VAK Russia 12.00.09 UDC 34 CSCSTI 10.79

TEACHER AND PSYCHOLOGIST AS TWO INDEPENDENT PROCEDURAL FIGURES OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS Teacher and psychologist as two independent procedural figures of criminal proceedings

Published in Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia · Volume 2019, Issue 3 · Pages 118–123 · Rubric: Criminal process
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2019-3-118-123
Received: 09.10.2019 Accepted: 27.11.2025 Language of publication: RUS
The relevance of the scientific article is not in doubt, due to the need to create a friendly justice in relation to the minor. The article deals with the problems associated with the need to distinguish the role and functions of a psychologist and a teacher as two completely independent procedural figures. Theoretical and practical justifications of participation of the psychologist and the teacher in criminal proceedings are analyzed. The difference between the above-mentioned procedural figures is emphasized. Attention is focused on the need to take into account the difference between psychological and pedagogical knowledge. The article uses the following research methods: General dialectical method of cognition, as well as General scientific and private scientific methods: formal logical methods (analysis, synthesis, concretization, analogy), methods of comparative research, formal legal. The article concludes about the invaluable role of a psychologist and a teacher, while the author distinguishes the above-mentioned procedural figures. In addition, the author substantiates the contradictions arising in theory and practice at the choice of a psychologist and a teacher in criminal proceedings. At the same time, the author emphasizes that the psychologist and the teacher perform various functions, both in the preliminary investigation and in the trial of a criminal case involving a minor.
criminal proceedings, psychologist, pedagogue, minors, justification, function
Text References
Text (PDF)
Read Download

1. Vinickiy L. V., Surmeneva S. V. Uchastie psihologa v stadii predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya: monografiya. - Moskva: Yurlitinform, 2015. - 272 s.

2. Bychkov A. N. Uchastie pedagoga v rossiyskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve : monografiya. - Moskva: Yurlitinform, 2011. - 176 s.

3. Cvetkova E. V. Ob uchastii pedagoga (psihologa) pri provedenii sledstvennyh deystviy // Yuridicheskiy vestnik Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. - 2012. - № 1 (10). - S. 20-23.

4. Hramcova V. V. Osobennosti pravovogo statusa pedagoga i psihologa kak uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Ekspert-kriminalist. - 2018. - № 1. - S. 32-34.

5. Kurmaeva N. A. Problemy uchastiya specialista-psihologa v doprose nesovershennoletnih podozrevaemyh i obvinyaemyh // Yuridicheskiy zhurnal. - 2009. - № 1. - S. 146-148.

6. Lyubichev S. G. Osobennosti rassledovaniya prestupleniy nesovershennoletnih na sovremennom etape // Problemy otpravleniya pravosudiya po ugolovnym delam v sovremennoy Rossii: teoriya i praktika : sbornik nauchnyh statey. - Ch. 1. - Kursk: Izd-vo Kursk. gos. tehn. un-ta, 2007. - S. 163-166.

7. Popov A. N. Proizvodstvo po delam o prestupleniyah nesovershennoletnih : monografiya / 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. - Kn. 1. - Krasnoyarsk: GOU VPO «Sib. gos. tehnol. un-t», 2004. - 156 s.

8. Mashinskaya N. V. Problemy obespecheniya effektivnogo uchastiya pedagoga i psihologa v dosudebnom proizvodstve po ugolovnym delam nesovershennoletnih // Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal'nogo universiteta. - Seriya «Gumanitarnye i social'nye nauki». - 2015. - № 2. - S. 123-130.

9. Moiseev N. A., Pogonina E. A., Stolbina L. V. Psihologo-pravovye aspekty uchastiya pedagoga (psihologa) v doprose nesovershennoletnego podozrevaemogo (obvinyaemogo) // Nauka i obrazovanie: hozyaystvo i ekonomika; predprinimatel'stvo; pravo i upravlenie. - 2014. - № 12 (55). - S. 78-80.

10. Ozhegov S.I. Tolkovyy slovar' russkogo yazyka. - Moskva: AST, 2010. - 736 s.