Peculiarities of law enforcement practice of legislative acts in the first half of the XIXth century on the example of the Department of Estates

Yulia Krasnikova

doi:10.35750/2071-8284-2024-3-38-48

UDC

342.2

CSCSTI

10.09

Russian Classification of Professions by Education

40.03.01

Russian Trade and Bibliographic Classification

7513

Russian Library and Bibliographic Classification

673

VAK Russia

5.1.1

PECULIARITIES OF LAW ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE OF LEGISLATIVE ACTS IN THE FIRST HALF OF THE XIXTH CENTURY ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ESTATES Peculiarities of law enforcement practice of legislative acts in the first half of the XIXth century on the example of the Department of Estates

АА Аа

Published in Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia · Pages 38–48 · Rubric: Theoretical and historical legal sciences

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2024-3-38-48

Received: 13.11.2023 Accepted: 05.09.2024 Published: 27.09.2024 Language of publication: RUS

Authors

Yulia Krasnikova

ORCID

Yulia Krasnikova

Academic degree: doctor of historical sciences

Science rang: docent

Institute of Historyof Saint Petersburg State University Docent · Institute of History · Russian Federation

ORCID

ABSTRACT

Introduction. The article is devoted to the consideration of the revealed peculiarities in the law enforcement practice of the legislation of the first half of the XIXth century on the example of the highest state institution – the Department of Estates, which ensured the allowance of the members of the imperial family. In the history of the Department under consideration the contradictory nature of monarchist power was revealed. The emperor, being the supreme legislator, was faced with a difficult dilemma: how to keep a balance between national and personal interests. While managing his own economy, he adjusted the state law enforcement practice to the interests of the Department, clarifying it with his resolutions. Methods. The main research methods were structural-functional and hermeneutic ones. They made it possible not only to work with the text and its meanings, but also to understand the peculiarities that distinguished the Department of Estates in the state system of higher institutions of the Russian Empire of the first half of the XIXth century. Results. The author concluded that the peculiarities of the law enforcement activity of the Department of Estates were primarily determined by the specificity of its tasks. Law enforcement activity was blurred by the interests of the members of the imperial family and general state tasks. The absence of some managerial decisions in normative legal acts and their fixation only in the form of resolutions to documents created unclearness (ambiguity). It caused contradictions in law enforcement activities and complicated the interaction of the Department of Estates with other state institutions of the Russian Empire.

KEYWORDS

Department of Estates, imperial family, law enforcement practice, legislation of the first half of the XIXth century, Russian Empire

1. Samusevich A. G. Ponyatie i znachenie stadiy pravoprimeneniya // Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. – 2022. – № 4 (29). – S. 227–232; https://doi.org/10.47905/MATGIP.2022.29.4.019.

2. Samusevich A. G., Shutova V. N. K voprosu o ponimanii i suschnosti konstitucionnogo pravoprimeneniya // Leningradskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. – 2022. – № 4 (70). – S. 84–98; https://doi.org/10.35231/18136230_2022_4_84.

3. Paleha R. R. Pravoprimenitel'nyy akt – zavershayuschiy etap pravoprimenitel'noy deyatel'nosti // Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki. – 2006. – № 2 (42). – S. 114–116.

4. Shapovalova Ya. V. Sootnoshenie ponyatiy «pravoprimenitel'naya oshibka» i «defekt pravoprimenitel'nogo akta» (teoretiko-pravovoy analiz) // Teoriya i praktika obschestvennogo razvitiya. – 2018. – № 10 (128). – S. 74–77; https://doi.org/10.24158/tipor.2018.10.12.

5. Voplenko N. N., Rozhnov A. P. Praoprimenitel'naya praktika: ponyatie, osnovnye cherty i funkcii : monografiya. – Volgograd: Izdatel'stvo VolGU, 2004. – 202 s.

6. Danilevskaya I. L. Istoriya nauki russkogo gosudarstvennogo prava i sovremennost' // Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika. – 2022. – № 11 (215). – S. 109–111; https://doi.org/10.47643/1815-1337_2022_11_109.

7. Samarskiy A. N., Zhulanov A. V. Sovershenstvovanie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy imperii v pervoy polovine XIX veka: svod zakonov Rossiyskoy imperii // Filosofiya prava. – 2020. – № 1 (92). – S. 100–104.

8. Mickevich A. V. Sistematizaciya zakonov Rossiyskoy imperii M. M. Speranskim // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. – 2001. – № 5. – C. 154–160.

9. Shepeleva A. S. Osobennosti pravoprimenitel'noy deyatel'nosti v Rossiyskiy imperii: problemy obespecheniya effektivnosti (na primere avtorskogo prava) // Pravo i praktika. – 2019. – № 4. – S. 56–59.

10. Nagih S. I., Shershneva-Citul'skaya I. A. Instituty naslednika, sopravitelya (preemnika) i vospriemnika verhovnoy vlasti v istorii rossiyskogo prava (XV – nachalo XX vv.) // Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. – 2023. – T. 16, № 4. – S. 56–79; https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2023.4.56.79.

11. Krasnikova Yu. N. Nikolay I: imperator i pomeschik (protivorechivost' politicheskogo liderstva v Rossii) // Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. – 2014. – № 35. – S. 371–376.

12. Minnikes I. A., Minnikes I. V. Istoricheskoe tolkovanie v prave: soderzhanie i vidy // Pravoprimenenie. – 2022. – T. 6, № 2. – S. 5–18; https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2022.6(2).

13. Kozhevnikov V. V. Tolkovanie yuridicheskih norm: sistemnyy podhod // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo. – 2018. – № 29. – S. 15–28; https://doi.org/10.17223/22253513/29/2.

14. Krasnikova Yu. N. K voprosu o formirovanii udel'noy sistemy hozyaystvovaniya v nachale XIX v. // Voprosy istorii. – 2022. – № 11–2. – S. 28–37.

15. Krasnikova Yu. N. Udel'nye krest'yane Severo-Zapada Rossii v konce XVIII – pervoy chetverti XIX veka: iz istorii agrarnyh otnosheniy : monografiya. – Sankt-Peterburg: FGBOU VPO SPbGAU, 2014. – 199 s.

GOST

Krasnikova Y. N. Peculiarities of law enforcement practice of legislative acts in the first half of the XIXth century on the example of the Department of Estates // . 2023. pp. 38-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2024-3-38-48. (Date of access 19.08.2026).

MLA

Yulia Krasnikova. "Peculiarities of law enforcement practice of legislative acts in the first half of the XIXth century on the example of the Department of Estates." (2023): 38-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2024-3-38-48.

APA

Krasnikova Y. N. (2023). Peculiarities of law enforcement practice of legislative acts in the first half of the XIXth century on the example of the Department of Estates. , 38-48. https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2024-3-38-48

Chicago

Yulia Krasnikova. "Peculiarities of law enforcement practice of legislative acts in the first half of the XIXth century on the example of the Department of Estates." , no. (2023): 38-48. https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2024-3-38-48.

WIKI

{{cite journal | author = Krasnikova Y. N. | title = Peculiarities of law enforcement practice of legislative acts in the first half of the XIXth century on the example of the Department of Estates | journal = | year = 2023 | pages = 38-48 | doi = 10.35750/2071-8284-2024-3-38-48 }}

Copy

Export: BibTeX EndNote RefMan RusMARC

PECULIARITIES OF LAW ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE OF LEGISLATIVE ACTS IN THE FIRST HALF OF THE XIXTH CENTURY ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ESTATES Peculiarities of law enforcement practice of legislative acts in the first half of the XIXth century on the example of the Department of Estates

Confirmation