Introduction. Ensuring legal protection of property relations is not only one of the priority tasks of criminal legislation, but also a constitutionally enshrined guarantee, an obligation of the state. In the history of Russia, property relations have undergone many changes, which was reflected, in particular, in legal acts. The resolution of problems related to ensuring criminal-legal protection of property corresponding to the modern level of development of social relations largely depends on the state of legislation. Its norms must be considered in a historical perspective. Thus, for example, the issue of determining the subject of property crimes was resolved differently at different times. The purpose of our study was to identify the features of the subject of such crimes through the study of historical experience. In our opinion, it is advisable to take it into account when resolving the issue posed. The objectives of the study were the study of regulatory acts of different historical periods of the development of our state, a comparative analysis of their provisions in terms of determining the subject of property crimes, identifying differences, as well as features of terminology. Methods. In the course of the study, the results of which are presented in the article, the following were used: the method of comparative analysis and synthesis, which helped to identify similarities and differences in regulations that regulated the criminal-legal protection of property in our country at different times; the method of abstraction, which helped to identify the features of the formation and development of ideas about the subject of property crimes, as well as concepts used in modern criminal legislation. Comparative-legal and historical-legal methods made it possible to compare historical regulations in the sphere of ensuring criminal-legal protection of property, compare their provisions and identify distinctive features. Results. The article presents the features of the subject of property crimes characteristic of different historical periods of development of our state. The provisions of the studied regulations are determined, which seem appropriate to be used in a modern interpretation in the current criminal legislation of the Russian Federation.
Criminal and legal protection of property, historical aspect, subject of crime, property crimes, criminal legislation
1. Ivanov, A. A. Pravo lichnoj sobstvennosti grazhdan SSSR: problemy i perspektivy / A. A. Ivanov // Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Pravovedenie. – 1988. – № 5. – S. 52-60. – EDN TWMPSD.
2. Isaev, M.M. Ugolovnoe pravo Kievskoj Rusi // Uchenye trudy. Uchenye trudy VIYUN. – M.: YUrid. izd-vo MYU SSSR, 1946, Vyp. 8. – 260 s. – S. 153-176.
3. Osyko, I. V. Zloupotreblenie doveriem kak sposob soversheniya moshennichestva / I. V. Osyko, A. A. Tashkenbaev // Nauka i real'nost'. – 2021. – № 1(5). – S. 200-203. – EDN ELYOYA.
4. Kruglikov, L. L. Problemy teorii ugolovnogo prava : izbrannye stat'i (2000-2009 gg.) / L. L. Kruglikov ; L. L. Kruglikov ; M-vo obrazovaniya i nauki Rossijskoj Federacii, Federal'noe agentstvo po obrazovaniyu Rossijskoj Federacii, YAroslavskij gos. un-t im. P. G. Demidova. – YAroslavl' : YAroslavskij gos. un-t im. P. G. Demidova, 2010. – 590 s. – ISBN 978-5-8397-0734-4. – EDN QRVLYP.
5. Skoblikov, P. A. Ponyatie «imushchestvennye prestupleniya» v rossijskom ugolovnom zakonodatel'stve i pravovoj doktrine: istoriya voprosa / P. A. Skoblikov // Pravo: istoriya i sovremennost'. – 2022. – T. 6, № 4. – S. 520-527. – DOIhttps://doi.org/10.17277/pravo.2022.04.pp.520-527. – EDN AJIXVW.
6. Bakradze, A. A. Teoreticheskie osnovy ugolovno-pravovoj ohrany sobstvennosti ot prestuplenij, sovershaemyh putem obmana ili zloupotrebleniya doveriem / A. A. Bakradze. – Moskva : Obshchestvo s ogranichennoj otvetstvennost'yu Izdatel'stvo «YUniti-Dana», 2011. – 400 s. – (Nauchnye izdaniya dlya yuristov). – ISBN 978-5-238-02240-6. – EDN QYVYGX.
7. Pinaev, A. A. Sistema prestuplenij protiv socialisticheskoj sobstvennosti / A. A. Pinaev // Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Pravovedenie. – 1989. – № 1. – S. 67-72. – EDN TUCTDB.
8. Tolstoj, YU. K. Sobstvennost' i pravo sobstvennosti v usloviyah perestrojki / YU. K. Tolstoj // Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Pravovedenie. – 1990. – № 4. – S. 3-15. – EDN TTHTZF.
9. Bojcov, A. I. Prestupleniya protiv sobstvennosti / A. I. Bojcov ; Associaciya yuridicheskij centr. – Sankt-Peterburg : Izdatel'stvo "YUridicheskij centr Press", 2002. – 775 s. – (Teoriya i praktika ugolovnogo prava i ugolovnogo processa). – ISBN 5-94201-062-5. – EDN UBTAMH.
10. Veklenko, V. V. Kvalifikaciya hishchenij : Monografiya / V. V. Veklenko. – Omsk : Omskaya akademiya MVD Rossii, 2001. – 256 s. – ISBN 5-88651-150-4. – EDN VRSBEX.
11. Prestupleniya protiv sobstvennosti : teoret.-prikl. issled. / N. A. Lopashenko. – Moskva : LeksEst, 2005 (OAO Mozhajskij poligr. komb.). – 405 s. (Seriya «Ugolovnoe pravo»); ISBN 5-901638-55-7.
12. Borisova, O. V. Ugolovno-pravovoe obespechenie ravenstva form sobstvennosti / O. V. Borisova // Lex Russica (Russkij zakon). – 2015. – T. 98, № 1. – S. 104-111. – EDN TJUDNP.
13. Dorohina, YU. A. Osobennosti kvalifikacii prestuplenij protiv sobstvennosti / YU. A. Dorohina // Vestnik Ural'skogo instituta ekonomiki, upravleniya i prava. – 2015. – № 3(32). – S. 34-43. – EDN VHLXWP.
14. SHul'ga, A. V. Razvitie imushchestvennyh otnoshenij v usloviyah sovremennogo obshchestva i prestupnyh posyagatel'stv na nih / A. V. SHul'ga // Vestnik Krasnodarskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. – 2015. – № 4(30). – S. 91-96. – EDN VNWVFR.
15. Veklenko, V. V. Prestupleniya protiv sobstvennosti kak ugolovno-pravovaya fikciya / V. V. Veklenko // Rossijskij yuridicheskij zhurnal. – 2000. – № 3(27). – S. 12-16. – EDN DSGBUV.
