenno opasnoye deyaniye (izd. 2). Saint Petersburg: Yuridicheskiy tsentr.

40. Miroshnichenko, N. V. (2015). Obosnovannyy risk kak obstoyatel’stvo, isklyuchayushcheye prestupnost’ deyaniya, pri ispolnenii professional’nykh funktsiy. Obshchestvo i pravo, (1 (51)), 94-98.

41. Mikhal’, O. (2003). Professional’nyy (obosnovannyy) risk pri osvobozhdenii zalozhnikov. Ugolovnoye pravo , (1), 39-40.

42. Model’nyy ugolovnyy kodeks: rekomendatel’nyy zakonodatel’nyy akt dlya Sodruzhestva Nezavisimykh Gosudarstv. (1996). Pravovedeniye, (1), 99.

43. Monson, P. (1995). Lodka na alleyakh parka. Vvedeniye v sotsiologiyu. Moskow: Izd-vo «Ves’ mir».

44. Moskovskiy komsomolets v Pitere. (27 fevralya 2021 g.). Polucheno 28 fevralya 2021 g., iz spb.mk.ru: https://spb.mk.ru/in¬cident/2021/02/27/sk-ne-stal-vozbuzhdat-delo-protiv-peterburgskogo-silovika-udarivshego-zhenshhinu-v-zhi¬vot.html?utm_source=yxnews&utm_medium=desktop&nw=1614669649000

45. Nikulenko, A. V. (2014). Aktual’nyye problemy sovremennoy nauki: Sektsiya «Pravo i pravoprimeneniye». Obosnovannyy risk v deyatel’nosti politsii, (178-183). Lipetsk: Lipetskiy munitsipal’nyy institut prava i ekonomiki.

46. Nikulenko, A. V. (2014). Problemy kvalifikatsii obosnovannogo riska v pravookhranitel’noy deyatel’nosti. Vestnik Sankt- Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii, (3 (63)), 59-62.

47. Nikulenko, A. V. (2019). Obstoyatel’stva, isklyuchayushchiye prestupnost’ deyaniya: kontseptual’nyye osnovy ugolovno-pravo¬voy reglamentatsii: avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. Saint Petersburg.

48. Omel’chenko, A. V. (1955). Tvorcheskiy risk i yego gosudarstvenno-pravovaya okhrana. Moskow: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta.

49. Parkhomenko, S. V. (2004). Deyaniya, prestupnost’ kotorykh isklyuchayetsya v silu sotsial’noy poleznosti i neobkhodimosti. Saint Petersburg: Yurid. tsentr Press.

50. Parkhomenko, S. V. (2016). Problemy i perspektivy sovershenstvovaniya ugolovno-pravovoy reglamentatsii obosnovannogo riska. Sibirskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik, (4), 34-39.

51. Petrovskiy, A. V. (2007). Operativno-rozysknaya deyatel’nost’ i obstoyatel’stva, isklyuchayushchiye prestupnost’ deyaniya. Problemy realizatsii ugolovnoy politiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii na regional’nom urovne, 209-216.

52. Polotskiy, S. (9 noyabrya 2017 g.). Derzhi karman …uzhe. Sankt-Peterburgskiye vedomosti. 2017. 9 noyabrya.

53. Rossiyskaya gazeta. (27 iyul’ 2015 g.). Postanovleniye Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 14 iyulya 2015 g. № 21-P g. Saint Petersburg.

54. Samorokov, V. I. (1993). Risk v ugolovnom prave. Gosudarstvo i pravo, (5), 103-112.

55. Sakharov, A. B. (1987). Obstoyatel’stva, isklyuchayushchiye ugolovnuyu otvetstvennost’. Sovetskoye gosudarstvo i pravo, (11), 111-118.

56. Sitkovskaya, O. D. (1998). Psikhologiya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti. Moskow: Izdatel’stvo NORMA.

57. Slutskiy, I. I. (1956). Obstoyatel’stva, isklyuchayushchiye ugolovnuyu otvetstvennost’. Leningrad: Izd-vo Leningr. un-ta.

58. Trubnikova, T. V. (2015). Pravo na zashchitu: pravovyye pozitsii YESPCH i ikh otrazheniye v postanovlenii Plenuma VS RF. Ugolovnyy protsess, 8, 34-45.

59. Chernikov, V. (2019). Riski politseyskogo zakonodatel’stva. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika: «Riski v zakonotvorchestve, pravorealizatsii, yuridicheskoy nauke: tekhnika formirovaniya i funktsionirovaniya sistemy upravleniya», (13), 41-46.

60. Shkabin, G. S. (2015). Differentsiatsiya i individualizatsiya otvetstvennosti v ugolovnom i ugolovno-ispolnitel’nom prave. V V. F. Lapshina (Red.), Ponyatiye provokatsii prestupleniya v otechestvennom zakonodatel’stve (174-179). Ryazan’: Akademiya prava i upravleniya Federal’noy sluzhby ispolneniya nakazaniy.

61. Shurdumov, A. (2002). Obosnovannyy risk . Ugolovnoye pravo, 3, 60-62.

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
PDF Text JATS XML
The contact persons
Artur Rean
Editor in chief
Artur Rean
profrean@yandex.ru
Kirill Zlokazov
Deputy Chief Editor
Kirill Zlokazov
zkirvit@yandex.ru
Maksim Bavsun
Chairman of the editorial board
Maksim Bavsun
kafedramvd@mail.ru
Larisa Kaverina
Executive Secretary of the Editorial Board
Larisa Kaverina
journalspbmvd@mail.ru +7(812)730-26-96
8427
downloads
RINC RINC Science Index Crossref Cyberleninka Ulrichs Colab
CC
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Creative Commons
© vestnikspbmvd.ru
Agreement Personal data protection and processing policy Support Powered by Editorum, 2026 Instructions
Login or Create
* Forgot your password?